Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

A functional simulation of hearing loss was evaluated in its ability to reproduce the temporal masking functions for eight listeners with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Each audiometric loss was simulated in a group of age-matched normal-hearing listeners through a combination of spectrally-shaped masking noise and multi-band expansion. Temporal-masking functions were obtained in both groups of listeners using a forward-masking paradigm in which the level of a 110-ms masker required to just mask a 10-ms fixed-level probe (5-10 dB SL) was measured as a function of the time delay between the masker offset and probe onset. At each of four probe frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz), temporal-masking functions were obtained using maskers that were 0.55, 1.0, and 1.15 times the probe frequency. The slopes and y-intercepts of the masking functions were not significantly different for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss. The y-intercepts were positively correlated with level of hearing loss while the slopes were negatively correlated. The ratio of the slopes obtained with the low-frequency maskers relative to the on-frequency maskers was similar for both groups of listeners and indicated a smaller compressive effect than that observed in normal-hearing listeners.

[1]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. A. Nelson,et al.  Auditory time constants for off-frequency forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  D A Nelson,et al.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E Villchur,et al.  Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Sid P. Bacon,et al.  Cochlear Compression: Perceptual Measures and Implications for Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[8]  C M Reed,et al.  Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P M Zurek,et al.  Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[12]  J R Dubno,et al.  Frequency Selectivity for Hearing-Impaired and Broadband-noise-masked Normal Listeners , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  D. Kewley-Port,et al.  Vowel perception by noise masked normal-hearing young adults. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  David A Nelson,et al.  Peripheral compression as a function of stimulus level and frequency region in normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D A Nelson,et al.  The effect of basilar-membrane nonlinearity on the shapes of masking period patterns in normal and impaired hearing. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss , 2005, Hearing Research.

[17]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  H. Duifhuis Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking , 1987 .

[22]  Thomas Baer,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .

[23]  B. Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  L. Humes Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[25]  S. Bacon,et al.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Zachary D. Perez,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Perceptual consequences of peripheral hearing loss: do edge effects exist for abrupt cochlear lesions? , 1998, Hearing Research.

[29]  Louis D. Braida,et al.  Perception of speech and non-speech sounds by listeners with real and simulated sensorineural hearing loss , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[30]  B C Moore,et al.  Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Vit Drga,et al.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Ray Meddis,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity between 500 and 8000 Hz in listeners with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D Y Chung Masking, temporal integration, and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  L. Feth,et al.  Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Louis D Braida,et al.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  D A Fabry,et al.  Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[39]  C S Watson,et al.  Temporal integration. I. Clinical implications of a laboratory study. II. Additional data from hearing-impaired subjects. , 1971, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[40]  E Villchur,et al.  Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  W. Melnick,et al.  Effects of Modulated Noise on Speech Intelligibility of People with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[43]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  B. Moore,et al.  Temporal masking curves for hearing-impaired listeners , 2006, Hearing Research.

[45]  René H Gifford,et al.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  The Dependence of Hearing Impairment on Sound Intensity , 1937 .

[48]  R W Gengel,et al.  Auditory temporal integration at relatively high masked-threshold levels. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  A. Needleman,et al.  Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[50]  René H Gifford,et al.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[51]  L E Humes,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  M Florentine Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[53]  R L Freyman,et al.  Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  Peggy B Nelson,et al.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  D. L. Neff,et al.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.