The influence of landscape characteristics and home-range size on the quantification of landscape-genetics relationships

A common approach used to estimate landscape resistance involves comparing correlations of ecological and genetic distances calculated among individuals of a species. However, the location of sampled individuals may contain some degree of spatial uncertainty due to the natural variation of animals moving through their home range or measurement error in plant or animal locations. In this study, we evaluate the ways that spatial uncertainty, landscape characteristics, and genetic stochasticity interact to influence the strength and variability of conclusions about landscape-genetics relationships. We used a neutral landscape model to generate 45 landscapes composed of habitat and non-habitat, varying in percent habitat, aggregation, and structural connectivity (patch cohesion). We created true and alternate locations for 500 individuals, calculated ecological distances (least-cost paths), and simulated genetic distances among individuals. We compared correlations between ecological distances for true and alternate locations. We then simulated genotypes at 15 neutral loci and investigated whether the same influences could be detected in simple Mantel tests and while controlling for the effects of isolation-by-distance using the partial Mantel test. Spatial uncertainty interacted with the percentage of habitat in the landscape, but led to only small reductions in correlations. Furthermore, the strongest correlations occurred with low percent habitat, high aggregation, and low to intermediate levels of cohesion. Overall genetic stochasticity was relatively low and was influenced by landscape characteristics.

[1]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Genetic diversity, but not hatching success, is jointly affected by postglacial colonization and isolation in the threatened frog, Rana latastei , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Lynn Y. Huynh,et al.  Habitat barriers limit gene flow and illuminate historical events in a wide‐ranging carnivore, the American puma , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[3]  K. Jerina,et al.  Mating-related movements of male brown bears on the periphery of an expanding population , 2010 .

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[5]  Rob Roy Ramey,et al.  Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep , 2005 .

[6]  Jean Paul Metzger,et al.  Habitat fragmentation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity among toad populations in the Brazilian Atlantic Coastal Forest , 2009 .

[7]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Gene Flow in Complex Landscapes: Testing Multiple Hypotheses with Causal Modeling , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[8]  H. Jacquemyn,et al.  Genetic structure of the forest herb Primula elatior in a changing landscape , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[9]  S. Cushman,et al.  Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[10]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges , 2010, Conservation Genetics.

[11]  J. Evans,et al.  Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. , 2010, Ecology.

[12]  Sandro Lovari,et al.  Going Out to Mate: Excursion Behaviour of Female Roe Deer , 2008 .

[13]  Aurélie Coulon,et al.  Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  RULE: Map Generation and a Spatial Analysis Program , 1999 .

[15]  S. Cushman,et al.  Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[16]  M. Fortin,et al.  Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[17]  Helene H. Wagner,et al.  Landscape Genetics , 2008 .

[18]  S. Cushman,et al.  cdpop: A spatially explicit cost distance population genetics program , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[19]  Nathan H. Schumaker,et al.  Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity , 1996 .

[20]  Robert H. Gardner,et al.  Landscape ecological analysis : issues and applications , 1999 .

[21]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[22]  H. Akaike.  INFORMATION THEORY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 1973 .

[23]  S. Cushman,et al.  Simulating the effects of climate change on population connectivity of American marten (Martes americana) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites , 1994, Nature.

[25]  G. Luikart,et al.  Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[26]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[27]  N. Mantel.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[28]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics , 2007 .

[29]  David O. Wallin,et al.  Spatial scaling and multi-model inference in landscape genetics: Martes americana in northern Idaho , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Naiara Pinto,et al.  Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[31]  T. Wiegand,et al.  The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red‐cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[32]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[33]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics , 2003 .

[34]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Modelling functional landscape connectivity from genetic population structure: a new spatially explicit approach , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[35]  B. Mcrae,et al.  ISOLATION BY RESISTANCE , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  Tarmo K. Remmel,et al.  On the role of spatial stochastic models in understanding landscape indices in ecology , 2003 .

[37]  L. Waits,et al.  Landscape genetics: where are we now? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[38]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  The ecodist Package for Dissimilarity-based Analysis of Ecological Data , 2007 .

[39]  G. Luikart,et al.  Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[40]  M. Fortin,et al.  Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[41]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Representing genetic variation as continuous surfaces: An approach for identifying spatial dependency in landscape genetic studies , 2008 .

[42]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[43]  L. Waits,et al.  Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics , 2007, Heredity.

[44]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[45]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  N. Morellet,et al.  Ranging behaviour and excursions of female roe deer during the rut , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[47]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Separating the effects of habitat area, fragmentation and matrix resistance on genetic differentiation in complex landscapes , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  P. Smouse,et al.  Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  Neil J. Anderson,et al.  Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. , 2009, Ecology.