Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education

Social Media tools are seen by many authors as powerful drivers of change for teaching and learning practices, in terms of openness, interactivity and sociability. However, extensive surveys about actual use that are carried out with large samples at a national level are rare. This study reports the results of a survey addressed to the Italian academic staff, with the aim of identifying the uses of Social Media in the field of university teaching practices. The response rate was 10.5%, corresponding to 6139. The respondents were asked to identify frequency of use, motivations, teaching practices and obstacles related to the use of a number of tools: generic social network sites (Twitter, Facebook), professional and academic networking services (LinkedIn, ResearchGate and Academia.edu), tools to write and comment (blogs, wikis) and to archive and retrieve content material for lectures and group work (podcasts, YouTube and Vimeo, SlideShare). Analyses of data tested which socio-demographic variables mostly affected frequency of use, and the relationships between motivations, ways of use, barriers to use and the scientific discipline. The results show that Social Media use is still rather limited and restricted and that academics are not much inclined to integrate these devices into their practices for several reasons, such as cultural resistance, pedagogical issues or institutional constraints. However, there are differences among academics in the ways they use Social Media or perceive them, mostly depending on the scientific discipline of teaching. Overall, the results emphasise ambivalent attitudes towards the benefits and challenges of Social Media in the context of higher education with obstacles prevailing over advantages. We examine the frequency of use of Social Media for teaching purposes.The variable most associated with frequency of use is scientific discipline.We present motivations and ways to use Social Media tools in teaching.A principal component analysis reveals three main factors as obstacles to use.Results show a complex scenario where potentials and barriers are intertwined.

[1]  D. Boyd,et al.  Sociality Through Social Network Sites , 2013 .

[2]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: A collective case study , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Carlos Rodríguez-Hoyos,et al.  Research on SNS and Education: The State of the Art and Its Challenges. , 2015 .

[4]  N. Selwyn.  Social media in higher education , 2011 .

[5]  Samuel Garrett-Jones,et al.  How Demographic Characteristics Affect Mode Preference in a Postal/Web Mixed-Mode Survey of Australian Researchers , 2007 .

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[7]  M. Ranieri,et al.  "Yes for sharing, no for teaching!": Social Media in academic practices , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[9]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011 , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  M. Monroe,et al.  Increasing Response Rates to Web-Based Surveys , 2012, Journal of Extension.

[11]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[12]  J. Seaman,et al.  Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today's Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media. , 2011 .

[13]  R. Mason,et al.  E-Learning and Social Networking Handbook , 2008 .

[14]  Timothy Teo.  Online and paper-based survey data: Are they equivalent? , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Stefania Manca,et al.  Implications of social network sites for teaching and learning. Where we are and where we want to go , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[16]  G. Kirkup.  Academic blogging: academic practice and academic identity , 2010 .

[17]  R. Hartshorne,et al.  Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Charles Crook,et al.  The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting , 2012 .

[19]  M. Rogers-Estable,et al.  Web 2.0 Use in Higher Education , 2014 .

[20]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[21]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[23]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[24]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[25]  G. Veletsianos,et al.  Scholars and faculty members' lived experiences in online social networks , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.  Social software, Web 2.0 and learning: status and implications of an evolving paradigm , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[28]  Samantha Cooke,et al.  Social teaching: Student perspectives on the inclusion of social media in higher education , 2015, Education and Information Technologies.

[29]  Susan A. Brown.  Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  George Siemens,et al.  Higher Education and the Promises and Perils of Social Networks , 2015, RUSC, Universities and Knowledge Society Journal.

[31]  Evelyn Frances Lewis.  Teaching crowds: Learning and social media , 2015 .

[32]  Reynol Junco,et al.  Engaging Students through Social Media: Evidence-Based Practices for Use in Student Affairs , 2014 .

[33]  Karen M. Scott,et al.  Does a university teacher need to change e-learning beliefs and practices when using a social networking site? A longitudinal case study , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[34]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption , 2013, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[35]  Paul A. Tess.  The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) - A literature review , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Sotiris Bersimis,et al.  Evaluating Web 2.0 technologies in higher education using students' perceptions and performance , 2014, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[37]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: expectations, frustrations, appropriation, and compartmentalization , 2013 .

[38]  Francis T. McAndrew,et al.  Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[39]  Meagan Karvonen,et al.  Faculty instructional attitudes, interest, and intention: Predictors of Web 2.0 use in online courses , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[40]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? , 2008 .

[41]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[42]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  Stefania Manca,et al.  Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[44]  Paul Hong,et al.  Using social media applications for educational outcomes in college teaching: A structural equation analysis , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[45]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .