Peer-based control in self-managing teams: linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance.

The authors use a multilevel framework to introduce peer-based control as a motivational state that emerges in self-managing teams. The authors specifically describe how peer-based rational control, which is defined as team members perceiving the distribution of economic rewards as dependent on input from teammates, extends and interacts with the more commonly studied normative control force of group cohesion to explain both individual and collective performance in teams. On the basis of data from 587 factory workers in 45 self-managing teams at 3 organizations, peer-based rational control corresponded with higher performance for both individuals and collective teams. Results further demonstrated that the rational and normative mechanism of peer-based control interacted to explain performance at both the individual and team levels. Increased peer-based rational control corresponded with higher individual and collective performance in teams with low cohesion, but the positive effects on performance were attenuated in cohesive teams.

[1]  C. Barnard.  The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[2]  L. Festinger.  Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[3]  S. Asch.  Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[4]  S. Schachter,et al.  An Experimental Study of Cohesiveness and Productivity , 1951 .

[5]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  Groups, Leadership, and Men , 1952 .

[6]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[7]  L. Berkowitz.  Group Standards, Cohesiveness, and Productivity , 1954 .

[8]  S. Seashore,et al.  Group Cohesiveness in the Industrial Work Group. , 1955 .

[9]  G. Mellinger.  Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[10]  Alvin Zander,et al.  Personal Goals and the Group's Goals for the Member , 1960 .

[11]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[12]  D. Campbell,et al.  The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[13]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[14]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[15]  A. Lott,et al.  Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[17]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[18]  T. Smith,et al.  Autokinetic paradigms: a reply to Alexander, Zucker and Brody. , 1975, Sociometry.

[19]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Norm Change Over Subject Generations as a Function of Arbitrariness of Prescribed Norms , 1976 .

[20]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[21]  H. Miller,et al.  Motivation, behavior, and performance: A closer examination of goal setting and monetary incentives. , 1978 .

[22]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[23]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  Split Roles in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[24]  Ken Eason,et al.  Changes in working life: Edited by K. D. Duncan, M.M. Gruneberg and D. Wallis Wiley, Chichester 1980 pp 568, £24.50 , 1981 .

[25]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[26]  C. Carver,et al.  Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  R. Reilly,et al.  VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES , 1982 .

[28]  M. Kiggundu.  Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory. , 1983, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[29]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Social Comparison Theory and the Evaluation of Peer Evaluations: A Review and Some Applied Implications. , 1983 .

[30]  J. Paul Sorrels,et al.  Conformity by Omission , 1984 .

[31]  George Cheney,et al.  Communication and Unobtrusive Control in Contemporary Organizations , 1985 .

[32]  S. Harkins,et al.  The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .

[33]  P. Tompkins,et al.  Organizational communication : traditional themes and new directions , 1985 .

[34]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[35]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  On the Psychometric Properties of a Scale to Measure Leadership Substitutes , 1986 .

[36]  R. Keller,et al.  Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R & D Organizations , 1986 .

[37]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[38]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Understanding groups in organizations. , 1987 .

[39]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[40]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[41]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Job experience correlates of job performance. , 1988 .

[42]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[43]  D. Rousseau.  Psychological and implied contracts in organizations , 1989 .

[44]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Applied psychology : an international review , 1989 .

[45]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Collective Sanctions and Compliance Norms: A Formal Theory of Group-Mediated Social Control , 1990 .

[46]  J. George,et al.  Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. , 1990 .

[47]  R. Kanfer.  Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[48]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[49]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[50]  J. Hackman.  Group influences on individuals in organizations. , 1992 .

[51]  S. Barley,et al.  Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. , 1992 .

[52]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[53]  J. Shepperd.  Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. , 1993 .

[54]  J. Barker.  Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams , 1993 .

[55]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[56]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research , 1993 .

[57]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[58]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[59]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. , 1993 .

[60]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[61]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  GAINSHARING AND MUTUAL MONITORING: A COMBINED AGENCY-ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE INTERPRETATION , 1995 .

[62]  H. Klein,et al.  Two Investigations of the Relationships among Group Goals, Goal Commitment, Cohesion, and Performance , 1995 .

[63]  Robert L. Heneman,et al.  Balancing Group and Individual Rewards , 1995 .

[64]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .

[65]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 1995 .

[66]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[67]  K. Jehn,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND TASK PERFORMANCE: AN EXAMINATION OF MEDIATING PROCESSES IN FRIENDSHIP AND ACQUAINTANCE GROUPS. , 1996 .

[68]  G. Stewart,et al.  Reward structure as a moderator of the relationship between extraversion and sales performance. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[69]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  New Directions for Organization Theory: Problems and Prospects , 1999 .

[70]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[71]  Fred Luthans,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, 1975–95 , 1997 .

[72]  Nathan Bennett,et al.  Does Work Group Cohesiveness Affect Individuals' Performance and Organizational Commitment? , 1998 .

[73]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[74]  S. Karau,et al.  Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. , 1998 .

[75]  G. Sewell.  The discipline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. , 1998 .

[76]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance , 2022 .

[77]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[78]  V. Druskat,et al.  Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[79]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[80]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[81]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[82]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .

[83]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[84]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Peer Responses to Low Performers: An Attributional Model of Helping in the Context of Groups , 2001 .

[85]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[86]  A. Erez,et al.  EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[87]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[88]  Deidra J. Schleicher,et al.  A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. , 2003 .

[89]  M. Hitt,et al.  Managing Knowledge for Sustained Competitive Advantage: Designing Strategies for Effective Human Resource Management , 2003 .

[90]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[91]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[92]  Arthur A. Thompson,et al.  Crafting and Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage: Concepts and Cases , 2004 .

[93]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[94]  K. R. Milner,et al.  A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[95]  James W. Smither,et al.  DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS , 2005 .

[96]  Wing Tung Au,et al.  Normative controls and self-reported counterproductive behaviors in the workplace in China , 2005 .

[97]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[98]  Barry Gerhart,et al.  Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[99]  David A Harrison,et al.  Withholding inputs in team contexts: member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[100]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Toward a Systems Theory of Motivated Behavior in Work Teams , 2006 .

[101]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Group norms and excessive absenteeism : The role of peer referent others , 2007 .

[102]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Performance Implications of Peer Monitoring , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[103]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[104]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[105]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Work motivation : past, present, and future , 2008 .

[106]  Robb Willer.  Groups Reward Individual Sacrifice: The Status Solution to the Collective Action Problem , 2009 .

[107]  G. Stewart.  The Past Twenty Years: Teams Research Is Alive and Well at the Journal of Management , 2010 .

[108]  S. Courtright,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[109]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research , 2011 .

[110]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review , 2011 .

[111]  Эшфорт Блейк,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 2012 .