Strategies for integrating water management and spatial planning: Organising for spatial quality in the Dutch “Room for the River” program
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Verweij | T. Busscher | M. van den Brink | T. Busscher | M. van den Brink | S. Verweij | Tim Busscher | M. V. D. Brink | Stefan Verweij
[1] Benoît Rihoux,et al. Crisp Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) , 2009 .
[2] Frans Klijn,et al. Design quality of room-for-the-river measures in the Netherlands: role and assessment of the quality team (Q-team) , 2013 .
[3] M. Lamers,et al. Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .
[4] Sandra Lowe,et al. Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .
[5] Carsten Q. Schneider,et al. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .
[6] P. Driessen,et al. The flood risk management plan: towards spatial water governance , 2017 .
[7] Jurian Edelenbos,et al. Making space for the river : governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe , 2012 .
[8] Maarten Wolsink,et al. River basin approach and integrated water management: Governance pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle , 2006 .
[9] Pieter Hooimeijer,et al. Kwaliteit in meervoud; conceptualisering en operationalisering van ruimtelijke kwaliteit voor meervoudig ruimtegebruik , 2001 .
[10] Carsten Q. Schneider,et al. Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .
[11] Lasse Gerrits,et al. Implementing Public–Private Partnerships , 2017 .
[12] J. V. Meijering,et al. Exploring research priorities in landscape architecture: An international Delphi Study , 2015 .
[13] B. Noble,et al. A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature , 2018 .
[14] Johan Woltjer,et al. Integrating Water Management and Spatial Planning , 2007 .
[15] A. Marx,et al. Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification , 2011 .
[16] Bert Enserink,et al. Information Management for Public Participation in Co-design Processes: Evaluation of a Dutch Example , 2003 .
[17] S. Verweij. Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis , 2013 .
[18] Stefan Verweij,et al. Het organiseren van ruimtelijke kwaliteit: Inzichten uit Ruimte voor de Rivier , 2017 .
[19] Niels Heeres,et al. Coping with functional interrelatedness and stakeholder fragmentation in planning at the infrastructure-land use interface: The potential merits of a design approach , 2016 .
[20] M. A. M. Groot-Reichwein,et al. Climate Adaptation Services for the Netherlands: an operational approach to support spatial adaptation planning , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.
[21] Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al. Adaptive Water Management and Policy Learning in a Changing Climate: a Formal Comparative Analysis of Eight Water Management Regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia , 2011 .
[22] Adri van den Brink,et al. Strategies for Enhancing Landscape Architecture Research , 2014 .
[23] John Minnery. Planning and retrofitting for floods: insights from Australia , 2013 .
[24] WILLEM SALET,et al. Complexity and Uncertainty: Problem or Asset in Decision Making of Mega Infrastructure Projects? , 2013 .
[25] D. Roth,et al. Moving out or living on a mound? Jointly planning a Dutch flood adaptation project , 2014 .
[27] K. Takara,et al. Historical assessment of Chinese and Japanese flood management policies and implications for managing future floods , 2015 .
[28] Janakinath Dash. Climate Adaptation , 2019, Encyclopedia of GIS.
[29] K. Kibler,et al. Integrated Flood Management in developing countries: balancing flood risk, sustainable livelihoods, and ecosystem services , 2016 .
[30] James G. March,et al. The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence: Decisions and Learning in Organizations , 1999 .
[31] J. Rotmans,et al. The transition in Dutch water management , 2005 .
[32] J. Edelenbos. Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice , 2005 .
[33] Terry van Dijk,et al. Imagining future places: How designs co-constitute what is, and thus influence what will be , 2011 .
[34] Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al. What’s in a name: Project or programme? , 2011 .
[35] Kuei-Hsien Liao,et al. From flood control to flood adaptation: a case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington , 2014, Natural Hazards.
[36] B. Hedelin,et al. Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive – prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden , 2008 .
[37] G. T. Raadgever,et al. Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance , 2014, Water Resources Management.
[38] Z. Kundzewicz,et al. The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries , 2016 .
[39] Rianne Bijlsma,et al. Implementing Participatory Water Management: Recent Advances in Theory, Practice, and Evaluation , 2010 .
[40] Lasse Gerrits,et al. Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance , 2010 .
[41] W Grabs,et al. Integrated flood management. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.
[42] I. Immink,et al. When Water Management Meets Spatial Planning: A Policy-Arrangements Perspective , 2006 .
[43] C. Green,et al. Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review , 2016, Water Resources Management.
[44] Benoît Rihoux,et al. Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis , 2006 .
[45] Catrien J.A.M. Termeer,et al. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies Are Dutch Water Safety Institutions Prepared for Climate Change , 2010 .
[46] Erik-Hans Klijn,et al. What Makes Governance Networks Work? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Of 14 Dutch Spatial Planning Projects , 2013 .
[47] Carsten Q. Schneider,et al. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Potential pitfalls and suggestions for solutions , 2012 .
[48] Chris Zevenbergen,et al. Room for the River: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands , 2012 .
[49] Adrian Duşa,et al. User manual for the QCA(GUI) package in R , 2007 .
[50] J. Edelenbos,et al. Democratic Legitimacy of New Forms of Water Management in the Netherlands , 2012 .
[51] Lasse Gerrits,et al. The Evaluation of Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Chapter 1) , 2018 .
[52] F. Moulaert,et al. Building a Meta-Framework to ‘Address’ Spatial Quality , 2013 .
[53] Anne Loes Nillesen,et al. An integrated approach to flood risk management and spatial quality for a Netherlands’ river polder area , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
[54] Sissel Hovik,et al. Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in Norway: Bridging the Gap Between Water Management Networks and Elected Councils? , 2016 .
[55] Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al. Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .
[56] Johan Woltjer,et al. A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities – A Hamburg case study , 2015 .
[57] Thomas Hartmann,et al. The Flood Risk Management Plan: An Essential Step Towards the Institutionalization of a Paradigm Shift , 2014 .
[58] H. V. Stokkom,et al. Keynote lecture: Flood defense in The Netherlands: a new era, a new approach , 2002 .
[59] F. Klijn,et al. Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands , 2003 .