Dynamic backhaul sensitive Network Selection Scheme in LTE-WiFi wireless HetNet

Small-cell deployment within a wireless Heterogeneous Network (HetNet) presents backhauling challenges that differ from those of conventional macro-cells. Due to the lack of availability of fixed-lined backhaul at desired locations and due to cost saving reasons, operators may deploy a variety of backhaul technologies in a given network, combining available technologies such as fiber, xDSL, wireless backhaul and multi-hop mesh networks to backhaul small-cells. As a consequence, small-cells capacity may be non-uniform in the HetNet. Furthermore, some small-cells backhaul capacity may fluctuate if wireless backhaul is chosen. With such concerns in mind, a new network selection strategy considering small-cell backhaul capacity is proposed to ensure that users enjoy the best possible user experience especially in terms of connection throughput and fairness. The study compares performance of several common Network Selection Schemes (NSSs) such as WiFi First (WF) and Physical Data Rate (PDR) with the proposed Dynamic Backhaul Capacity Sensitive (DyBaCS) NSS in LTE-WiFi HetNets. The downlink performance of HetNet is evaluated in terms of average throughput per user and fairness among users. The effects of varying WiFi backhaul capacity form the focus for the evaluation. Results show that the DyBaCS scheme generally provides superior performance in terms of fairness and average throughput per user across the range of backhaul capacities considered.

[1]  Zheng Zhou,et al.  A seamless handoff in IEEE 802.16a and IEEE 802.11n hybrid networks , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems, 2005..

[2]  Junde Song,et al.  A Novel Network Selection Algorithm in Next Generation Heterogeneous Network for Modern Service Industry , 2008, 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference.

[3]  R. Jain Throughput fairness index : An explanation , 1999 .

[4]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Connectivity Analysis of Clustered Ad Hoc and Mesh Networks , 2007, IEEE GLOBECOM 2007 - IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[5]  V. Vaidehi,et al.  Always Best-Connected QoS integration model for the WLAN, WiMAX Heterogeneous Network , 2006, First International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems.

[6]  Peng Gong,et al.  Power allocation with max-min fairness for multicast in heterogeneous network , 2012, 2012 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[7]  John A. Silvester,et al.  A 3W network strategy for mobile data traffic offloading , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Matthew S. Grob,et al.  CDMA/HDR: a bandwidth-efficient high-speed wireless data service for nomadic users , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[9]  Fazal Wahab Karam,et al.  Performance Analysis of Ranking for QoS Handover Algorithm for Selection of Access Network in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks , 2012, 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN).

[10]  Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced , 2008 .

[11]  Ivan Andonovic,et al.  Optimization of heterogeneous multi-radio multi-hop rural wireless network , 2012, 2012 IEEE 14th International Conference on Communication Technology.

[12]  Peng Gong,et al.  Radio Resource Management with Proportional Rate Constraint in the Heterogeneous Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.