Orientation-Independent Catheter-Based Characterization of Myocardial Activation

Cardiac electrogram (EGM) signals and electrophysiologic (EP) characteristics derived from them such as amplitude and timing are central to the diagnosis and therapeutic management of arrhythmias. Bipolar EGMs are often used but possess polarity and shape dependence on catheter orientation contributing to uncertainty. Objective: We describe a novel method to map cardiac activation that resolves signals into meaningful directions and is insensitive to electrode directional effects. Methods: Multielectrode catheters that span 2- and 3-D space are used to derive local electric field (E-field) signals. A traveling wave model of local EGM propagation motivates a new “omnipolar” reference frame in which to understand EGM E-field signals and provide bipolar component EGMs aligned with these anatomic and physiologic directions. We validate the basis of this technology and determine its accuracy using a saline tank in which we simulate physiologic propagation. Results: Omnipole signals from healthy tissue are nearly free of catheter orientation effects and are constrained by biophysics to consistent morphologies and thus consistent measured amplitudes and timings. Using a 3-D EP mapping system, traveling wave treatment, and omnipolar technology (OT) E-field loops, we derived a new and nearly instantaneous means to determine conduction velocity and activation direction. Conclusion: We describe the basis of OT and validate it with ablation and mapping catheters in a saline tank. Finally, we illustrate OT with signals from live subjects. Significance: OT's novel approach with signal processing and real-time visualization allows for a newly detailed characterization of myocardial activation that is insensitive to catheter orientation.

[1]  R. Damle,et al.  Atrial and accessory pathway activation direction in patients with orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia: insights from vector mapping. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  Estimation of Cardiac Conduction Velocities Using Small Data Sets , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Tamara N. Fitzgerald,et al.  Identification of cardiac rhythm features by mathematical analysis of vector fields , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Kalyanam Shivkumar,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Localized Sources Identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation , 2015, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[5]  Yu-Chi Lai,et al.  Lesion size estimator of cardiac radiofrequency ablation at different common locations with different tip temperatures , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Michela Masè,et al.  Velocity Field Analysis of Activation Maps in Atrial Fibrillation A Simulation Study , 2009 .

[7]  A. Sahakian,et al.  Detection of changes in atrial endocardial activation with use of an orthogonal catheter. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  High-density mapping of atrial fibrillation in a chronic substrate: evidence for distinct modes of repetitive wavefront propagation. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Relationship between voltage map "channels" and the location of critical isthmus sites in patients with post-infarction cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  E. V. Simpson,et al.  The Assumptions of Isochronal Cardiac Mapping , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  S. Labarthe,et al.  Global and Directional Activation maps for cardiac mapping in electrophysiology , 2012, 2012 Computing in Cardiology.

[12]  J. Spear,et al.  Vector mapping of myocardial activation. , 1986, Circulation.

[13]  Ziad F Issa Chapter 4 – Electrophysiological Testing , 2012 .

[14]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Ziad F. Issa,et al.  Chapter 6 – Advanced Mapping and Navigation Modalities , 2012 .

[16]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Wave-Direction and Conduction-Velocity Analysis From Intracardiac Electrograms–A Single-Shot Technique , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J. Seward,et al.  The Effect of Ablation Electrode Length and Catheter Tip to Endocardial Orientation on Radiofrequency Lesion Size in the Canine Right Atrium , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  R. Ideker,et al.  Estimation of conduction velocity vector fields from epicardial mapping data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Jacques M T de Bakker,et al.  The Pathophysiologic Basis of Fractionated and Complex Electrograms and the Impact of Recording Techniques on Their Detection and Interpretation , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[20]  A. Kadish,et al.  Chapter 7 – Fundamentals of Intracardiac Mapping , 2006 .

[21]  Elad Anter,et al.  Substrate Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia: Assumptions and Misconceptions. , 2015, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[22]  Nicholas S Peters,et al.  The Rotor Revolution: Conduction at the Eye of the Storm in Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.