The Persistence of Distraction: The Hidden Costs of Intermittent Multitasking

We examined the hidden costs of intermittent multitasking. Participants performed a pursuit-tracking task (Experiment 1) or drove in a high-fidelity driving simulator (Experiment 2) by itself or while concurrently performing an easy or difficult backwards counting task that periodically started and stopped, creating ontask and off-task multitasking epochs. A novel application of the Detection Response Task (DRT), a standardized protocol for measuring cognitive workload (ISO 17488, 2016), was used to measure performance in the on-task and off-task intervals. We found striking costs that persisted well after the counting task had stopped. In fact, the multitasking costs dissipated as a negatively accelerated function of time with the largest costs observed immediately after multitasking ceased. Performance in the off-task interval remained above baseline levels throughout the 30-s off-task interval. We suggest that loading new procedures into working memory occurs fairly quickly, whereas purging this information from working memory takes considerably longer.

[1]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual coupling between pupillary, electrophysiological, and behavioral responses in a visual oddball task. , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Brennan R. Payne,et al.  The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: A simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study , 2020, Cortex.

[3]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  How is multi-tasking different from increased difficulty? , 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[4]  Philippe Vincent-Lamarre,et al.  A Replication of Waugh and Norman (1965) Primary Memory study , 2020 .

[5]  J. Gold,et al.  Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Andrew Heathcote,et al.  Using response time modeling to understand the sources of dual-task interference in a dynamic environment. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Joel M. Cooper,et al.  Assessing the visual and cognitive demands of in-vehicle information systems , 2019, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[8]  Spencer C. Castro,et al.  Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  Cognitive Structure, Flexibility, and Plasticity in Human Multitasking—An Integrative Review of Dual-Task and Task-Switching Research , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[11]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Dynamic Workload Fluctuations in Driver/Non-Driver Conversational DYADS , 2017 .

[12]  Anita Gärling,et al.  Do redundant head-up and head-down display configurations cause distractions? , 2017 .

[13]  D. Strayer,et al.  Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver , 2017, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[14]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Talking to your car can drive you to distraction , 2016, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

[15]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Extending the Detection Response Task to Simultaneously Measure Cognitive and Visual Task Demands , 2016 .

[16]  Donald L. Fisher,et al.  SPIDER: A Framework for Understanding Driver Distraction , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[17]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[18]  David L Strayer,et al.  The Smartphone and the Driver’s Cognitive Workload: A Comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft’s Intelligent Personal Assistants , 2015, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[19]  M. Endsley Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings , 2015 .

[20]  Ying Wang,et al.  The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[21]  Joel M. Cooper,et al.  Hierarchical control and driving. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[23]  David L. Strayer,et al.  The Impact of Eye Movements and Cognitive Workload on Lateral Position Variability in Driving , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[24]  D. Strayer,et al.  Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  Charlene Hallett,et al.  Driver distraction and driver inattention: definition, relationship and taxonomy. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  D. Strayer,et al.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[28]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple Resources and Mental Workload , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Comprehension and Situation Awareness , 2008 .

[31]  Claudia J. Stanny,et al.  Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving , 2007 .

[32]  William J Horrey,et al.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[33]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Concurrent Cognitive Task Modulates Coordination Dynamics , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[35]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[36]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[37]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[38]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  H. Pashler,et al.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Strategies and automaticity: II. Dynamic aspects of strategy adjustment. , 1994 .

[41]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  D. Navon,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[43]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[45]  S W Keele,et al.  Decay of Visual Information from a Single Letter , 1967, Science.

[46]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[47]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[48]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  A GROWING PROBLEM OF DRIVER DISTRACTION , 2011 .

[49]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Impact of Cognitive Task Complexity on Drivers’ Visual Tunneling , 2009 .

[50]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[51]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[52]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Task switching and multitask performance. , 2000 .

[53]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[54]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[55]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[56]  R. Engle Science Current Directions in Psychological Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[57]  D. Strayer,et al.  Provided for Non-commercial Research and Educational Use Only. Not for Reproduction, Distribution or Commercial Use. Cognitive Distraction While Multitasking in the Automobile , 2022 .

[58]  American Psychological Association, Inc. Processing Stages in Overlapping Tasks: Evidence for a Central Bottleneck , 2022 .