Comparison of the Degree of Expanded Spinal Canal Area between the Hinge-Side Area and the Open-Side Area in Cervical Open-Door Laminoplasty

Background: There have been reports on the significant canal cross-sectional area (CSA) expansion difference between pre- and post-operation, but no comparison of CSA expansion between the hinge-side area (Area H) and the open-side area (Area O) has been reported. This study aimed to measure the spinal CSA expansion between Area H and Area O retrospectively after open-door laminoplasty using new titanium spacers and evaluated this common decompression procedure's effectiveness. Materials and Methods: This study included 27 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and developmental canal stenosis from February 2021 to October 2022. The CSA difference between pre- and post-cervical laminoplasty (C4–C6 levels) was measured with cervical transverse computed tomography scan images. The CSA difference in Area H and Area O between pre- and post-laminoplasty was similarly calculated. Results: The spinal canal areas of each segment after open-door laminoplasty were significantly enlarged (P < 0.05). Area O was also significantly enlarged compared to that of Area H (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Area O was more enlarged than Area H, and both sides were statistically enlarged after open-door laminoplasty.

[1]  Z. Fang,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two Modified Open-door Laminoplasties Based on a Novel Paraspinal Approach for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2021, Spine.

[2]  Gongping Xu,et al.  Open-door versus french-door laminoplasty for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2021, World neurosurgery.

[3]  Xiao-feng Zhao,et al.  Comparison of Imaging Parameters between a New Cervical Full Lamina Back Shift Spinal Canal Enlargement Technique and Single Open‐Door Laminoplasty for Multisegment Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2021, Orthopaedic surgery.

[4]  J. Mizuno,et al.  Clinical outcome and radiological findings after cervical open door laminoplasty with titanium basket , 2020, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[5]  J. Mizuno,et al.  Single - Door Cervical Laminoplasty Using Basket Laminoplasty Device: A Case Report , 2019, Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences.

[6]  N. Inoue,et al.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a monocoque plate-spacer construct for cervical open-door laminoplasty , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  J. Mizuno,et al.  Initial radiological findings utilizing titanium basket for cervical open door laminoplasty , 2017, Surgical neurology international.

[8]  J. Ahn,et al.  Comparison between Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Laminoplasties with Titanium Miniplates for Cervical Myelopathy , 2016, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[9]  Hiroki Ohashi,et al.  New titanium spacer for cervical laminoplasty: initial clinical experience. Technical note. , 2010, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[10]  K. Wakano,et al.  Expansive Open‐Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spinal Stenotic Myelopathy , 1983, Spine.