Dental microwear texture analysis correlations in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and sheep (Ovis aries) suggest that dental microwear texture signal consistency is species-specific

Dental microwear texture (DMT) analysis is used to differentiate abrasive dental wear patterns in many species fed different diets. Because DMT parameters all describe the same surface, they are expected to correlate with each other distinctively. Here, we explore the data range of, and correlations between, DMT parameters to increase the understanding of how this group of proxies records wear within and across species. The analysis was based on subsets of previously published DMT analyses in guinea pigs, sheep, and rabbits fed either a natural whole plant diet (lucerne, grass, bamboo) or pelleted diets with or without added quartz abrasives (guinea pigs and rabbits: up to 45 days, sheep: 17 months). The normalized DMT parameter range (P4: 0.69 ± 0.25; M2: 0.83 ± 0.16) and correlation coefficients (P4: 0.50 ± 0.31; M2: 0.63 ± 0.31) increased along the tooth row in guinea pigs, suggesting that strong correlations may be partially explained by data range. A comparison between sheep and guinea pigs revealed a higher DMT data range in sheep (0.93 ± 0.16; guinea pigs: 0.47 ± 0.29), but this did not translate into more substantial correlation coefficients (sheep: 0.35 ± 0.28; guinea pigs: 0.55 ± 0.32). Adding rabbits to an interspecies comparison of low abrasive dental wear (pelleted lucerne diet), the softer enamel of the hypselodont species showed a smaller data range for DMT parameters (guinea pigs 0.49 ± 0.32, rabbit 0.19 ± 0.18, sheep 0.78 ± 0.22) but again slightly higher correlations coefficients compared to the hypsodont teeth (guinea pigs 0.55 ± 0.31, rabbits 0.56 ± 0.30, sheep 0.42 ± 0.27). The findings suggest that the softer enamel of fast-replaced ever-growing hypselodont cheek teeth shows a greater inherent wear trace consistency, whereas the harder enamel of permanent and non-replaced enamel of hypsodont ruminant teeth records less coherent wear patterns. Because consistent diets were used across taxa, this effect cannot be ascribed to the random overwriting of individual wear traces on the more durable hypsodont teeth. This matches literature reports on reduced DMT pattern consistency on harder materials; possibly, individual wear events become more random in nature on harder material. Given the species-specific differences in enamel characteristics, the findings suggest a certain species-specificity of DMT patterns.

[1]  T. Attin,et al.  Species-specific enamel differences in hardness and abrasion resistance between the permanent incisors of cattle (Bos primigenius taurus) and the ever-growing incisors of nutria (Myocastor coypus) , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  F. Catzeflis,et al.  About inter- and intra-specific variability of dental microwear texture in rodents: Study of two sympatric Proechimys (Echimyidae) species from the Cacao locality, French Guiana , 2022, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.

[3]  M. Clauss,et al.  Dental wear proxy correlation in a long-term feeding experiment on sheep (Ovis aries) , 2021, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[4]  M. Clauss,et al.  Dental microwear texture gradients in guinea pigs reveal that material properties of the diet affect chewing behaviour. , 2021, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  M. Clauss,et al.  Tooth wear, growth and height in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) fed pelleted or extruded diets with or without added abrasives. , 2021, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[6]  G. Merceron,et al.  Dental microwear textures differ in pigs with overall similar diets but fed with different seeds , 2021 .

[7]  M. Purnell,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis along reptile tooth rows: complex variation with non-dietary variables , 2021, Royal Society Open Science.

[8]  M. Clauss,et al.  The turnover of dental microwear texture: Testing the” last supper” effect in small mammals in a controlled feeding experiment , 2020 .

[9]  Paul J. Constantino,et al.  Phytoliths can cause tooth wear , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[10]  M. Clauss,et al.  Dental wear at macro- and microscopic scale in rabbits fed diets of different abrasiveness: A pilot investigation , 2020, Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology.

[11]  M. Clauss,et al.  Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  M. Clauss,et al.  Everything matters: Molar microwear texture in goats (Capra aegagrus hircus) fed diets of different abrasiveness , 2020 .

[13]  D. Strait,et al.  Hard plant tissues do not contribute meaningfully to dental microwear: evolutionary implications , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[14]  M. Clauss,et al.  Dust and grit matter: abrasives of different size lead to opposing dental microwear textures in experimentally fed sheep (Ovis aries) , 2020, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  L. Marivaux,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis and diet in caviomorphs (Rodentia) from the Serra do Mar Atlantic forest (Brazil) , 2019, Journal of Mammalogy.

[16]  Kohske Takahashi,et al.  Welcome to the Tidyverse , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[17]  R. Wittig,et al.  Ontogenetic Dietary Shifts and Microscopic Tooth Wear in Western Chimpanzees , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[18]  R. Wittig,et al.  Dust affects chewing efficiency and tooth wear in forest dwelling Western chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus). , 2019, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  M. Clauss,et al.  Forage silica and water content control dental surface texture in guinea pigs and provide implications for dietary reconstruction , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Shannon P McPherron,et al.  Time wears on: Assessing how bone wears using 3D surface texture analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[21]  T. Kubo,et al.  Three-dimensional tooth surface texture analysis on stall-fed and wild boars (Sus scrofa) , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  M. Korzynski,et al.  Experimental Models and Correlations between Surface Parameters after Slide Diamond Burnishing , 2018, Measurement Science Review.

[23]  C. Vinyard,et al.  In Vivo Rates of Dental Microwear Formation in Laboratory Primates Fed Different Food Items , 2017 .

[24]  D. Gautier,et al.  Overcoming sampling issues in dental tribology: Insights from an experimentation on sheep , 2017 .

[25]  N. Brunetière,et al.  Untangling the environmental from the dietary: dust does not matter , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  M. Fortelius,et al.  Mechanical modelling of tooth wear , 2016, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  Larisa R.G. DeSantis,et al.  Dental microwear textures: reconstructing diets of fossil mammals , 2016 .

[28]  T. Kaiser,et al.  Tooth wear patterns in black rats (Rattus rattus) of Madagascar differ more in relation to human impact than to differences in natural habitats , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  M. Clauss,et al.  Comparative analyses of tooth wear in free-ranging and captive wild equids. , 2016, Equine veterinary journal.

[30]  J. Meullenet,et al.  Technical note: An in vitro study of dental microwear formation using the BITE Master II chewing machine. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[31]  M. Clauss,et al.  A set of hypotheses on tribology of mammalian herbivore teeth , 2015 .

[32]  T. Kaiser,et al.  Uneven distribution of enamel in the tooth crown of a Plains Zebra (Equus quagga) , 2015, PeerJ.

[33]  M. Clauss,et al.  Tooth length and incisal wear and growth in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) fed diets of different abrasiveness. , 2015, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[34]  Naz Shakila,et al.  Micro Hardness of Dental Tissues Influenced by Administration of Aspirin During Pregnancy , 2015 .

[35]  Neil Curtis,et al.  Masticatory biomechanics in the rabbit: a multi-body dynamics analysis , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  M. Fortelius,et al.  Growth and wear of incisor and cheek teeth in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) fed diets of different abrasiveness. , 2014, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[37]  J. Damuth,et al.  A Comparison of Observed Molar Wear Rates in Extant Herbivorous Mammals , 2014 .

[38]  Peter S. Ungar,et al.  Was the Giant Short-Faced Bear a Hyper-Scavenger? A New Approach to the Dietary Study of Ursids Using Dental Microwear Textures , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Zhongxiao Peng,et al.  Wear characterisation of articular cartilage surfaces at a nano-scale using atomic force microscopy , 2013 .

[40]  M. Clauss,et al.  Dietary Abrasiveness Is Associated with Variability of Microwear and Dental Surface Texture in Rabbits , 2013, PloS one.

[41]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  Teasing apart the contributions of hard dietary items on 3D dental microtextures in primates. , 2012, Journal of human evolution.

[42]  Jian Wang,et al.  A new approach to numerical characterisation of wear particle surfaces in three-dimensions for wear study , 2012, Wear.

[43]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  Applying tribology to teeth of hoofed mammals. , 2010, Scanning.

[44]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[45]  J. Brasch,et al.  TOOTH WEAR IN CAPTIVE GIRAFFES (GIRAFFA CAMELOPARDALIS): MESOWEAR ANALYSIS CLASSIFIES FREE-RANGING SPECIMENS AS BROWSERS BUT CAPTIVE ONES AS GRAZERS , 2007, Journal of zoo and wildlife medicine : official publication of the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians.

[46]  Peter S Ungar,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis: technical considerations. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[47]  M. Teaford,et al.  In vivo and in vitro turnover in dental microwear. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[48]  R. Laws DENTITION AND AGEING OF THE HIPPOPOTAMUS , 1968 .

[49]  W. Weijs,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Masticatory Apparatus in the Rabbit (Oryctolagus Cuniculus L.) , 1980 .