Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy.

The successful detection of a target in a radiological search can reduce the detectability of a second target, a phenomenon termed satisfaction of search (SOS). Given the potential consequences, here we investigate the generality of SOS with the goal of simultaneously informing radiology, cognitive psychology, and nonmedical searches such as airport luggage screening. Ten experiments utilizing nonmedical searches and untrained searchers suggest that SOS is affected by a diverse array of factors, including (1) the relative frequency of different target types, (2) external pressures (reward and time), and (3) expectations about the number of targets present. Collectively, these experiments indicate that SOS arises when searchers have a biased expectation about the low likelihood of specific targets or events, and when they are under pressure to perform efficiently. This first demonstration of SOS outside of radiology implicates a general heuristic applicable to many kinds of searches. In an example like airport luggage screening, the current data suggest that the detection of an easy-to-spot target (e.g., a water bottle) might reduce detection of a hard-to-spot target (e.g., a box cutter).

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , 2009 .

[2]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Visual search for multiple targets. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  R. Carter Visual search with color. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Ian Lewis,et al.  Proceedings of the SPIE , 2012 .

[7]  L. Li,et al.  Searching for One Versus Two Identical Targets: When Visual Search Has a Memory , 2000, Psychological science.

[8]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Visual Skills in Airport-Security Screening , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd : An anger superiority effect , 1988 .

[10]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[11]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[12]  Jason S. McCarley,et al.  Oculomotor Scanning and Target Recognition in Luggage X-ray Screening. , 2004 .

[13]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Visual search has no memory , 1998, Nature.

[14]  R. Demay,et al.  Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. , 1997, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[15]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[16]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[17]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  Alastair G. Gale,et al.  Is airport baggage inspection just another medical image? , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[19]  H L Kundel,et al.  Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs. , 1995, Radiology.

[20]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Darcy Wolfman,et al.  Satisfaction of search in osteoradiology. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[23]  Kate E. Stewart,et al.  Can ’ t Buy Me Love , 2022 .

[24]  Kevin S. Berbaum,et al.  Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect , 1994, Emergency Radiology.

[25]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  26.5 brief comms NEW , 2005 .

[26]  W. J. Tuddenham Visual search, image organization, and reader error in roentgen diagnosis. Studies of the psycho-physiology of roentgen image perception. , 1962, Radiology.

[27]  Shankar Raman,et al.  Can't Buy Me Love: , 2001 .

[28]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  S. Mitroff,et al.  Rare Targets Are Rarely Missed in Correctable Search , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  Pixel independence: measuring spatial interactions on a CRT display. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[32]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[34]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[35]  K S Berbaum,et al.  Cause of satisfaction of search effects in contrast studies of the abdomen. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[36]  EDMUND A. FRANKEN,et al.  Satisfaction of Search in the Detection of Plain-Film Abnormalities in Abdominal Contrast Studies , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[37]  R. Demay The art & science of cytopathology , 1996 .

[38]  Kyle R. Cave,et al.  Costs in Searching for Two Targets: Dividing Search Across Target Types Could Improve Airport Security Screening , 2007 .

[39]  Allen L. Nagy,et al.  Distractor heterogeneity, attention, and color in visual search , 2003, Vision Research.

[40]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[41]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Specific-token effects in screening tasks: possible implications for aviation security. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  Yuji Takeda,et al.  Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memory-based control of attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[45]  A. Thor,et al.  The art and science of cytopathology: Richard M. DeMay, MD. Chicago IL, ASCP Press, 1996, 2 vol set, 1,289 pages, $285 , 1996 .

[46]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Visual search is not blind to emotion , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  C. Körner,et al.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search , 2007, Psychological research.

[48]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The Effects of Psychologically Based Intervention Programs on Worker Productivity: A Meta-Analysis. , 1985 .

[49]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Increasing Efficiency In Airport Security Screening , 2004, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment.