CODE’s new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination

The Empirical CODE Orbit Model (ECOM) of the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), which was developed in the early 1990s, is widely used in the International GNSS Service (IGS) community. For a rather long time, spurious spectral lines are known to exist in geophysical parameters, in particular in the Earth Rotation Parameters (ERPs) and in the estimated geocenter coordinates, which could recently be attributed to the ECOM. These effects grew creepingly with the increasing influence of the GLONASS system in recent years in the CODE analysis, which is based on a rigorous combination of GPS and GLONASS since May 2003. In a first step we show that the problems associated with the ECOM are to the largest extent caused by the GLONASS, which was reaching full deployment by the end of 2011. GPS-only, GLONASS-only, and combined GPS/GLONASS solutions using the observations in the years 2009–2011 of a global network of 92 combined GPS/GLONASS receivers were analyzed for this purpose. In a second step we review direct solar radiation pressure (SRP) models for GNSS satellites. We demonstrate that only even-order short-period harmonic perturbations acting along the direction Sun-satellite occur for GPS and GLONASS satellites, and only odd-order perturbations acting along the direction perpendicular to both, the vector Sun-satellite and the spacecraft’s solar panel axis. Based on this insight we assess in the third step the performance of four candidate orbit models for the future ECOM. The geocenter coordinates, the ERP differences w. r. t. the IERS 08 C04 series of ERPs, the misclosures for the midnight epochs of the daily orbital arcs, and scale parameters of Helmert transformations for station coordinates serve as quality criteria. The old and updated ECOM are validated in addition with satellite laser ranging (SLR) observations and by comparing the orbits to those of the IGS and other analysis centers. Based on all tests, we present a new extended ECOM which substantially reduces the spurious signals in the geocenter coordinate $$z$$z (by about a factor of 2–6), reduces the orbit misclosures at the day boundaries by about 10 %, slightly improves the consistency of the estimated ERPs with those of the IERS 08 C04 Earth rotation series, and substantially reduces the systematics in the SLR validation of the GNSS orbits.

[1]  R. Dach,et al.  Contribution of Starlette, Stella, and AJISAI to the SLR-derived global reference frame , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[2]  H. Fliegel,et al.  Solar force modeling of block IIR Global Positioning System satellites , 1996 .

[3]  L. Mervart,et al.  Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. , 1994 .

[4]  J. Ray,et al.  Anomalous harmonics in the spectra of GPS position estimates , 2008 .

[5]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) , 2014 .

[6]  L. Mervart,et al.  Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 , 2007 .

[7]  Gerald L. Mader,et al.  GPS Antenna Calibration at the National Geodetic Survey , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[8]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Enhanced solar radiation pressure modeling for Galileo satellites , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[9]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  Subseasonal GNSS positioning errors , 2013 .

[10]  Paul Cross,et al.  Photon Pressure Modeling: The Key to High Precision GPS Satellite Orbits , 2002 .

[11]  Yoaz E. Bar-Sever,et al.  A new model for GPS yaw attitude , 1996 .

[12]  G. Beutler,et al.  A New Solar Radiation Pressure Model for GPS Satellites , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[13]  Paul Cross,et al.  Modeling Photon Pressure: The Key to High Precision Satellite Orbits , 2002 .

[14]  M. Meindl,et al.  GNSS processing at CODE: status report , 2009 .

[15]  Timon Anton Springer Modeling and validating orbits and clocks using the Global Positioning System , 2002 .

[16]  C. Bizouard,et al.  The Combined Solution C04 for Earth Orientation Parameters Consistent with International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2005 , 2009 .

[17]  Michael Meindl Combined Analysis of Observations from Different Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2011 .

[18]  H. Fliegel,et al.  Global Positioning System Radiation Force Model for geodetic applications , 1992 .

[19]  R. Dach,et al.  Geocenter coordinates estimated from GNSS data as viewed by perturbation theory , 2013 .

[20]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Reducing the draconitic errors in GNSS geodetic products , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[21]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Satellite laser ranging to GPS and GLONASS , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[22]  M. Ziebart Generalized Analytical Solar Radiation Pressure Modeling Algorithm for Spacecraft of Complex Shape , 2004 .

[23]  Y. Bar-Sever,et al.  New Empirically Derived Solar Radiation Pressure Model for Global Positioning System Satellites During Eclipse Seasons , 2005 .

[24]  Rodríguez Solano,et al.  Impact of non-conservative force modeling on GNSS satellite orbits and global solutions , 2014 .

[25]  Jim R. Ray,et al.  Sub-daily alias and draconitic errors in the IGS orbits , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[26]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[27]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Homogeneous reprocessing of GPS, GLONASS and SLR observations , 2014, Journal of Geodesy.

[28]  G. Beutler,et al.  Analysis of the first year of Earth rotation parameters with a sub-daily resolution gained at the CODE processing center of the IGS , 2000 .

[29]  U. Hugentobler,et al.  Impact of Earth radiation pressure on GPS position estimates , 2012, Journal of Geodesy.

[30]  Chris Rizos,et al.  The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of Global Navigation Satellite Systems , 2009 .