Assessing urban vulnerability and social adaptation to risk: Evidence from Santo Domingo

Urban areas are becoming increasingly risky places to live, especially for low-income residents of cities in developing countries. Exposure to environmental risk and hazard has stimulated a range of work examining the physical processes creating these hazards, and the human processes that lead to vulnerability. Both approaches are useful, but are in danger of focusing on proximate rather than underlying causes. The concept of 'adaptive potential' is introduced in this paper to expose the social base of vulnerability. It offers a framework for broadening the analysis of risk to include an examination of local social assets. Such assets may already be used in confronting vulnerability, or they may be more latent; in either case, they offer a way for strategic policy interventions to enhance community resilience with regard to future risk at a time of growing environmental uncertainty. Adaptive potential is applied to a case study community in Santo Domingo.

[1]  Environmental Problems in Sao Paulo: The Challenge for Co‐Responsibility and Innovative Crisis Management , 1997 .

[2]  M. Pelling.  Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana , 1998 .

[3]  M. Lipton.  Reviving global poverty reduction : what role for genetically modified plants ? , 2000 .

[4]  Caroline Moser,et al.  The Asset Vulnerability Framework: Reassessing Urban Poverty Reduction Strategies''World Development , 1998 .

[5]  Ellen Wratten,et al.  Conceptualizing urban poverty , 1995 .

[6]  C. Moser,et al.  Violence and social capital in urban poor communities: perspectives from Colombia and Guatemala , 2001 .

[7]  M. Pelling.  The political ecology of flood hazard in urban Guyana , 1999 .

[8]  J. Putzel,et al.  POLICY ARENA: Accounting for the 'dark side' of social capital: reading Robert Putnam on democracy , 1997 .

[9]  Jerry T. Mitchell,et al.  Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina , 2000 .

[10]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[11]  G. Hyden.  Civil society, social capital, and development: Dissection of a complex discourse , 1997 .

[12]  The need for new approaches to disaster management; the floods in Lusaka, Zambia , 1993 .

[13]  Cities, disasters and livelihoods , 2000 .

[14]  P. Berke,et al.  Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. , 1993, Disasters.

[15]  M. Qizilbash.  A weakness of the capability approach with respect to gender justice , 1997 .

[16]  W. Adger.  Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam , 1999 .

[17]  C. Moser.  Confronting crisis : a summary of household responses to poverty and vulnerability in four, poor urban communities , 1996 .

[18]  F. Fukuyama.  Social capital, civil society and development , 2001 .

[19]  Virginia Jimenez Diaz.  Landslides in the squatter settlements of Caracas; towards a better understanding of causative factors , 1992 .

[20]  Mark Pelling,et al.  What determines vulnerability to floods; a case study in Georgetown, Guyana , 1997 .

[21]  D. Hulme,et al.  NGO performance and accountability in the post‐cold war world , 1995 .

[22]  B. Wisner.  Marginality and vulnerability , 1998 .

[23]  P. Evans.  Introduction: Development strategies across the public-private divide , 1996 .

[24]  N Lewer,et al.  Social capital and the political economy of violence: a case study of Sri Lanka. , 2000, Disasters.