The Influence of Technology Differences on Corporate Environmental Patents: A Resource-Based Versus an Institutional View of Green Innovations

This paper proposes that both the resource-based view and institutional theory predict a positive relationship between the number of patented environmental innovations and non-environmental innovations held by a firm, because they both are subject to the influence of similar factors. However, while the resource-based view predicts that technological differences between the patented environmental innovations owned by a firm and those in the industry as a whole will positively affect the firm's environmental innovations, the institutional perspective predicts a negative relationship. Our results derive from a sample of 5537 environmental patents from 59 large companies in the electrical components and equipment industry worldwide, and show a positive relationship between patented environmental and non-environmental innovations in a firm, but a negative influence on the number of the firm's patented environmental innovations resulting from differences between the firm's environmental technologies and those generally prevalent in the industry. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

[1]  M. Alonso‐Almeida,et al.  A Fresh Approach to Context Influence, Development and Performance in Environmental Management , 2015 .

[2]  Pablo del Río,et al.  Distinctive Features of Environmental Innovators: An Econometric Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  A. Hoffman,et al.  The New Heretics , 2014 .

[4]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management , 2014 .

[5]  M. Knudsen,et al.  Sustainable Development Strategies for Product Innovation and Energy Efficiency , 2014 .

[6]  C. Dienes,et al.  Environmental Innovations and Strategies for the Development of New Production Technologies: Empirical Evidence from Europe , 2013 .

[7]  Javier Aguilera-Caracuel,et al.  Green Innovation and Financial Performance , 2013 .

[8]  Mark Starik,et al.  Organization & Environment , 2013 .

[9]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  Necessity as the mother of ‘green’ inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations , 2013 .

[10]  S. Wong.  Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the Electronics Industry in China , 2013 .

[11]  Helena Forsman.  Environmental Innovations as a Source of Competitive Advantage or Vice Versa , 2013 .

[12]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in Energy Technologies , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Kees Maat,et al.  The competitive environment of electric vehicles: An analysis of prototype and production models , 2012 .

[14]  C. Herstatt,et al.  Green Innovation in Technology and Innovation Management – An Exploratory Literature Review , 2012 .

[15]  Ki‐Hoon Lee,et al.  Integrating Suppliers into Green Product Innovation Development: an Empirical Case Study in the Semiconductor Industry , 2011 .

[16]  David A. Hounshell,et al.  Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry , 2011 .

[17]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  Firms, Regulatory Uncertainty, and the Natural Environment , 2011 .

[18]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research , 2011, International Journal of Management Reviews.

[19]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Organizational factors and technological features in the development of green innovations: Evidence from patent analysis , 2011 .

[20]  Gavin Clarkson,et al.  ‘Keep out’ signs: the role of deterrence in the competition for resources , 2010 .

[21]  Minna Halme,et al.  The other side of sustainable innovation: is there a demand for innovative services? , 2010 .

[22]  Marina Apaydin,et al.  A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010 .

[23]  Maïder Saint Jean,et al.  Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry , 2009 .

[24]  Michael Jensen,et al.  Staging Exchange Partner Choices: When Do Status and Reputation Matter? , 2008 .

[25]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  The Influence of Stakeholders on the Environmental Strategy of Service Firms: The Moderating Effects of Complexity, Uncertainty and Munificence , 2008 .

[26]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmentalthreat on Product Exploration and Exploitation , 2008 .

[27]  Luca Berchicci,et al.  11 Postcards from the Edge , 2007 .

[28]  J. Bessant,et al.  Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .

[29]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Firm-level Innovation Models: Perspectives on Research in Developed and Developing Countries , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[30]  M. Albert,et al.  Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents , 2004 .

[31]  César Camisón-Zornoza,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size , 2004 .

[32]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[33]  T. Elkins,et al.  Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework , 2003 .

[34]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective , 2003 .

[35]  Brian Higgins.  Adding business value: a strategy for identifying and patenting environment‐related inventions and avoiding patent infringement , 2003 .

[36]  R. Parthasarthy,et al.  Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process , 2002 .

[37]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[38]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[39]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[40]  A. Hoffman.  Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry , 1999 .

[41]  Roderick E. White,et al.  An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution , 1999 .

[42]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[43]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[45]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation , 1996 .

[46]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[47]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[48]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[49]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[50]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[51]  Á. Triguero,et al.  Leaders and Laggards in Environmental Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of SMEs in Europe , 2016 .

[52]  Abraham Haim,et al.  The ecological footprint as an educational tool for sustainability: A case study analysis in an Israeli public high school , 2012 .

[53]  Luca Berchicci,et al.  Postcards from the Edge: A Review of the Business and Environment Literature , 2008 .

[54]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[55]  M. Reitzig.  What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry , 2003 .

[56]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy , 2003 .

[57]  H. Ernst.  Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level , 2001 .

[58]  Environment,et al.  Environmental auditing : report of a United Nations Environment Programme/Industry and Environment (UNEP/IEO) Workshop, Paris, 10-11 January 1989 , 1990 .