Technology learning in a global –local perspective: - the interplay between technology diffusion, niche markets and experience curves

In this paper it is argued that technology learning may be both a barrier and an incentive for technology change in the national energy system. The possibility to realize an ambitious global emission reduction scenario is enhanced by coordinated action between countries in national policy implementation. An indicator for coordinated action is suggested. Targeted measures to increase deployment of nascent energy technologies and increasing energy efficiency in a small open economy like Norway are examined. The measures are evaluated against a set of baselines with different levels of spillover of technology learning from the global market. It is found that implementation of technology subsidies increase the national contribution to early deployment independent of the level of spillover. In a special case with no spillover for offshore floating wind power and endogenous technology learning substantial subsidy or a learning rate of 20% is required. Combining the high learning rate and a national subsidy increases the contribution to early deployment. Enhanced building code on the other hand may reduce Norway's contribution to early deployment, and thus the realization of a global emission reduction scenario, unless sufficient electricity export capacity is assured. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[2]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[3]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  MESSAGE-MACRO: Linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively , 2000 .

[4]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Technological paradigms, patterns of learning and development: An introductory roadmap , 1995 .

[5]  Francisco J. Varela Two Principles for Self-Organization , 1984 .

[6]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The impact of EU policies on energy use in and the evolution of the UK built environment , 2008 .

[7]  Leslie G. Fishbone,et al.  Markal, a linear‐programming model for energy systems analysis: Technical description of the bnl version , 1981 .

[8]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling , 1998 .

[9]  A. Stromman,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Second Generation Bioethanols Produced From Scandinavian Boreal Forest Resources , 2009 .

[10]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Experiments with a Hybrid CGE-MARKAL Model1 , 2006 .

[11]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[12]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[13]  Mark Jaccard,et al.  Towards General Equilibrium in a Technology-Rich Model with Empirically Estimated Behavioral Parameters , 2006 .

[14]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments , 2008 .

[15]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MARKAL-MACRO: A linked model for energy-economy analysis , 1992 .

[16]  P. Dicken Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[17]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Learning in renewable energy technology development , 2001 .

[18]  Clas-Otto Wene,et al.  ASSESSING NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES USING AN ENERGY SYSTEM MODEL WITH ENDOGENIZED EXPERIENCE CURVES , 1997 .

[19]  Tor A Johnsen,et al.  Norwegian Residential Energy Demand: Coordinated use of a System Engineering and a Macroeconomic Model , 1996 .

[20]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Emissions trading and technology deployment in an energy-systems "bottom-up" model with technology learning , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  T. Martinsen Global technology learning and national policy--An incentive scheme for governments to assume the high cost of early deployment exemplified by Norway , 2010 .

[22]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the innovation Modeling Comparison Project , 2006 .

[23]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .