Use of biomimetic hexagonal surface texture in friction against lubricated skin

Smooth contact pads that evolved in insects, amphibians and mammals to enhance the attachment abilities of the animals' feet are often dressed with surface micropatterns of different shapes that act in the presence of a fluid secretion. One of the most striking surface patterns observed in contact pads of these animals is based on a hexagonal texture, which is recognized as a friction-oriented feature capable of suppressing both stick–slip and hydroplaning while enabling friction tuning. Here, we compare this design of natural friction surfaces to textures developed for working in similar conditions in disposable safety razors. When slid against lubricated human skin, the hexagonal surface texture is capable of generating about twice the friction of its technical competitors, which is related to it being much more effective at channelling of the lubricant fluid out of the contact zone. The draining channel shape and contact area fraction are found to be the most important geometrical parameters governing the fluid drainage rate.

[1]  Michael Varenberg,et al.  Tuning elastomer friction by hexagonal surface patterning , 2011 .

[2]  Lukas Stepien,et al.  Insights into the Adhesive Mechanisms of Tree Frogs using Artificial Mimics , 2013 .

[3]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Geometry-controlled adhesion: revisiting the contact splitting hypothesis , 2011 .

[4]  W. Barnes,et al.  Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  A. Crosby,et al.  Friction of soft elastomeric wrinkled surfaces , 2009 .

[6]  S. Gorb,et al.  Hexagonal Surface Micropattern for Dry and Wet Friction , 2009 .

[7]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Adhesion and allometry from metamorphosis to maturation in hylid tree frogs: a sticky problem , 2006 .

[8]  Alfred J. Crosby,et al.  Designing Bio‐Inspired Adhesives for Shear Loading: From Simple Structures to Complex Patterns , 2012 .

[9]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[10]  O. Reynolds.  I. On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil , 1886, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.

[11]  Annemarie Ohler,et al.  Digital Pad Morphology in Torrent-living Ranid Frogs , 1995 .

[12]  S. Gorb.  Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[13]  yderis p,et al.  ISI Web of Knowledge. , 2013 .

[14]  Dagmar Voigt,et al.  Tarsal morphology and attachment ability of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to smooth surfaces. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[15]  Chung-Yuen Hui,et al.  Adhesion, friction, and compliance of bio-mimetic and bio-inspired structured interfaces , 2011 .

[16]  S. Goodman,et al.  A new study on the structure and function of the adhesive organs of the Old World sucker-footed bat (Myzopoda: Myzopodidae) of Madagascar , 2011 .

[17]  B. Kennedy.  Structural trends in Bi containing pyrochlores: The structure of Bi2Rh2O7 − δ , 1997 .

[18]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Functional Surfaces in Biology: Mechanisms and Applications , 2006 .

[19]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Chemical composition of the attachment pad secretion of the locust Locusta migratoria. , 2002, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[20]  G. Hetsroni.  Handbook of hydraulic resistance , 1990 .

[21]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Sticky Feet: From Animals to Materials , 2007 .

[22]  Ulmar Grafe,et al.  Sticking under Wet Conditions: The Remarkable Attachment Abilities of the Torrent Frog, Staurois guttatus , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  S. Gorb,et al.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR TENACITY ENHANCEMENT BY DIVISION OF CONTACT AREA , 2004 .

[24]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny , 2001 .

[25]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  W. Barnes.  Functional Morphology and Design Constraints of Smooth Adhesive Pads , 2007 .

[27]  C. Greiner,et al.  SU-8: a photoresist for high-aspect-ratio and 3D submicron lithography , 2007 .

[28]  A. Jagota,et al.  Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1. Making contact , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  S. Gorb,et al.  Insect wet steps: loss of fluid from insect feet adhering to a substrate , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Visualisation of Native Surfaces by Two-Step Molding , 2007, Microscopy Today.

[31]  P. Alberch,et al.  Interdigital webbing and skin morphology in the neotropical salamander genus Bolitoglossa (amphibia; plethodontidae) , 1981, Journal of morphology.