Co‐opted board, environment, social and governance

The ultimate goal shared by society is sustainable development, a process of addressing current needs without sacrificing resources of future generations. To achieve sustainability, companies should consider of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) in their stakeholder engagement process. Investment in ESG activities is unavoidably decided at the board, making board characteristics become crucial for sustainability. We explore the effect of co‐opted directors, appointed after the incumbent CEO assumes office, on corporate ESG performance. Our findings show that firms with co‐opted directors tend to have poorer ESG performance. Investing in ESG is a long‐run corporate policy. Consistent with the managerial myopia hypothesis, the co‐opted directors, representing weaker governance mechanisms with ineffective monitoring roles, provide managers fewer incentives to invest in the long run. We address endogeneity concerns by conducting instrumental variable analyses.

[1]  Director Expertise and Corporate Sustainability , 2023, Review of Finance.

[2]  Alex Edmans.  The End of ESG , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  I. Sifat,et al.  Co-opted Board and Firm Climate Change Risk , 2022, Finance Research Letters.

[4]  Muhammad Umar,et al.  ESG scores and target price accuracy: Evidence from sell-side recommendations in BRICS , 2022, International Review of Financial Analysis.

[5]  Oneil Harris,et al.  Director co-option and future market share growth , 2022, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.

[6]  John J. Hampton,et al.  Director co‐option and the cash conversion cycle , 2022, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance.

[7]  Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan,et al.  Do Co-opted boards affect the cost of equity capital? , 2021, Finance Research Letters.

[8]  Jia Liu,et al.  Fiduciary duty or loyalty? Evidence from co-opted boards and corporate misconduct , 2021, Journal of Corporate Finance.

[9]  Oneil Harris,et al.  Co-opted boards and earnings management: Evidence of reduced short-termist behavior , 2021, BRQ Business Research Quarterly.

[10]  Xiangkang Yin,et al.  The Bright Side of Co-Opted Boards: Evidence from Firm Innovation , 2021, Financial Review.

[11]  Stuart L. Gillan,et al.  Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance , 2021, Journal of Corporate Finance.

[12]  George Serafeim,et al.  Stock price reactions to ESG news: the role of ESG ratings and disagreement , 2021, Review of Accounting Studies.

[13]  P. Jiraporn,et al.  Do co-opted boards strategically choose LGBT-supportive policies? , 2020 .

[14]  Kee-Hong Bae,et al.  Does CSR matter in times of crisis? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of Corporate Finance.

[15]  C. Klein,et al.  The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.

[16]  Ross Levine,et al.  Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of Financial Economics.

[17]  R. Albuquerque,et al.  Resiliency of Environmental and Social Stocks: An Analysis of the Exogenous COVID-19 Market Crash , 2020, The Review of Corporate Finance Studies.

[18]  Winston S. Buckley,et al.  Do co-opted boards enhance or reduce R&D productivity? , 2019, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.

[19]  Lilian Ng,et al.  Socially Responsible Corporate Customers , 2019, Journal of Financial Economics.

[20]  Ghasan A. Baghdadi,et al.  Board Co-Option and Default Risk , 2019, Journal of Corporate Finance.

[21]  J. Ganuza,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Product Quality , 2018, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.

[22]  Hao Liang,et al.  Peer Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[23]  P. Jiraporn,et al.  Do Co-Opted Directors Influence Dividend Policy? , 2017, Financial Management.

[24]  Karl V. Lins,et al.  Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis: Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance , 2017 .

[25]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance , 2017, Journal of Business Ethics.

[26]  J. Galbreath.  The Impact of Board Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: A Temporal View , 2017 .

[27]  J. Vieito,et al.  The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms , 2017 .

[28]  G. Trojanowski,et al.  Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance , 2016 .

[29]  P. Jiraporn,et al.  Do Co-Opted Directors Mitigate Managerial Myopia? Evidence from R&D Investments , 2016 .

[30]  M. Harjoto,et al.  Board Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[31]  H. Tehranian,et al.  Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility , 2015 .

[32]  Gregor Dorfleitner,et al.  The wages of social responsibility — where are they? A critical review of ESG investing , 2015 .

[33]  Joseph H. Zhang,et al.  Firms’ earnings smoothing, corporate social responsibility, and valuation , 2015 .

[34]  Omer Farooq,et al.  'Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees' collectivist orientation' , 2014 .

[35]  L. Renneboog,et al.  Socially Responsible Firms , 2014 .

[36]  J. Houston,et al.  Corporate Socially Responsible Investments: CEO Altruism, Reputation, and Shareholder Interests , 2014 .

[37]  Jeffrey L. Coles,et al.  Co-opted Boards , 2013 .

[38]  Chendi Zhang,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era , 2012, Journal of Business Ethics.

[40]  Alex Edmans.  The Link Between Job Satisfaction and Firm Value, with Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility , 2012 .

[41]  Henri Servaes,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[42]  Leonard Kostovetsky,et al.  Are Red or Blue Companies More Likely to Go Green? Politics and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[43]  James S. Linck,et al.  Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance , 2011 .

[44]  Sudheer Chava,et al.  Environmental Externalities and Cost of Capital , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[45]  H. Jo,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2011 .

[46]  Maretno A. Harjoto,et al.  Corporate Governance and CSR Nexus , 2011 .

[47]  Omrane Guedhami,et al.  Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? , 2010 .

[48]  Noushi Rahman,et al.  The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation , 2010 .

[49]  Alex Edmans,et al.  Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices , 2010 .

[50]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[51]  M. Statman,et al.  The Wages of Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[52]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Business Ethics: Corporate Responses to Scandal , 2004 .

[53]  M. C. Jensen.  Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function* , 2001, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[54]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision making groups , 1999 .

[55]  R. Freeman.  The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[56]  R. Gregory.  ESG activities and firm cash flow , 2022, Global Finance Journal.

[57]  O. Zerbib.  The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds , 2019, Journal of Banking & Finance.

[58]  M. Friedman.  The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[59]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .