Spatiotemporal brain mapping during preparation, perception, and action

Deciding whether to act or not to act is a fundamental cognitive function. To avoid incorrect responses, both reactive and proactive modes of control have been postulated. Little is known, however, regarding the brain implementation of proactive mechanisms, which are deployed prior to an actual need to inhibit a response. Via a combination of electrophysiological and neuroimaging measures (recorded in 21 and 16 participants, respectively), we describe the brain localization and timing of neural activity that underlies the anticipatory proactive mechanism. From these results, we conclude that proactive control originates in the inferior Frontal gyrus, is established well before stimulus perception, and is released concomitantly with stimulus appearance. Stimulus perception triggers early activity in the anterior insula and intraparietal cortex contralateral to the responding hand; these areas likely mediate the transition from perception to action. The neural activities leading to the decision to act or not to act are described in the framework of a three-stage model that includes perception, action, and anticipatory functions taking place well before stimulus onset.

[1]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  M. Criaud,et al.  Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  M. Berchicci,et al.  From cognitive motor preparation to visual processing: The benefits of childhood fitness to brain health , 2015, Neuroscience.

[4]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  EEG–fMRI Combination for the Study of Visual Perception and Spatial Attention , 2014 .

[5]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  A Passive Exoskeleton Can Push Your Life Up: Application on Multiple Sclerosis Patients , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Decision and action planning signals in human posterior parietal cortex during delayed perceptual choices , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  Parallel motion signals to the medial and lateral motion areas V6 and MT+ , 2013, NeuroImage.

[12]  René J. Huster,et al.  Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  To See or Not to See: Prestimulus α Phase Predicts Visual Awareness , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Sharp,et al.  Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  G Gratton,et al.  Comparison of neuronal and hemodynamic measures of the brain response to visual stimulation: An optical imaging study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[16]  S. Everling,et al.  Event-related potentials associated with correct and incorrect responses in a cued antisaccade task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  An Oculomotor Decision Process Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Interpreting event-related brain potential (ERP) distributions: Implications of baseline potentials and variability with application to amplitude normalization by vector scaling , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[19]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Benefits of sports participation for executive function in disabled athletes. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[21]  Michael M. Plichta,et al.  Sequential inhibitory control processes assessed through simultaneous EEG–fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Prestimulus Cortical Activity is Correlated with Speed of Visuomotor Processing , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  L. Deecke,et al.  High resolution spatiotemporal analysis of the contingent negative variation in simple or complex motor tasks and a non-motor task , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[25]  Katiuscia Sacco,et al.  Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[26]  D B Lindsley,et al.  Synthesis of the contingent negative variation brain potential from noncontingent stimulus and motor elements. , 1980, Science.

[27]  R. Bogacz,et al.  The neural basis of the speed–accuracy tradeoff , 2010, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  R Verleger,et al.  The waltzing oddball. , 1991, Psychophysiology.

[29]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  The neurophysiology of central and peripheral fatigue during sub-maximal lower limb isometric contractions , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  Iain D. Gilchrist,et al.  The contribution of pre-stimulus neural oscillatory activity to spontaneous response time variability , 2015, NeuroImage.

[31]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  The premotor role of the prefrontal cortex in response consistency. , 2015, Neuropsychology.

[32]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Prefrontal hyperactivity in older people during motor planning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[35]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Valuation and decision-making in frontal cortex: one or many serial or parallel systems? , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  S. Ben Hamed,et al.  Proactive Inhibitory Control of Response as the Default State of Executive Control , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Honda,et al.  Dissociation between contingent negative variation (CNV) and Bereitschaftspotential (BP) in patients with parkinsonism. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Mangun Cognitive Electrophysiology of Attention: Signals of the Mind , 2013 .

[41]  D. Pizzagalli,et al.  When ‘go’ and ‘nogo’ are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[42]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  A. Turken,et al.  Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[44]  J Leon Kenemans,et al.  Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Anterior insula activations in perceptual paradigms: often observed but barely understood , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[47]  J T Mordkoff,et al.  Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[48]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Sport is not always healthy: Executive brain dysfunction in professional boxers. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[49]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[50]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in NO-GO performances—an event-related fMRI study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[51]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Individual differences in response speed and accuracy are associated to specific brain activities of two interacting systems , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[52]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[54]  R. VanRullen,et al.  The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception , 2010 .

[55]  R. VanRullen,et al.  This Is the Rhythm of Your Eyes: The Phase of Ongoing Electroencephalogram Oscillations Modulates Saccadic Reaction Time , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  S. Makeig,et al.  Mining event-related brain dynamics , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[58]  C. M Gómez,et al.  Preparatory visuo-motor cortical network of the contingent negative variation estimated by current density , 2003, NeuroImage.

[59]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[60]  Marika Berchicci,et al.  Benefits of Physical Exercise on the Aging Brain: The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[61]  René J. Huster,et al.  Proactive and reactive sequential effects on selective attention , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[62]  P. Krappmann,et al.  Influence of pre-target cortical potentials on saccadic reaction times , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Why do we make mistakes? Neurocognitive processes during the preparation–perception–action cycle and error-detection , 2015, NeuroImage.

[64]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  Sabrina Pitzalis,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Brain Mapping of Motion-Onset VEPs Combined with fMRI and Retinotopic Maps , 2012, PloS one.

[66]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[67]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[69]  M. Brass,et al.  To Do or Not to Do: The Neural Signature of Self-Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[71]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[72]  Juliana Yordanova,et al.  On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3 , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[73]  M. M. C. Berg-Lenssen,et al.  A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity (spn) prior to feedback stimuli , 2005, Brain Topography.

[74]  K. Böcker,et al.  Cortical Measures of Anticipation , 2004 .

[75]  J. Velay,et al.  Cueing method biases in visual detection studies , 2007, Brain Research.

[76]  M. Bianciardi,et al.  Single-epoch analysis of interleaved evoked potentials and fMRI responses during steady-state visual stimulation , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[77]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Sensory-motor mechanisms in human parietal cortex underlie arbitrary visual decisions , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[79]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Benefits of Physical Exercise on Basic Visuo-Motor Functions Across Age , 2014, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[81]  S. Kelly,et al.  Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[82]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[83]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Cortical Dynamics during the Preparation of Antisaccadic and Prosaccadic Eye Movements in Humans in a Gap Paradigm , 2013, PloS one.

[84]  K. Kiehl,et al.  A supramodal limbic‐paralimbic‐neocortical network supports goal‐directed stimulus processing , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[85]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Topological FDR for neuroimaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[86]  C. Brunia,et al.  Distribution of slow brain potentials related to motor preparation and stimulus anticipation in a time estimation task. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[87]  Philippe Boulinguez,et al.  Proactive inhibitory control of movement assessed by event-related fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[88]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.