Exploring the Odds: Gender Differences in Departing the Engineering Profession

Women’s departure or nonentrance into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics professions, particularly engineering, has been a lively source of scholarly inquiry for the past three decades. Much of the literature in this area has been with solely female samples of participants, begging the question as to whether or not men and women either choose to leave the profession or not enter for the same or similar reasons. This present study collected a large sample of men (n = 1,273) who had either left or never entered the engineering profession and compared their responses to a large sample of women (n = 1,235) on a set of categorical response variables. Using the perspective of the Theory of Work Adjustment, our results suggest that there are gender differences in reasons for departure, raising the possibility that engineering climates differentially reinforce needs for men and women. Implications of this research are discussed.

[1]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Lean in Messages Increase Attributions of Women’s Responsibility for Gender Inequality , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Emily T. Amanatullah,et al.  Who Can Lean In? The Intersecting Role of Race and Gender in Negotiations , 2018, Psychology of Women Quarterly.

[3]  N. Fouad,et al.  Why do women engineers leave the engineering profession? The roles of work–family conflict, occupational commitment, and perceived organizational support , 2018 .

[4]  P. Hill,et al.  Career Paths in Engineering Firms , 2018 .

[5]  N. Fouad,et al.  Women’s Reasons for Leaving the Engineering Field , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[6]  N. Fouad,et al.  Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering , 2016 .

[7]  Heather Z. Lyons,et al.  Tests of the theory of work adjustment with economically distressed African Americans. , 2014, Journal of counseling psychology.

[8]  R. Singh,et al.  Stemming the tide: Predicting women engineers' intentions to leave ☆ , 2013 .

[9]  Diana Bilimoria,et al.  Why they stay: women persisting in US engineering careers , 2013 .

[10]  Cheri Ostroff Person-Environment Fit in Organizational Settings , 2012 .

[11]  Michael A. Flynn,et al.  Applying the Theory of Work Adjustment to Latino Immigrant Workers , 2012, Journal of career development.

[12]  P. Creed,et al.  The Physician Values in Practice Scale-Short Form: Development and Initial Validation , 2011 .

[13]  Gary Lichtenstein,et al.  An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate Engineering Majors , 2009 .

[14]  Thomas W. H. Ng,et al.  Careers: Mobility, Embeddedness, and Success , 2007 .

[15]  J. Blickenstaff Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .

[16]  Jacob Clark Blickenstaff*,et al.  Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .

[17]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[18]  Beryl Hesketh,et al.  Work Adjustment Theory: An empirical test using a fuzzy rating scale☆ , 1992 .

[19]  C. Juntunen,et al.  Theories of vocational psychology. , 2012 .