Differential Private POI Queries via Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform

The growing popularity of location-based services is giving untrusted servers relatively free reign to collect huge amounts of location information from mobile users. This information can reveal far more than just a user’s locations but other sensitive information, such as the user’s interests or daily routines, which raises strong privacy concerns. Differential privacy is a well-acknowledged privacy notion that has become an important standard for the preservation of privacy. Unfortunately, existing privacy preservation methods based on differential privacy protect user location privacy at the cost of utility, aspects of which have to be sacrificed to ensure that privacy is maintained. To solve this problem, we present a new privacy framework that includes a semi-trusted third party. Under our privacy framework, both the server and the third party only hold a part of the user’s location information. Neither the server nor the third party knows the exact location of the user. In addition, the proposed perturbation method based on the Johnson Lindenstrauss transform satisfies the differential privacy. Two popular point of interest queries, $k$ -NN and Range, are used to evaluate the method on two real-world data sets. Extensive comparisons against two representative differential privacy-based methods show that the proposed method not only provides a strict privacy guarantee but also significantly improves performance.

[1]  Qiong Huang,et al.  User-Defined Privacy Grid System for Continuous Location-Based Services , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[2]  Stavros Papadopoulos,et al.  Nearest neighbor search with strong location privacy , 2010, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[3]  Takahiro Hara,et al.  Dummy-Based User Location Anonymization Under Real-World Constraints , 2016, IEEE Access.

[4]  David Wetherall,et al.  Toward trustworthy mobile sensing , 2010, HotMobile '10.

[5]  Feng Xia,et al.  Heterogeneous incentive mechanism for time-sensitive and location-dependent crowdsensing networks with random arrivals , 2018, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Optimal Geo-Indistinguishable Mechanisms for Location Privacy , 2014, CCS.

[7]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[8]  Abhinav Palia,et al.  Optimizing noise level for perturbing geo-location data , 2017, ArXiv.

[9]  Tianqing Zhu,et al.  Silence is Golden: Enhancing Privacy of Location-Based Services by Content Broadcasting and Active Caching in Wireless Vehicular Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Anupam Gupta,et al.  An elementary proof of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma , 1999 .

[11]  Dimitris Achlioptas,et al.  Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins , 2003, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[12]  Rinku Dewri,et al.  Private Retrieval of POI Details in Top-K Queries , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Geo-indistinguishability: differential privacy for location-based systems , 2012, CCS.

[14]  Qiang Ni,et al.  A K-Anonymity Based Schema for Location Privacy Preservation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing.

[15]  Cyrus Shahabi,et al.  Blind Evaluation of Nearest Neighbor Queries Using Space Transformation to Preserve Location Privacy , 2007, SSTD.

[16]  Rinku Dewri,et al.  Local Differential Perturbations: Location Privacy under Approximate Knowledge Attackers , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  W. B. Johnson,et al.  Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into Hilbert space , 1984 .

[18]  Catuscia Palamidessi,et al.  Geo-indistinguishability: A Principled Approach to Location Privacy , 2015, ICDCIT.

[19]  Shui Yu,et al.  Big data set privacy preserving through sensitive attribute-based grouping , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[20]  Li Xiong,et al.  Protecting Locations with Differential Privacy under Temporal Correlations , 2014, CCS.

[21]  Panos Kalnis,et al.  Location Diversity: Enhanced Privacy Protection in Location Based Services , 2009, LoCA.

[22]  Avrim Blum,et al.  The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform Itself Preserves Differential Privacy , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[23]  Andreas Gutscher Coordinate transformation - a solution for the privacy problem of location based services? , 2006, Proceedings 20th IEEE International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium.

[24]  Fenghua Li,et al.  Time obfuscation-based privacy-preserving scheme for Location-Based Services , 2016, 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[25]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  Practical Approximate k Nearest Neighbor Queries with Location and Query Privacy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.