Aerodynamic characteristics of wind turbine blades with a sinusoidal leading edge

The aerodynamic characteristics of a kind of bionic wind turbine blades with a sinusoidal leading edge have been investigated in this paper based on a three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation. The calculated results show that compared with a straight leading-edge blade, the new-type blade has a great improvement in shaft torque at high wind speeds. The localized vortices shedding from the leading-edge tubercles, which can generate a much greater peak of the leading-edge suction pressure than that from the straight leading-edge case, are the physical essentials to enhance the wavy blade's aerodynamic performances as the blade goes into stall. In particular, the outboard segment from the 60%R station to the blade tip is the key region for wavy leading-edge blades to improve the aerodynamic characteristics at high-speed inflows. In this key region, a wavy blade can obtain a greater power output as the wavelength l and the waveheight δ increase. The present numerical results also show that the wavy leading-edge shape is unfavorable for a wind turbine blade under the design conditions (e.g., at the rated wind speed). At these conditions, an early boundary-layer separation as a result of the geometric disturbances of the leading-edge tubercles will inevitably result in a visible shaft-torque reduction in the wavy-blade cases. Anyway, the wavy blades still tend to generate a more robust power output as a whole from 10 to 20 m s −1 than the original NREL phase-VI blade. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  F. Fish,et al.  Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers , 2004 .

[2]  Donald Rockwell,et al.  Control of vortical structures on a flapping wing via a sinusoidal leading-edge , 2010 .

[3]  Maureen Hand,et al.  Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Con gurations and Available Data Campaigns , 2001 .

[4]  Jinhee Jeong,et al.  On the identification of a vortex , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Elizabeth Bradley,et al.  Going with (or Against) the Flow , 2008, Science.

[6]  C. P. van Dam,et al.  Computational aerodynamic analysis of a blunt trailing‐edge airfoil modification to the NREL Phase VI rotor , 2007 .

[7]  Scott Schreck,et al.  Detached‐eddy simulation of flow around the NREL Phase VI blade , 2002 .

[8]  Laurens E Howle,et al.  Lift and drag performance of odontocete cetacean flippers , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[9]  D. M. Bushnell,et al.  DRAG REDUCTION IN NATURE , 1991 .

[10]  Niels N. Sørensen,et al.  Navier-Stokes predictions of the NREL phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80-by-120 wind tunnel , 2002 .

[11]  F. Fish,et al.  Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[12]  Jiezhi Wu,et al.  A vorticity dynamics theory of three-dimensional flow separation , 2000 .

[13]  Laurens E Howle,et al.  Hydrodynamic flow control in marine mammals. , 2008, Integrative and comparative biology.

[14]  Hui Zhao,et al.  Turbulent drag reduction by traveling wave of flexible wall , 2003 .

[15]  G. Lauder,et al.  Passive and Active Flow Control by Swimming Fishes and Mammals , 2006 .