On the scalability of IP micro-mobility management protocols

This paper concentrates on the scalability aspects of mobility management, particularly mobility within an access network ('micro-mobility'). It is argued that the normal classification of mobility protocols as tunnel-based or per host forwarding solutions is not useful from a scalability viewpoint. Three aspects of scalability are identified: terminal, geographic and throughput. The paper argues that terminal scalability is not a major issue, given assumptions about address allocation, whilst geographical and throughput scalability require the support of arbitrary topologies, and multiple gateways to the access network. Four exemplar micro-mobility protocols are discussed.

[1]  Alan O'Neill Host Specific Routing , 2000 .

[2]  Nikos Georganopoulos,et al.  Evaluation of the BRAIN Candidate Mobility Management Protocol , 2001 .

[3]  H. Soliman,et al.  Hierarchical MIPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6) , 2002 .

[4]  A. Howcroft,et al.  Scaling Global Internet Networks , 2000 .

[5]  Tapio Suihko,et al.  A framework for the evaluation of IP mobility protocols , 2000, 11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. PIMRC 2000. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8525).

[6]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  Application-layer mobility using SIP , 2000, MOCO.

[7]  Jukka Manner,et al.  Mobility Related Terminology , 2004, RFC.

[8]  A. A. Knecht EVALUATION OF A , 1972 .

[9]  A W O'Neill,et al.  Edge Mobility Architecture — Routeing and Hand-off , 2001 .