Strategies for integrating water management and spatial planning: Organising for spatial quality in the Dutch “Room for the River” program

In response to extreme flood events and an increasing awareness that traditional flood control measures alone are inadequate to deal with growing flood risks, spatial flood risk management strategies have been introduced. These strategies do not only aim to reduce the probability and consequences of floods, they also aim to improve local and regional spatial qualities. To date, however, research has been largely ignorant as to how spatial quality, as part of spatial flood risk management strategies, can be successfully achieved in practice. Therefore, this research aims to illuminate how spatial quality is achieved in planning practice. This is done by evaluating the configurations of policy instruments that have been applied in the Dutch Room for the River policy program to successfully achieve spatial quality. This policy program is well known for its dual objective of accommodating higher flood levels as well as improving the spatial quality of the riverine areas. Based on a qualitative comparative analysis, we identified three successful configurations of policy instruments. These constitute three distinct management strategies: the "program-as-guardian", the "project-as-driver," and "going all-in" strategies. These strategies provide important leads in furthering the development and implementation of spatial flood risk management, both in the Netherlands and abroad.

[1]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Crisp Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA) , 2009 .

[2]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Design quality of room-for-the-river measures in the Netherlands: role and assessment of the quality team (Q-team) , 2013 .

[3]  M. Lamers,et al.  Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .

[4]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[5]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Contents , 2012 .

[6]  P. Driessen,et al.  The flood risk management plan: towards spatial water governance , 2017 .

[7]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Making space for the river : governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe , 2012 .

[8]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  River basin approach and integrated water management: Governance pitfalls for the Dutch Space-Water-Adjustment Management Principle , 2006 .

[9]  Pieter Hooimeijer,et al.  Kwaliteit in meervoud; conceptualisering en operationalisering van ruimtelijke kwaliteit voor meervoudig ruimtegebruik , 2001 .

[10]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[11]  Lasse Gerrits,et al.  Implementing Public–Private Partnerships , 2017 .

[12]  J. V. Meijering,et al.  Exploring research priorities in landscape architecture: An international Delphi Study , 2015 .

[13]  B. Noble,et al.  A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature , 2018 .

[14]  Johan Woltjer,et al.  Integrating Water Management and Spatial Planning , 2007 .

[15]  A. Marx,et al.  Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification , 2011 .

[16]  Bert Enserink,et al.  Information Management for Public Participation in Co-design Processes: Evaluation of a Dutch Example , 2003 .

[17]  S. Verweij Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis , 2013 .

[18]  Stefan Verweij,et al.  Het organiseren van ruimtelijke kwaliteit: Inzichten uit Ruimte voor de Rivier , 2017 .

[19]  Niels Heeres,et al.  Coping with functional interrelatedness and stakeholder fragmentation in planning at the infrastructure-land use interface: The potential merits of a design approach , 2016 .

[20]  M. A. M. Groot-Reichwein,et al.  Climate Adaptation Services for the Netherlands: an operational approach to support spatial adaptation planning , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[21]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Adaptive Water Management and Policy Learning in a Changing Climate: a Formal Comparative Analysis of Eight Water Management Regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia , 2011 .

[22]  Adri van den Brink,et al.  Strategies for Enhancing Landscape Architecture Research , 2014 .

[23]  John Minnery Planning and retrofitting for floods: insights from Australia , 2013 .

[24]  WILLEM SALET,et al.  Complexity and Uncertainty: Problem or Asset in Decision Making of Mega Infrastructure Projects? , 2013 .

[25]  D. Roth,et al.  Moving out or living on a mound? Jointly planning a Dutch flood adaptation project , 2014 .

[26]  The spatial turn and the scenario approach in flood risk management—Implementing the European Floods Directive in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[27]  K. Takara,et al.  Historical assessment of Chinese and Japanese flood management policies and implications for managing future floods , 2015 .

[28]  Janakinath Dash Climate Adaptation , 2019, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[29]  K. Kibler,et al.  Integrated Flood Management in developing countries: balancing flood risk, sustainable livelihoods, and ecosystem services , 2016 .

[30]  James G. March,et al.  The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence: Decisions and Learning in Organizations , 1999 .

[31]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The transition in Dutch water management , 2005 .

[32]  J. Edelenbos Institutional Implications of Interactive Governance: Insights from Dutch Practice , 2005 .

[33]  Terry van Dijk,et al.  Imagining future places: How designs co-constitute what is, and thus influence what will be , 2011 .

[34]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  What’s in a name: Project or programme? , 2011 .

[35]  Kuei-Hsien Liao,et al.  From flood control to flood adaptation: a case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[36]  B. Hedelin,et al.  Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive – prospects for sustainable water planning in Sweden , 2008 .

[37]  G. T. Raadgever,et al.  Assessing Stability and Dynamics in Flood Risk Governance , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[38]  Z. Kundzewicz,et al.  The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries , 2016 .

[39]  Rianne Bijlsma,et al.  Implementing Participatory Water Management: Recent Advances in Theory, Practice, and Evaluation , 2010 .

[40]  Lasse Gerrits,et al.  Organizing interfaces between government institutions and interactive governance , 2010 .

[41]  W Grabs,et al.  Integrated flood management. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[42]  I. Immink,et al.  When Water Management Meets Spatial Planning: A Policy-Arrangements Perspective , 2006 .

[43]  C. Green,et al.  Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[44]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis , 2006 .

[45]  Catrien J.A.M. Termeer,et al.  IVM Institute for Environmental Studies Are Dutch Water Safety Institutions Prepared for Climate Change , 2010 .

[46]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  What Makes Governance Networks Work? A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Of 14 Dutch Spatial Planning Projects , 2013 .

[47]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: Potential pitfalls and suggestions for solutions , 2012 .

[48]  Chris Zevenbergen,et al.  Room for the River: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[49]  Adrian Duşa,et al.  User manual for the QCA(GUI) package in R , 2007 .

[50]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Democratic Legitimacy of New Forms of Water Management in the Netherlands , 2012 .

[51]  Lasse Gerrits,et al.  The Evaluation of Complex Infrastructure Projects: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Chapter 1) , 2018 .

[52]  F. Moulaert,et al.  Building a Meta-Framework to ‘Address’ Spatial Quality , 2013 .

[53]  Anne Loes Nillesen,et al.  An integrated approach to flood risk management and spatial quality for a Netherlands’ river polder area , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[54]  Sissel Hovik,et al.  Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in Norway: Bridging the Gap Between Water Management Networks and Elected Councils? , 2016 .

[55]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[56]  Johan Woltjer,et al.  A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities – A Hamburg case study , 2015 .

[57]  Thomas Hartmann,et al.  The Flood Risk Management Plan: An Essential Step Towards the Institutionalization of a Paradigm Shift , 2014 .

[58]  H. V. Stokkom,et al.  Keynote lecture: Flood defense in The Netherlands: a new era, a new approach , 2002 .

[59]  F. Klijn,et al.  Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands , 2003 .