Beyond rating prediction accuracy: on new perspectives in recommender systems

This paper proposes a number of studies in order to move recommender systems beyond the traditional paradigm and the classical perspective of rating prediction accuracy. We contribute to existing helpful but less explored paradigms and also propose new approaches aiming at more useful recommendations for both users and businesses. Working toward this direction, we discuss the studies we have conducted so far and present our future research plans. In particular, we move our focus from even more accurate rating predictions and aim at offering a holistic experience to the users by avoiding the over-specialization of generated recommendations and providing the users with sets of non-obvious but high quality recommendations that fairly match their interests and they will remarkably like.

[1]  Chak-Kuen Wong,et al.  An Efficient Method for Weighted Sampling Without Replacement , 1980, SIAM J. Comput..

[2]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Breaking out of the box of recommendations: from items to packages , 2010, RecSys '10.

[3]  Aditya G. Parameswaran,et al.  Recommendations with prerequisites , 2009, RecSys '09.

[4]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Recommender Systems - An Introduction , 2010 .

[5]  Patrick Seemann,et al.  Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems , 2014 .

[6]  John Riedl,et al.  Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience , 2012, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[7]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  On Unexpectedness in Recommender Systems: Or How to Expect the Unexpected , 2011, DiveRS@RecSys.

[8]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Group Recommender Systems: Combining Individual Models , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[9]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  Looking for "Good" Recommendations: A Comparative Evaluation of Recommender Systems , 2011, INTERACT.

[10]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[11]  R. Koenker Quantile Regression: Fundamentals of Quantile Regression , 2005 .

[12]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Mixing it up: recommending collections of items , 2009, CHI.

[13]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  On Unexpectedness in Recommender Systems , 2013, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[14]  John Riedl,et al.  PolyLens: A recommender system for groups of user , 2001, ECSCW.

[15]  Sean M. McNee,et al.  Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  Probabilistic Neighborhood Selection in Collaborative Filtering Systems , 2013 .

[17]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses , 2013, ICIS.

[18]  R. Bell,et al.  The million dollar programming prize , 2009, IEEE Spectrum.

[19]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Slope One Predictors for Online Rating-Based Collaborative Filtering , 2007, SDM.

[20]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  Recommendation opportunities: improving item prediction using weighted percentile methods in collaborative filtering systems , 2013, RecSys.

[21]  Alexandros Karatzoglou,et al.  Quantile Matrix Factorization for Collaborative Filtering , 2010, EC-Web.

[22]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news , 1997, CACM.