Reduction of the Adjoint Gradient Formula in the Continuous Limit

We present a new continuous adjoint method for aerodynamic shape optimization using the Euler equations, which reduces the computational cost of the gradients by reducing the volume integral part of the adjoint gradient formula to a surface integral. The savings are particularly significant for three-dimensional aerodynamic shape optimization problems on general unstructured and overset meshes. In order to validate the concept, the new gradient equations have been tested for various aerodynamic shape optimization problems, including an inverse problem for threedimensional wing configurations, and drag minimization problems of a single-element airfoil and a three-dimensional wing-fuselage configuration. In order to assess their accuracy, the results are compared with finite-difference gradients, complex-step gradients, and gradients calculated by the previous adjoint method which includes a volume integral. ∗Thomas V. Jones Professor of Engineering, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, AIAA Fellow †Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, AIAA Member

[1]  A. Jameson,et al.  STUDIES OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACHES TO VISCOUS AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION , 2001 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  AN AUTOMATED METHOD FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING COMPLEX VARIABLES , 2000 .

[3]  A. Jameson,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE CONTINUOUS AND DISCRETE ADJOINT APPROACH TO AUTOMATIC AERODYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION , 2000 .

[4]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  A gradient accuracy study for the adjoint-based Navier-Stokes design method , 1999 .

[5]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint equations in CFD: duality, boundary conditions and solution behaviour , 1997 .

[6]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Re-engineering the design process through computation , 1997 .

[7]  M. J. Rimlinger,et al.  Constrained Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using an Adjoint Formulation and Parallel Computers , 1997 .

[8]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured grids with a continuous adjoint formulation , 1997 .

[9]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  An Efficient Multiblock Method for Aerodynamic Analysis and Design on Distributed Memory Systems , 1997 .

[10]  Juan J. Alonso,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Supersonic Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation on Parallel Computers , 1996 .

[11]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation , 1996 .

[12]  A. Jameson Optimum aerodynamic design using CFD and control theory , 1995 .

[13]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[14]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..

[15]  O. Pironneau Optimal Shape Design for Elliptic Systems , 1983 .

[16]  J. N. Lyness,et al.  Numerical Differentiation of Analytic Functions , 1967 .