Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets

Modern computerization facilitates data-gathering from forest machines, and offers new opportunities to develop models for predicting productivity in forest harvest operations. In this study, we analyze the productivity of cut-to-length harvesting and forwarding in thinning and final felling using a routinely recorded follow-up dataset. The data originate from over 700 machines that, over a 3-year period, harvested and forwarded more than 20 million m3 of round-wood from upwards of 20 thousand stands, making the dataset larger than any that has previously been used for productivity modelling. Results comprise a range of stand-based productivity models of varying complexity for both harvesters and forwarders. Mean stem size was the most influential variable for harvesting productivity: modelling based on mean stem size explained 57.6% of the variance in thinnings and 55.3% in final fellings. However, accurate predictions of forwarding productivity required the simultaneous consideration of several variables. For instance, modelling of forwarder productivity based on the variables mean stem size, mean extraction distance and forwarder load capacity explained 26.4% of the variance in thinnings and 35.2% in final fellings. Results should be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in the study and modelling of forest operations.

[1]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Methods, Standards and Work Design , 1998 .

[2]  Jori Uusitalo,et al.  Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system , 2006 .

[3]  Rien Visser,et al.  Determining the shape of the productivity function for mechanized felling and felling-processing , 2012, Journal of Forest Research.

[4]  Rolf Björheden,et al.  Basic Time Concepts For International Comparisons of Time Study Reports , 1991 .

[5]  Yuri Gerasimov,et al.  Productivity of single-grip harvesters in clear-cutting operations in the northern European part of Russia , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[6]  W. Zeng,et al.  Bias Correction in Logarithmic Regression and Comparison with Weighted Regression for Nonlinear Models , 2011 .

[7]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Effects of the number of assortments and log concentration on time consumption for forwarding , 2013 .

[8]  Metsäteho Oy,et al.  Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning Harvesters , 2004 .

[9]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Forces Required to Vertically Uproot Tree Stumps , 2010 .

[10]  Matti Sirén,et al.  Productivity and Costs of Thinning Harvesters and Harvester-Forwarders , 2003 .

[11]  E. Mayo The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization , 1934, Nature.

[12]  Jörn Erler,et al.  The Human Influence on Productivity in Harvester Operations , 2011 .

[13]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Productivity standards for harvesters and processors in Italy. , 2010 .

[14]  Mauricio Acuna,et al.  Estimating harvester productivity in Pinus radiata plantations using StanForD stem files , 2013 .

[15]  Kalle Kärhä,et al.  Productivity and Cutting Costs of Thinning Harvesters , 2004 .

[16]  L. C. Pigage,et al.  Motion and time study , 1954 .

[17]  G. Baskerville Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass , 1972 .

[18]  Kari Väätäinen,et al.  Automatic Time Study Method for Recording Work Phase Times of Timber Harvesting , 2013 .

[19]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Changes in technical performance, mechanical availability and prices of machines used in forest operations in Sweden from 1985 to 2010 , 2010 .

[20]  Patrick Hiesl,et al.  Applicability of International Harvesting Equipment Productivity Studies in Maine, USA: A Literature Review , 2013 .

[21]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Productivity of a Prototype Truck- Mounted Logging Residue Bundler and a Road-side Bundling System , 2010 .

[22]  B. L. Lanford,et al.  Utilization and Cost of Log Production from Animal Logging Operations , 2005 .

[23]  Ola Lindroos,et al.  The correlation between long-term productivity and short-term performance ratings of harvester operators , 2011 .

[24]  B. Niebel Motion and Time Study , 1976 .

[25]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Productivity of grapple skidders in southern pine , 1988 .

[26]  Hans Rudolf Heinimann,et al.  Productivity of a cut-to-length harvester family - an analysis based on operation data , 2001 .

[27]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Utilization Rates and Cost Factors in Timber Harvesting Based on Long-term Machine Data , 2011 .