Seeing is not stereotyping: the functional independence of categorization and stereotype activation

Abstract Social categorization has been viewed as necessarily resulting in stereotyping, yet extant research suggests the two processes are differentially sensitive to task manipulations. Here, we simultaneously test the degree to which race perception and stereotyping are conditionally automatic. Participants performed a sequential priming task while either explicitly attending to the race of face primes or directing attention away from their semantic nature. We find a dissociation between the perceptual encoding of race and subsequent activation of associated stereotypes, with race perception occurring in both task conditions, but implicit stereotyping occurring only when attention is directed to the race of the face primes. These results support a clear conceptual distinction between categorization and stereotyping and show that the encoding of racial category need not result in stereotype activation.

[1]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Rapid social perception is flexible: approach and avoidance motivational states shape P100 responses to other-race faces , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[3]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling Racial Prejudice , 2005, Psychological science.

[4]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[5]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  The Neural Substrates of In-Group Bias , 2008, Psychological science.

[7]  P. Thagard,et al.  FORMING IMPRESSIONS FROM STEREOTYPES, TRAITS, AND BEHAVIORS : A PARALLEL-CONSTRAINT-SATISFACTION THEORY , 1996 .

[8]  N. Ambady,et al.  A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. , 2011, Psychological review.

[9]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  On the Activation of Social Stereotypes: The Moderating Role of Processing Objectives , 1997 .

[10]  T. Ito,et al.  Rapid race perception despite individuation and accuracy goals , 2017, Social neuroscience.

[11]  T. Ito,et al.  Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Jasmin Cloutier,et al.  On Construing Others: Category and Stereotype Activation from Facial Cues , 2006 .

[13]  T. Ito,et al.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[14]  T. Ito,et al.  Ambiguity and the Timecourse of Racial Perception , 2006 .

[15]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[17]  Joshua Correll,et al.  Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control , 2006 .

[18]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[19]  T. Ito,et al.  Multiple Cues in Social Perception: The Time Course of Processing Race and Facial Expression. , 2007, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[20]  Tiffany A Ito,et al.  Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170's sensitivity to race. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[21]  D. Amodio,et al.  Economic scarcity alters the perception of race , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  M. Banaji,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming , 1996 .

[23]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[25]  Bruce D. Bartholow,et al.  The neural correlates of race , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  C. Judd,et al.  Spontaneous prejudice in context: variability in automatically activated attitudes. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  J. Bargh.  The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. , 1999 .

[28]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[29]  C. Macrae,et al.  A face with a cue: exploring the inevitability of person categorization , 2007 .

[30]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[31]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. , 1991 .

[32]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Person Categorization and Automatic Racial Stereotyping Effects on Weapon Identification , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[33]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[34]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations☆ , 1986 .

[35]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[36]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[37]  J. Bargh.  Automatic and conscious processing of social information. , 1984 .

[38]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  On the Nature of Gender Categorization , 2012 .

[39]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[40]  C. Judd,et al.  Automatic stereotypes vs. automatic prejudice: Sorting out the possibilities in the Payne (2001) weapon paradigm ☆ , 2004 .

[41]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[42]  C. Judd,et al.  The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  T. Ito,et al.  A Foot in Both Worlds: Asian Americans' Perceptions of Asian, White, and Racially Ambiguous Faces , 2008 .

[44]  T. Ito,et al.  The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: changes in perception and evaluation. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.