The bouncing motion appearing in a robotic system with unilateral constraint

The hopping or bouncing motion can be observed when robotic manipulators are sliding on a rough surface. Making clear the reason of generating such phenomenon is important for the control and dynamical analysis for mechanical systems. In particular, such phenomenon may be related to the problem of Painlevé paradox. By using LCP theory, a general criterion for identifying the bouncing motion appearing in a planar multibody system subject to single unilateral constraint is established, and found its application to a two-link robotic manipulator that comes in contact with a rough constantly moving belt. The admissible set in state space that can assure the manipulator keeping contact with the rough surface is investigated, and found which is influenced by the value of the friction coefficient and the configuration of the system. Painlevé paradox can cause either multiple solutions or non-existence of solutions in calculating contact force. Developing some methods to fill in the flaw is also important for perfecting the theory of rigid-body dynamics. The properties of the tangential impact relating to the inconsistent case of Painlevé paradox have been discovered in this paper, and a jump rule for determining the post-states after the tangential impact finishes is developed. Finally, the comprehensively numerical simulation for the two-link robotic manipulator is carried out, and its dynamical behaviors such as stick-slip, the bouncing motion due to the tangential impact at contact point or the external forces, are exhibited.

[1]  J. Keller Impact With Friction , 1986 .

[2]  H. Cohen,et al.  The occurrence of Painleve's paradox in the motion of a rotating shaft , 1997 .

[3]  É. Delassus Sur les lois du frottement de glissement , 1923 .

[4]  Per Lötstedt Mechanical Systems of Rigid Bodies Subject to Unilateral Constraints , 1982 .

[5]  Raymond M. Brach Impact Coefficients and Tangential Impacts , 1997 .

[6]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Periodic motion and bifurcations induced by the Painlevé paradox , 2002 .

[7]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Results for Longitudinal Impacts on Elastic Rods , 2003 .

[8]  G. Stavroulakis Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts by Friedrich Pfeiffer and Christoph Glocker, Wiley, New York, 1996 , 1998 .

[9]  É. Delassus Considérations sur le frottement de glissement , 1920 .

[10]  Per Lötstedt Coulomb Friction in Two-Dimensional Rigid Body Systems , 1981 .

[11]  B. Brogliato,et al.  New results on Painlevé paradoxes , 1999 .

[12]  S. Grigoryan The solution to the Painleve paradox for dry friction , 2001 .

[13]  Raouf A. Ibrahim,et al.  Friction-Induced Vibration, Chatter, Squeal, and Chaos—Part II: Dynamics and Modeling , 1994 .

[14]  David Baraff,et al.  Coping with friction for non-penetrating rigid body simulation , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  R. Fricke,et al.  Zu Painlevés Kritik der Coulombschen Reibungsgesetze , 1922 .

[16]  Pierre E. Dupont,et al.  Analysis of Rigid-Body Dynamic Models for Simulation of Systems With Frictional Contacts , 2001 .

[17]  Michael A. Erdmann,et al.  On a Representation of Friction in Configuration Space , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  The numerical method for three-dimensional impact with friction of multi-rigid-body system , 2006 .

[19]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts , 1996 .

[20]  D. Stewart Convergence of a Time‐Stepping Scheme for Rigid‐Body Dynamics and Resolution of Painlevé's Problem , 1998 .

[21]  Jeff Koechling,et al.  Partitioning the Parameter Space According to Different Behaviors During Three-Dimensional Impacts , 1995 .

[22]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Three Approaches for Elastodynamic Contact in Multibody Systems , 2004 .

[23]  David E. Stewart,et al.  Rigid-Body Dynamics with Friction and Impact , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[24]  金海,et al.  Impact model resolution on Painlevé's paradox , 2004 .

[25]  J. A. Batlle Rough Balanced Collisions , 1996 .

[26]  M. T. Mason,et al.  Two-Dimensional Rigid-Body Collisions With Friction , 1992 .

[27]  Bernard Brogliato,et al.  Some perspectives on the analysis and control of complementarity systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[28]  Christoph Glocker,et al.  Oblique Frictional Impact of a Bar: Analysis and Comparison of Different Impact Laws , 2005 .

[29]  Singularities in the dynamics of systems with non-ideal constraints☆ , 2003 .

[30]  J. Moreau,et al.  Unilateral Contact and Dry Friction in Finite Freedom Dynamics , 1988 .