Procurement with Reverse Auction and Flexible Noncompetitive Contracts

This article investigates a hybrid procurement mechanism that combines a reverse auction with flexible noncompetitive contracts. A buyer adopts such mechanism to procure multiple units of a product from a group of potential suppliers. Specifically, the buyer first offers contracts to some suppliers who, if accepting the contract, do not participate in the auction while committing to selling a unit to the buyer at the price of the subsequent auction. For the suppliers rejecting the offers, they can join the subsequent auction with the other suppliers to compete on the remaining units. When the buyer offers only one flexible noncompetitive contract, we find that the selected supplier may accept the offer regardless of whether he knows his exact cost information. Meanwhile, the buyer can benefit from offering such a contract, as opposed to solely conducting a regular reverse auction or offering a noncompetitive contract that does not allow suppliers declining offers to join the subsequent auction. Moreover, we find that the suppliers' information about their own costs has a significant impact on the buyer's decision. When the buyer makes multiple offers, we analyze the resulting game behavior of the selected suppliers and demonstrate that the buyer can benefit more than just offering one such contract. Therefore, the hybrid procurement mechanism can be mutually beneficial for both the buyer and the selected suppliers.

[1]  Samit Soni,et al.  A Framework for Facilitating Sourcing and Allocation Decisions for Make-to-Order Items , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[2]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Coercion and reverse auctions , 2007 .

[3]  Wedad Elmaghraby,et al.  Supply Contract Competition and Sourcing Policies , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  Roberto Burguet,et al.  Preferred suppliers in auction markets , 2009 .

[5]  Daniel F. Spulber,et al.  Managing procurement auctions , 1990 .

[6]  Eitan Zemel,et al.  Sourcing Through Auctions and Audits , 2008, Production and Operations Management.

[7]  Elena Katok,et al.  E-sourcing in Procurement: Theory and Behavior in Reverse Auctions with Noncompetitive Contracts , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Damian R. Beil,et al.  RFQ Auctions with Supplier Qualification Screening , 2009, Oper. Res..

[9]  Fangruo Chen,et al.  Auctioning Supply Contracts , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Robin Roundy,et al.  Efficient Auction Mechanisms for Supply Chain Procurement , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Richard Engelbrecht-Wiggans,et al.  Auctions with Noncompetitive Sales , 1996 .

[13]  X. Hua,et al.  Strategic ex ante contracts: rent extraction and opportunity costs , 2008 .

[14]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  Online reverse auctions: Common myths versus evolving reality , 2007 .

[15]  Jackie Rees Ulmer,et al.  Reverse Auctions with Multiple Reinforcement Learning Agents , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[16]  R. Cassady Auctions and Auctioneering , 2023 .

[17]  Jack C. Hayya,et al.  The optimal format to sell a product through the internet: Posted price, auction, and buy-price auction , 2010 .

[18]  Thomas P. Lyon,et al.  What Do "Facilitating Practices" Facilitate? An Empirical Investigation of Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Natural Gas Contracts , 1994, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[19]  Bart J. Wilson,et al.  Second chance offers versus sequential auctions: theory and behavior , 2007 .

[20]  H. N. Nagaraja,et al.  Order Statistics, Third Edition , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[21]  Sandy D. Jap Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future , 2002 .