Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries.

PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of electrocardiography (ECG)-gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in enabling the detection of obstruction of both bypass grafts and coronary arteries in symptomatic patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS ECG-gated contrast material-enhanced multi-detector row CT angiography was performed in 24 patients after bypass surgery. Two independent blinded observers evaluated all graft and coronary segments (> or =2.0-mm diameter) for occlusion and stenosis (50%-99% luminal reduction). Conventional angiography was regarded as the standard of reference. Descriptive parameters were calculated, and the results for arterial grafts, venous grafts, and coronary arteries, as well as for high and low heart rates, were compared by using a two-sided Fisher exact test. RESULTS The following results were obtained by observers 1 and 2, respectively: Of the 60 venous graft segments, 60 (100%) and 57 (95.0%) were assessable, with an overall detection of all 17 occlusions (both observers) and three (50.0%) and five (83.3%) of six stenoses. Of 26 arterial graft segments, 19 (73.1%) and 15 (57.7%) were assessable. In the assessable segments, four of four (100%) and two of three (66.7%) stenoses and occlusions were detected, while one and two obstructions were located in nonassessable segments. Of 211 coronary segments, 146 (69.2%) and 140 (66.4%) were assessable, and detection of 50%-100% obstruction yielded a sensitivity of 89.9% (71 of 79) and 79.4% (54 of 68) and a specificity of 74.6% (50 of 67) and 72.2% (52 of 72) for each observer. Unlike the assessment of venous and arterial grafts, assessment of the coronary arteries with multi-detector row CT was significantly better in patients with low heart rates (P <.01). CONCLUSION Multi-detector row CT allows noninvasive angiographic evaluation of both coronary arteries and bypass grafts in patients who have undergone bypass surgery. Multi-detector row CT is more effective in examining venous grafts compared with arterial grafts and diffusely diseased coronary arteries.

[1]  Y. Tsutsumi,et al.  Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computed tomography , 1999, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  Y. Jang,et al.  Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency using three-dimensional angiography obtained with contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M. Reiser,et al.  Accuracy of spiral computed tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  P. Costello,et al.  Spiral CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  D. Berman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. , 1987, Circulation.

[6]  V. Mühlberger,et al.  Predictive value of computed tomographic determination of the patency rate of aortocoronary venous bypasses in relation to angiographic results. , 1990, European heart journal.

[7]  K. Engelmann,et al.  Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  W. Rogers,et al.  Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  M. Budoff,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency and flow characteristics by electron-beam tomography. , 2002, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[11]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[13]  C. White,et al.  Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  W J Keon,et al.  Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  R. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary bypass graft patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  D. Berman,et al.  Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2001, Circulation.