A method for assessing environmental risk: A case study of Green Bay, Lake Michigan, USA

The Science Advisory Board of the US Environmental Protection Agency has recommended that risk reduction strategies become the centerpiece of environmental protection. The goal in developing such strategies is to identify opportunities for greatest reduction of ecological risks. This is a perspective that is significantly more comprehensive than the traditional focus on human health risks arising from environmental degradation. The identification of ecological risks upon which environmental protection efforts should be focused requires an ecological risk assessment methodology that is based on anthropogenic stressors affecting an ecosystem and a set of impaired use criteria. A methodology based on this concept is developed and discussed in this article. The methodology requires that risk values be assigned to each ecosystem stressor-impaired use pair that reflect the degree to which the given stressor contributes to ecosystem risk as measured by the given impaired use criterion. Once these data are available, mathematical analyses based on concepts from fuzzy set theory are performed to obtain a ranking of ecosystem stressors. The methodology has been tested by applying it to a case study involving Green Bay of Lake Michigan. A workshop was held in which 11 persons with extensive knowledge of the Green Bay ecosystem determined risk values through a group-consensus process. The analytical portion of the methodology was then used to rank the ecosystem risks (stressors) from several perspectives, including prevention management and remediation management. The overall conclusion of the workshop participants was that the fuzzy set decision model is a useful and effective methodology for differentiating environmental risk.

[1]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity , 1985 .

[2]  G. Ankley,et al.  Identification of ammonia as an important sediment‐associated toxicant in the lower fox River and green bay, Wisconsin , 1990 .

[3]  Hallett J. Harris,et al.  Coupling ecosystem science with management: A Great Lakes perspective from Green Bay, Lake Michigan, USA , 1987 .

[4]  P. Diesing,et al.  Reason in society , 1962 .

[5]  M. Slimak,et al.  Ecotoxicity and ecological risk assessment. Regulatory applications at EPA. Part 1 , 1990 .

[6]  D. Schindler,et al.  Effects of Acid Rain on Freshwater Ecosystems , 1988, Science.

[7]  Challenges in the Detection and Diagnosis of Pathological Change in Aquatic Ecosystems , 1990 .

[8]  R. P. Canale,et al.  Identification of Critical Nutrient Levels through Field Verification of Models for Phosphorus and Phytoplankton Growth , 1986 .

[9]  H. Regier,et al.  Ecosystem Behavior Under Stress , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Vallentyne,et al.  International Joint Commission (Canada/United States): Annual Review of Progress under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972—held in Windsor, Ontario, 17–20 July 1978 , 1978, Environmental Conservation.

[11]  S. Haseltine,et al.  Organochlorine and metal residues in eggs of waterfowl nesting on islands in Lake Michigan off Door County, Wisconsin, 1977-78. , 1981, Pesticides monitoring journal.

[12]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  Risk within reason. , 1990, Science.

[13]  A J Krupnick,et al.  Controlling urban air pollution: a benefit-cost assessment. , 1991, Science.

[14]  Lynn A. Maguire.  Risk Analysis for Conservation Biologists , 1991 .

[15]  Eugene P. Odum,et al.  Trends Expected in Stressed Ecosystems , 1985 .

[16]  David J. Schaeffer,et al.  Ecosystem health: I. Measuring ecosystem health , 1988 .

[17]  S. Haseltine,et al.  Contaminant levels in colonial waterbirds from Green Bay and Lake Michigan, 1975–80 , 1985, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[18]  Lawrence M. Smith,et al.  Microcontaminants and reproductive impairment of the Forster's tern on Green Bay, Lake Michigan-1983 , 1989, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[19]  H. Regier,et al.  Ecotoxicology and ecosystem integrity: the Great Lakes examined. Part 4 , 1990 .

[20]  Hallett J. Harris,et al.  Evolution of water resource management: a Laurentian great lakes case study , 1987 .

[21]  Ecological Rationality: Reason and Environmental Policy , 1986 .

[22]  G. Warren,et al.  Assessment and Management of Fish Community Health in the Great Lakes: Synthesis and Recommendations , 1990 .

[23]  S. Richman,et al.  Functional Interaction of Phytoplankton and Zooplankton along the Trophic Gradient in Green Bay, Lake Michigan , 1991 .

[24]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Control of Lake ProductivityLarge-scale experimental manipulations reveal complex interactions among lake organisms , 1988 .

[25]  Yue Rong,et al.  Two fuzzy set models for comprehensive environmental decision-making , 1987 .