Rectal tumour staging: MR imaging using pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils vs endoscopic ultrasonography

Abstract. The aim of this study was to compare MR imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the local staging of rectal tumours. Forty-nine patients were examined on a 1.5-T MR unit using either a pelvic phased-array coil (n = 37) alone or combined with an endorectal coil (n = 12). Sagittal and axial sequences with T2-weighted fast spin-echo and axial T1-weighted spin-echo techniques were employed. The EUS technique was performed using a flexible endosonoscope. The results were compared with findings at histopathological sectioning of the specimen. The T-stage on MR correlated with histopathology in 32 of 49 patients and on EUS in 29 of 49 patients. The N-stage on MR correlated with histopathology in 22 of 49 patients and on EUS in 26 of 49 patients. Tumour penetration of the rectal wall was predicted by MR with 86 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity, and by EUS with 89 % sensitivity and 33 % specificity. Preoperative radiotherapy was administered to 40 of the patients after the examinations which may explain some of the overstaging by MR and EUS. Three patients with surgically and histopathologically confirmed invasion of neighbouring organs in the pelvis were detected preoperatively on MR but none on EUS. Tumour penetration of the rectal wall and local lymph node metastases cannot accurately be predicted with MR or EUS. Magnetic resonance, however, seems to be more useful for preoperative identification of clinically occult advanced disease.

[1]  S. Watzka,et al.  Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer , 2005 .

[2]  E. Rosato,et al.  Rectal carcinoma: staging at MR imaging with endorectal surface coil. Work in progress. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  A. Sézeur,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. , 1990, Archives of surgery.

[4]  D. Ott,et al.  Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopic rectal sonography , 1997, Journal of surgical oncology.

[5]  R. Kane,et al.  Pitfalls and sources of error in staging rectal cancer with endorectal us. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  G. Krestin,et al.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. , 1995, Endoscopy.

[7]  P. Fockens,et al.  Assessment of tumor infiltration depth in rectal cancer with transrectal sonography: caution is necessary. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  E E de Lange,et al.  Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  F. Joosten,et al.  Staging of Rectal Carcinoma Using MR Double Surface Coil, MR Endorectal Coil, and Intrarectal Ultrasound: Correlation with Histopathologic Findings , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Staging of Rectal Carcinoma: Prospective Comparison of Endorectal US and CT , 1989 .

[11]  G. Feifel,et al.  Assessment of Depth of Invasion in Rectal Cancer by Endosonography , 1987, Endoscopy.

[12]  L. Påhlman,et al.  Computed Tomography in Staging of Rectal Carcinoma , 1985, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[13]  A G Maier,et al.  Peritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  R. Beart,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging , 1986, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  B. McNeil,et al.  CT and MR imaging in the staging of colorectal carcinoma: report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group II. , 1996, Radiology.

[16]  S. Edge,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma with MR imaging: surgical and histopathologic correlation. , 1990, Radiology.

[17]  P. Quirke,et al.  Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer , 1994, The Lancet.

[18]  W. Pegios,et al.  Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  P. Elvin,et al.  Rectal cancer: evaluation of staging with endosonography. , 1997, Radiology.

[20]  P. Quirke,et al.  Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer , 1988, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  G. Krestin.  Is magnetic resonance imaging the method of choice in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal carcinoma? , 1997, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  L. Blomqvist,et al.  Rectal tumours — MR imaging with endorectal and/or phased-array coils, and histopathological staging on giant sections , 1997, Acta radiologica.

[23]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Short-term preoperative radiotherapy results in down-staging of rectal cancer: a study of 1316 patients. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  V. Tombolini,et al.  Comparison between transrectal ultrasonography and computed tomography with rectal inflation of gas in preoperative staging of lower rectal cancer. , 1997, European radiology.

[25]  E. Furth,et al.  Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  M. Hadfield,et al.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging with a pelvic phased‐array coil , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  P. Goddard,et al.  Pre‐Operative assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer: Digital examination, endoluminal sonography or computed tomography? , 1986, The British journal of surgery.