Traffic locus of control, driving skills, and attitudes towards in-vehicle technologies (ISA and ACC)

Drivers' acceptance of in-vehicle technologies is influenced by individual differences in user characteristics. Locus of control (LOC) can be assumed to be one of the most crucial psychological factors determining a drivers' acceptance to new in-vehicle technologies. Internals may, for instance, choose to rely on their own driving skills and abilities rather than on in-vehicle technologies and try to maintain their direct involvement with the driving task. It is also known that intention, which is influenced by attitudes, is the main predictor of behaviours (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). It was, therefore, hypothesized that drivers who got high scores on internal (self subscale of T-LOC) locus of control subscale and perceptual motor skills would have a negative attitude to using in-vehicle technologies (ISA and ACC). In the present study, 208 participants (36 female and 172 male) completed a form including the Driver Skill Inventory (DSI), Multidimensional Traffic Locus of Control Scale (T-LOC), Technical Devices Attitude Scale (TDAS), and items related to drivers' driving records and demographics. The results showed that high safety skills and external orientation seems to be important factors for having positive attitudes towards in-vehicle technologies. However, drivers with high self-reported perceptual motor skills might tend to resist in-vehicle technologies. For the covering abstract see ITRD E137489.

[1]  Türker Özkan,et al.  Multidimensional Traffic Locus of Control Scale (T-LOC): factor structure and relationship to risky driving , 2005 .

[2]  Mark P. Haselkorn,et al.  Ergonomics and safety of intelligent driver interfaces , 1998 .

[3]  O M J Carsten,et al.  Intelligent speed adaptation: accident savings and cost-benefit analysis. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Kenneth A. Wallston,et al.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales , 1978, Health education monographs.

[5]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[6]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  Investigation of Behavioral Adaptation to Lane Departure Warnings , 2002 .

[7]  Mark P. Haselkorn Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, edited by Y. Ian Noy , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  P Fancher,et al.  Intelligent Cruise Control Field Operational Test , 1997 .

[9]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[10]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments , 1995 .

[11]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC) , 1998 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[13]  H. Lefcourt,et al.  Research With the Locus of Control Construct , 1981 .

[14]  E. J. Phares Locus of control in personality , 1976 .

[15]  H. Levenson 2 – DIFFERENTIATING AMONG INTERNALITY, POWERFUL OTHERS, AND CHANCE , 1981 .

[16]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[17]  W. Arthur,et al.  Prediction of Vehicular Accident Involvement: A Meta-Analysis , 1991 .

[18]  Michael F. Hoyt,et al.  Internal-External Control and beliefs about automobile travel , 1973 .

[19]  Dennis Doverspike,et al.  Locus of control and auditory selective attention as predictors of driving accident involvement: A comparative longitudinal investigation☆ , 1992 .

[20]  T. Rundmo,et al.  Personality, risky driving and accident involvement among Norwegian drivers , 2002 .

[21]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SEAT BELT USE IN FAMILIES , 1972 .

[22]  J A Michan Generic intelligent driver support: a comprehensive report on GIDS , 1993 .

[23]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in Drivers' self-assessments of their perceptual-motor and safety skills: Australians and Finns , 1998 .

[24]  A. Comrey,et al.  Internality and externality as correlates of involvement in fatal driving accidents. , 1987, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Timo Lajunen,et al.  Asymmetric relationship between driving and safety skills. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.