Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior

Abstract Plagiarism has received considerable attention over the past two decades. Exploring the predictors of this type of academic misconduct can support stakeholders when confronting and managing the incidents of plagiarism. Using an extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) framework, this study aims to understand the antecedents of plagiarism. In the study, the influence of new variables such as moral obligation and past behavior were tested along with more familiar TPB constructs. Moreover, the variable of perceived behavioral control was substituted with the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) literacy variable, which is measured using Internet, computer and information literacy. Adopting a cross-sectional survey design, the data were collected from 588 university students and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results demonstrated that attitude, information literacy, moral obligation and past behavior were significant predictors of behavior intention to engage in plagiarism, whilst subjective norms, Internet literacy and computer literacy were not. The study concluded that the most appropriate way to combat plagiarism is through pedagogy. Offering more courses to university students on the subjects of ethics, morality and literacy is therefore highly recommended.

[1]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[2]  Irvin R. Katz.  Beyond Technical Competence: Literacy in Information and Communication Technology , 2005 .

[3]  Katherine S. Dabbour,et al.  Predicting Students’ Intention to Plagiarize: an Ethical Theoretical Framework , 2017 .

[4]  Donald D. Carpenter,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates , 2007 .

[5]  Steven M. Hubbard,et al.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Validate the Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model for Predicting Student Cheating , 2009 .

[6]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[7]  Samuel V. Bruton,et al.  The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin® , 2016 .

[8]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal‐directed behaviours , 1995 .

[9]  Nancy B. Kurland.  Ethical Intentions and the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior1 , 1995 .

[10]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[11]  Aaron U. Bolin.  Self-Control, Perceived Opportunity, and Attitudes as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty , 2004, The Journal of psychology.

[12]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  The Pressures of Assessment in Undergraduate Courses and their Effect on Student Behaviours , 2001 .

[13]  Yavuz Akbulut,et al.  Predictors of digital piracy among Turkish undergraduate students , 2018, Telematics Informatics.

[14]  Are We on the Same Page? College Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Student Plagiarism in Taiwan , 2017 .

[15]  S. Moss,et al.  A Systematic Review Into the Psychological Causes and Correlates of Plagiarism , 2018 .

[16]  Ömer Uysal,et al.  Influence of gender, program of study and PC experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating , 2007 .

[18]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[19]  M. Perc,et al.  Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students , 2018, PloS one.

[20]  I. Ajzen.  Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[22]  A. Jordan,et al.  College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy , 2001 .

[23]  Ja Mee Kim,et al.  IE Behavior Intent: A Study on ICT Ethics of College Students in Korea , 2014 .

[24]  E. Jereb,et al.  Gender differences and the awareness of plagiarism in higher education , 2018 .

[25]  Yavuz Akbulut,et al.  Exploration of the antecedents of digital piracy through a structural equation model , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[26]  L. Roberts,et al.  Predicting self-reported research misconduct and questionable research practices in university students using an augmented Theory of Planned Behavior , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[27]  Mark Conner,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour: Assessment of predictive validity and 'perceived control , 1999 .

[28]  Lyle F. Schoenfeldt,et al.  Toward a classification of persons. , 1979 .

[29]  John Trushell,et al.  ICT facilitated access to information and undergraduates' cheating behaviours , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[31]  J. Stephens.  Bridging the Divide: The Role of Motivation and Self-Regulation in Explaining the Judgment-Action Gap Related to Academic Dishonesty , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Gordana Brumini,et al.  Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. , 2010, Croatian medical journal.

[33]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  ‘Not necessarily a bad thing …’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students , 2008 .

[34]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension to Modified Honor Code Settings , 2002 .

[35]  Hatice Ferhan Odabasi,et al.  Unethical computer using behavior scale: A study of reliability and validity on Turkish university students , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[36]  Wilfred W. F. Lau,et al.  Developing and validating of a perceived ICT literacy scale for junior secondary school students: Pedagogical and educational contributions , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Maher M. Abu-Hilal,et al.  The psychometric properties of an information-ethics questionnaire , 2017 .

[38]  B. Whitley,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review , 1998 .

[39]  I. Ajzen,et al.  A Comparison of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Theory of Reasoned Action , 1992 .

[40]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[41]  Shelley Yeo,et al.  First‐year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism , 2007 .

[42]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[43]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  Guofang Wan,et al.  Digital Cheating and Plagiarism in Schools , 2008 .

[45]  J. Elen,et al.  Support in Learning Environments: Touching the Limits of Instructional Design , 2005 .

[46]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[47]  Allan H. K. Yuen,et al.  Understanding adolescents' unethical online behaviors: a structural equation approach , 2015 .

[48]  Rebecca Moore Howard,et al.  Plagiarism in the Internet Age. , 2009 .

[49]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Modification of Fishbein and Ajzen's theory of reasoned action to predict chip consumption , 1991 .

[50]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation , 1997 .

[51]  T. P. Cronan,et al.  Factors that Influence the Intention to Pirate Software and Media , 2008 .

[52]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[53]  P. Bentler,et al.  Attitudes "cause" behaviors: A structural equation analysis. , 1981 .

[54]  David E. Douglas,et al.  Further Understanding Factors that Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework , 2017 .

[55]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[56]  J. Ehrich,et al.  Canadian university students’ gendered attitudes toward plagiarism , 2017 .

[57]  Angela M. Weiler.  Information-seeking behavior in Generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory , 2005 .

[58]  I. M. Jawahar,et al.  Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality , 2010 .

[59]  I. Ajzen.  Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives , 2002 .

[60]  Selcan Kilis,et al.  Perceived Effectiveness of Turnitin® in Detecting Plagiarism in Presentation Slides , 2019, Contemporary Educational Technology.

[61]  Wilfred W. F. Lau,et al.  Internet ethics of adolescents: Understanding demographic differences , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[62]  Lucia Vardanega,et al.  Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement , 2016 .

[63]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[64]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2015, MIS Q..

[65]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[66]  J. Ehrich,et al.  A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism , 2016 .

[67]  Ina Blau,et al.  The ethical dissonance in digital and non-digital learning environments: Does technology promotes cheating among middle school students? , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[68]  Eloise Coupey,et al.  Belief, Affect, and Attitude: Alternative Models of the Determinants of Attitude , 2000 .

[69]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[70]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[71]  S. Biddle,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Review of the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior in Physical Activity: Predictive Validity and the Contribution of Additional Variables , 2002 .

[72]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[73]  J. Landau,et al.  Keeping up with the Joneses: Students' Perceptions of Academically Dishonest Behavior , 2008 .

[74]  Donald D. Carpenter,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ DECISIONS TO CHEAT BY TYPE OF ASSESSMENT , 2006 .

[75]  Insung Jung,et al.  Ethical judgments and behaviors: Applying a multidimensional ethics scale to measuring ICT ethics of college students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[76]  Yavuz Akbulut,et al.  Exploring the types and reasons of Internet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS) , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[77]  Ranald Macdonald,et al.  Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach , 2006 .

[78]  Jennifer L. Kisamore,et al.  Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct , 2009 .

[79]  Ahmet Ok,et al.  Internet plagiarism in higher education: tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates , 2014 .

[80]  Kitae Kim,et al.  A normative approach to reducing illegal music downloading: The persuasive effects of normative message framing , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[81]  R. Howard,et al.  Plagiarism and the Internet: Fears, Facts, and Pedagogies , 2016 .

[82]  Gail M. Sullivan,et al.  Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough. , 2012, Journal of graduate medical education.

[83]  M. Hosny,et al.  Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study , 2014 .

[84]  Omer Hassan Ali Mahfoodh,et al.  Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: a Review of Studies , 2017 .