Global Education Access Utilizing Partnerships and Networked Global Learning Communities

Networked global learning communities build partnership programs between higher education institutions and high schools which allow students, teachers and professors to attend and work in college preparation programs located in countries outside of their native lands. These educational programs help to promote development of transnational policies and procedure reforms to provide access to universities in other countries, as well as provide exposure to global learning strategies, structures, and emerging technologies among teachers and educational leadership. Transnational High School-University Bridge programs also allow the student to adjust to a new culture and work to improve their second language skills, while potentially earning college credit in a dual credit, high school environment.

[1]  M. Oliva.  Latino Access to College: Actualizing the Promise and Potential of K-16 Partnerships , 2008 .

[2]  Fareed Zakaria,et al.  The Post-American World , 2008 .

[3]  Transforming Chinese teachers' thinking, learning and understanding via e‐learning , 2006 .

[4]  Mimi Miyoung Lee.  ‘Making it relevant’: a rural teacher’s integration of an international studies program , 2007 .

[5]  Nicole A. Buzzetto-More.  Navigating the Virtual Forest: How Networked Digital Technologies Can Foster Transgeographic Learning , 2006 .

[6]  Richard Halverson,et al.  Systems of Practice: How Leaders Use Artifacts to Create Professional Community in Schools , 2003 .

[7]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Do High School Students Benefit from the Children's Internet Protection Act? , 2010 .

[8]  Peter J. Hawrylak,et al.  Using Hybrid Attack Graphs to Model and Analyze Attacks against the Critical Information Infrastructure , 2013 .

[9]  Robert Z. Zheng,et al.  Presentation of Complex Medical Information: Interaction Between Concept Maps and Spatial Ability on Deep Learning , 2012, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[10]  J. Cummins,et al.  Brave New Schools: Challenging Cultural Illiteracy Through Global Learning Networks , 1995 .

[11]  M. Suárez-Orozco,et al.  Wanted: Global Citizens. , 2007 .

[12]  Maria Lexhagen.  The search and purchase process among e-travel customers , 2012 .

[13]  Rotimi Taiwo,et al.  Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction , 2010 .

[14]  Elizabeth Hendrickson,et al.  It Was Only Natural: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to a CMC Study , 2010 .

[15]  John Wedman,et al.  Building Cross Cultural Partnerships Through the Internet: What Works and What Doesn't , 2004 .

[16]  Despo Ktoridou,et al.  Enhancing Dynamic-Content Courses with Student-Oriented Learning Strategies: The Case of Computer Security Course , 2012, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[17]  L. Tornatzky,et al.  College Knowledge: What Latino Parents Need To Know and Why They Don't Know It. , 2002 .

[18]  Tuomo Kakkonen,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior Students ’ Cyber-Plagiarism , 2011 .

[19]  R. Kazis,et al.  Double the Numbers: Increasing Postsecondary Credentials for Underrepresented Youth. , 2004 .

[20]  Stephen Asunka,et al.  Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism in Online Courses: A Design-Based Research Approach , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[21]  S. Tang.  The dynamics of school‐based learning in initial teacher education , 2004 .

[22]  Robert Zheng,et al.  Adolescent Online Social Communication and Behavior: Relationship Formation on the Internet , 2009 .

[23]  R. Bashshur,et al.  Telemedicine as a Modality of Health Care Delivery and its Implications , 2012 .

[24]  Najat Smeda,et al.  Digital Storytelling with Web 2.0 Tools for Collaborative Learning , 2012 .

[25]  Rita S. Mano.  Gender Effects on Managerial Communication and Work Performance , 2013, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[26]  Amaury Nora,et al.  The Influence of Academic and Environmental Factors on Hispanic College Degree Attainment , 2007 .