Brain Injury Differences in Frontal Impact Crash Using Different Simulation Strategies

In the real world crashes, brain injury is one of the leading causes of deaths. Using isolated human head finite element (FE) model to study the brain injury patterns and metrics has been a simplified methodology widely adopted, since it costs significantly lower computation resources than a whole human body model does. However, the degree of precision of this simplification remains questionable. This study compared these two kinds of methods: (1) using a whole human body model carried on the sled model and (2) using an isolated head model with prescribed head motions, to study the brain injury. The distribution of the von Mises stress (VMS), maximum principal strain (MPS), and cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) was used to compare the two methods. The results showed that the VMS of brain mainly concentrated at the lower cerebrum and occipitotemporal region close to the cerebellum. The isolated head modelling strategy predicted higher levels of MPS and CSDM 5%, while the difference is small in CSDM 10% comparison. It suggests that isolated head model may not equivalently reflect the strain levels below the 10% compared to the whole human body model.

[1]  J. Borg,et al.  Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  Using THUMS for pedestrian safety simulations , 2006 .

[3]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Development of Next Generation Human Body FE Model Capable of Organ Injury Prediction , 2009 .

[4]  D. Meaney,et al.  Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  King H. Yang,et al.  Investigation of Head Injury Mechanisms Using Neutral Density Technology and High-Speed Biplanar X-ray. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[6]  M. Craig,et al.  Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). , 2013, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Brain strains in vehicle impact tests. , 2006, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[8]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Airbag effectiveness on brain trauma in frontal crashes. , 2000, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[9]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Shigeta 1 DEVELOPMENT OF NEXT GENERATION HUMAN FE MODEL CAPABLE OF ORGAN INJURY PREDICTION , 2009 .

[10]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[11]  S. Shrivastava,et al.  Global plan for the decade of action for road safety: Expectations from developing nations , 2014 .

[12]  A. Nahum,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact , 1977 .

[13]  Songbai Ji,et al.  A Pre-computed Brain Response Atlas for Instantaneous Strain Estimation in Contact Sports , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  H. Kimpara,et al.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Predictors Based on Angular Accelerations During Impacts , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Investigation of anteroposterior head-neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain-spinal cord complex FE model. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[16]  Yuko Nakahira,et al.  Head Injury Prediction Methods Based on 6 Degree of Freedom Head Acceleration Measurements during Impact , 2011 .

[17]  W. Goldsmith,et al.  Impact on a model head-helmet system , 1974 .

[18]  James P. Gaewsky,et al.  Finite Element Human Body Model Thorax Response Validation With Matched Experimental Tests , 2013 .

[19]  A I King,et al.  Mathematical modelling, simulation and experimental testing of biomechanical system crash response. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.