Constructing affiliation and solidarity in job interviews

Success in job interviews depends largely on the interviewers' favourable opinion of the candidates' presentation, and how well candidates have managed to build solidarity with their interviewers. This article explores the ways in which candidates shape their talk to interact interpersonally with their interviewers, so as to construct affiliation and solidarity. Drawing on Systemic Functional Linguistics Appraisal theory, in particular its system of Attitude, this article examines a set of authentic job interviews in French, or French and English. The interview analyses are complemented by the candidates' comments on the impressions they had tried to convey and the interviewers' comments about their impressions of the candidates. The analysis identifies two strategies whereby candidates may construct affiliation and solidarity with their interviewers: expressing their enthusiasm for and interest in their work and profession, and demonstrating their professional ability. It also highlights the damaging effect of expressing negative feelings and opinions.

[1]  Martha L. Komter,et al.  Conflict and cooperation in job interviews , 1991 .

[2]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[3]  S. Sarangi,et al.  ‘But are they one of us?’: Managing and evaluating identities in work-related contexts , 1995 .

[4]  C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni.  Quelle place pour les émotions dans la linguistique du XXe siècle ? Remarques et aperçus , 2000 .

[5]  F. Erickson,et al.  The counselor as gatekeeper : social interaction in interviews , 1982 .

[6]  C. Roberts,et al.  Keeping the gate: How judgements are made in interethnic interviews , 1987 .

[7]  V. Adelswärd.  Laughter and Dialogue: The Social Significance of Laughter in Institutional Discourse , 1989, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[8]  Julie Kerekes,et al.  The co-construction of a gatekeeping encounter: An inventory of verbal actions , 2007 .

[9]  Jann Scheuer.  Habitus as the principle for social practice: A proposal for critical discourse analysis , 2003, Language in Society.

[10]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[11]  Jeannett Martin.  Beyond Exchange : Appraisal Systems in English , 2000 .

[12]  David Rose,et al.  Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause , 2003 .

[13]  G. Kasper,et al.  Research Methods in Interlanguage Pragmatics , 1991, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[14]  Suzanne Eggins,et al.  An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 1994 .

[15]  Jann Scheuer,et al.  Recontextualization and Communicative Styles in Job Interviews , 2001 .

[16]  K. Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  The Language of Comembership. , 1993 .

[17]  Christine Béal.  ‘Its all in the asking’: A perspective on problems of cross-cultural communication between native speakers of French and native speakers of Australian English in the workplace , 1990 .

[18]  Elena Danielson,et al.  Appraisal , 1958, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[19]  S. Eggins,et al.  Analysing Casual Conversation , 1996 .

[20]  Julie Kerekes.  Winning an interviewer's trust in a gatekeeping encounter , 2006, Language in Society.

[21]  V. Adelswärd.  Styles of success : On impression management as collaborative action in job interviews , 1988 .

[22]  Susan Hood,et al.  Invocación de actitudes: El juego de la gradación de la valoración en el discurso , 2005 .