Testing the Key Performance of Mobile Flood Protection System

Mobile flood protection systems provide a standardized flood protection method with high reliability. A comprehensive test site for mobile flood wall was established with the support of real applications, which provided opportunities to perform various tests. The anchor plate installation, seepage characteristics, and stress behavior of mobile flood protection systems were investigated through a process test, a water impounding test, and a post loading/unloading test. Test results indicated that installing anchor plates either by direct fixing or by preopened slots and eyes satisfy the construction and normal work requirements. However, the former is preferable over the latter. The mobile flood protection wall leaks when filled with water, and the leakage changes exponentially with the level. The leakage accelerates when the water level exceeds 1.5 m, thus registering 300 L/h at the 1.7 m level. In the post loading test (0–100 kN), concrete plastic deformation was first observed. Then, residual displacement was developed in the posts. The stressing process indicated that the failure process in the post, anchor plate, and base concrete system propagates from the concrete on both sides of the anchor plates toward the water side.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  J. Köngeter,et al.  Mobile Flood Protection Walls - Experiments and Reflections on the Risk of Flood Waves Caused by a Failure , 1999 .

[3]  Thomas de Quincey [C] , 2000, The Works of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. 1: Writings, 1799–1820.

[4]  Jochen Hinkel,et al.  Integrating knowledge to assess coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise : the development of the DIVA tool , 2009 .

[5]  B. Merz,et al.  Significance of "high probability/low damage" versus "low probability/high damage" flood events , 2009 .

[6]  B. Koppe,et al.  OPPORTUNITIES AND DRAWBACKS OF MOBILE FLOOD PROTECTION SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[7]  L. Bouwer Have disaster losses increased due to anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .

[8]  B. Koppe,et al.  Development and Testing of Water-Filled Tube Systems for Flood Protection Measures , 2011 .

[9]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global flood risk under climate change , 2013 .

[10]  Scott D. Hamshaw,et al.  Rapid Flood Exposure Assessment of Vermont Mobile Home Parks Following Tropical Storm Irene , 2014 .

[11]  Simen Strømsnes Concept development of all-new flood protection system , 2015 .

[12]  István Kádár Mobile Flood Protection Walls , 2015 .

[13]  C. Topp,et al.  A guide towards climate change adaptation in the livestock sector: adaptation options and the role of robust decision-making tools for their economic appraisal , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[14]  M. Diakakis,et al.  Mapping and classification of direct flood impacts in the complex conditions of an urban environment. The case study of the 2014 flood in Athens, Greece , 2017 .

[15]  W. Botzen,et al.  Economic evaluation of climate risk adaptation strategies: Cost-benefit analysis of flood protection in Tabasco, Mexico , 2017 .

[16]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[17]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.