The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.

Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, and Kardes (1986) demonstrated that Ss were able to evaluate adjectives more quickly when these adjectives were immediately preceded (primed) by attitude objects of similar valence, compared with when these adjectives were primed by attitude objects of opposite valence. Moreover, this effect obtained primarily for attitude objects toward which Ss were presumed to hold highly accessible attitudes, as indexed by evaluation latency. The present research explored the generality of these findings across attitude objects and across procedural variations. The results of 3 experiments indicated that the automatic activation effect is a pervasive and relatively unconditional phenomenon. It appears that most evaluations stored in memory, for social and nonsocial objects alike, become active automatically on the mere presence or mention of the object in the environment.

[1]  R. Fazio.  Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework , 1990 .

[2]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[3]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[4]  P. Converse,et al.  Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue , 1970 .

[5]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection , 1986 .

[6]  R. Fazio,et al.  Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Time and the spread of activation in memory. , 1977 .

[8]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R. Fazio.  On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. , 1989 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[11]  R. Rosenthal.  Combining results of independent studies. , 1978 .

[12]  T Shallice,et al.  Dual functions of consciousness. , 1972, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Fazio.  How do attitudes guide behavior , 1986 .

[14]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[15]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[16]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[17]  P M MILNER,et al.  The cell assembly: Mark II. , 1957, Psychological review.

[18]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[19]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[20]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Significance Levels of Independent Studies , 1979 .

[21]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[22]  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[24]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. , 1992 .

[25]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[26]  J. Bargh.  Automatic and conscious processing of social information. , 1984 .

[27]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[28]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Bargh,et al.  Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[31]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[32]  N. Anderson.  Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  W. R. Garner.  Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts , 1975 .

[34]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in person x situation effects on person perception: it's just a matter of time. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? , 1978 .

[36]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Consistent attending versus consistent responding in visual search: Task versus component consistency in automatic processing development , 1984 .

[37]  Irwin Katz,et al.  Stigma: A Social Psychological Analysis , 1981 .

[38]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitude Accessibility as a Function of Repeated Attitudinal Expression , 1984 .

[39]  C. P. Whaley.  Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[40]  K. Kaplan.  On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[41]  G. Logan.  Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[43]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. , 1980 .

[44]  G. Logan.  Automaticity and cognitive control. , 1989 .

[45]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind , 1978 .