CryoSat Ice Baseline-D validation and evolutions

Abstract. The ESA Earth Explorer CryoSat-2 was launched on 8 April 2010 to monitor the precise changes in the thickness of terrestrial ice sheets and marine floating ice. To do that, CryoSat orbits the planet at an altitude of around 720 km with a retrograde orbit inclination of 92∘ and a quasi repeat cycle of 369 d (30 d subcycle). To reach the mission goals, the CryoSat products have to meet the highest quality standards to date, achieved through continual improvements of the operational processing chains. The new CryoSat Ice Baseline-D, in operation since 27 May 2019, represents a major processor upgrade with respect to the previous Ice Baseline-C. Over land ice the new Baseline-D provides better results with respect to the previous baseline when comparing the data to a reference elevation model over the Austfonna ice cap region, improving the ascending and descending crossover statistics from 1.9 to 0.1 m. The improved processing of the star tracker measurements implemented in Baseline-D has led to a reduction in the standard deviation of the point-to-point comparison with the previous star tracker processing method implemented in Baseline-C from 3.8 to 3.7 m. Over sea ice, Baseline-D improves the quality of the retrieved heights inside and at the boundaries of the synthetic aperture radar interferometric (SARIn or SIN) acquisition mask, removing the negative freeboard pattern which is beneficial not only for freeboard retrieval but also for any application that exploits the phase information from SARIn Level 1B (L1B) products. In addition, scatter comparisons with the Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project (BGEP; https://www.whoi.edu/beaufortgyre, last access: October 2019) and Operation IceBridge (OIB; Kurtz et al., 2013) in situ measurements confirm the improvements in the Baseline-D freeboard product quality. Relative to OIB, the Baseline-D freeboard mean bias is reduced by about 8 cm, which roughly corresponds to a 60 % decrease with respect to Baseline-C. The BGEP data indicate a similar tendency with a mean draft bias lowered from 0.85 to −0.14 m. For the two in situ datasets, the root mean square deviation (RMSD) is also well reduced from 14 to 11 cm for OIB and by a factor of 2 for the BGEP. Observations over inland waters show a slight increase in the percentage of good observations in Baseline-D, generally around 5 %–10 % for most lakes. This paper provides an overview of the new Level 1 and Level 2 (L2) CryoSat Ice Baseline-D evolutions and related data quality assessment, based on results obtained from analyzing the 6-month Baseline-D test dataset released to CryoSat expert users prior to the final transfer to operations.

[1]  Michele Scagliola,et al.  Improving CryoSat-2 SARIn L1b Products to Account for Inaccurate Phase Difference: Impact on Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval , 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  S. Hendricks,et al.  Product User Guide & Algorithm Specification: AWI CryoSat-2 Sea Ice Thickness (version 2.2) , 2019 .

[3]  Reinhard Dietrich,et al.  Four decades of Antarctic surface elevation changes from multi-mission satellite altimetry , 2019, The Cryosphere.

[4]  Myoung-Jong Noh,et al.  The Reference Elevation Model of Antarctica , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[5]  T. Parrinello,et al.  Uncertainty reduction of Arctic sea ice freeboard from CryoSat-2 interferometric mode , 2018, Advances in Space Research.

[6]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  Validation of CryoSat-2 SARIn Data over Austfonna Ice Cap Using Airborne Laser Scanner Measurements , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Stefan Kern,et al.  Empirical parametrization of Envisat freeboard retrieval of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice based on CryoSat-2: progress in the ESA Climate Change Initiative , 2018, The Cryosphere.

[8]  Michele Scagliola,et al.  CryoSat instrument performance and ice product quality status , 2018, Advances in Space Research.

[9]  P. Féménias,et al.  CryoSat ocean product quality status and future evolution , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[10]  A. Muir,et al.  CryoSat-2 swath interferometric altimetry for mapping ice elevation and elevation change , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[11]  Andrew Shepherd,et al.  Estimating Arctic sea ice thickness and volume using CryoSat-2 radar altimeter data , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[12]  Michele Scagliola,et al.  The CryoSat interferometer: End-to-end calibration and achievable performance , 2017 .

[13]  Denise Dettmering,et al.  Lead detection using Cryosat-2 delay-doppler processing and Sentinel-1 SAR images , 2017, Advances in Space Research.

[14]  R. Forsberg,et al.  ESA CryoVEx/EU ICE-ARC 2016 - Airborne field campaign with ASIRAS radar and laser scanner over Austfonna, Fram Strait and the Wandel Sea , 2018 .

[15]  Kate Snow,et al.  Channelized Melting Drives Thinning Under a Rapidly Melting Antarctic Ice Shelf , 2017 .

[16]  J. Im,et al.  Arctic lead detection using a waveform mixture algorithm from CryoSat-2 data , 2017 .

[17]  Philippe Maisongrande,et al.  Comparison of CryoSat-2 and ENVISAT radar freeboard over Arctic sea ice: toward an improved Envisat freeboard retrieval , 2017 .

[18]  Luke Copland,et al.  A revised calibration of the interferometric mode of the CryoSat-2 radar altimeter improves ice height and height change measurements in western Greenland , 2017 .

[19]  Louise Sandberg Sørensen,et al.  Implications of changing scattering properties on Greenland ice sheet volume change from Cryosat-2 altimetry , 2017 .

[20]  Peter Bauer-Gottwein,et al.  Monitoring recent lake level variations on the Tibetan Plateau using CryoSat-2 SARIn mode data , 2017 .

[21]  A. Gardner,et al.  Improved retrieval of land ice topography from CryoSat-2 data and its impact for volume-change estimation of the Greenland Ice Sheet , 2016 .

[22]  Peter Nygaard Godiksen,et al.  Application of CryoSat-2 altimetry data for river analysis and modelling , 2016 .

[23]  Ole Baltazar Andersen,et al.  Validation of CryoSat-2 SAR mode based lake levels , 2015 .

[24]  Ole Baltazar Andersen,et al.  CryoSat-2 altimetry for river level monitoring - Evaluation in the Ganges-Brahmaputra River basin , 2015 .

[25]  K. Langley,et al.  CryoSat-2 delivers monthly and inter-annual surface elevation change for Arctic ice caps , 2015 .

[26]  R. Kwok,et al.  Variability of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume from CryoSat-2 , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Michele Scagliola,et al.  Pitch Estimation for CryoSat by Analysis of Stacks of Single-Look Echoes , 2015, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[28]  Andreas Kääb,et al.  Glacier-surge mechanisms promoted by a hydro-thermodynamic feedback to summer melt , 2015 .

[29]  Robert Ricker,et al.  Sensitivity of CryoSat-2 Arctic sea-ice freeboard and thickness on radar-waveform interpretation , 2014 .

[30]  Angelika Humbert,et al.  Elevation and elevation change of Greenland and Antarctica derived from CryoSat-2 , 2014 .

[31]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  Increased ice losses from Antarctica detected by CryoSat‐2 , 2014 .

[32]  Michael Studinger,et al.  An Improved CryoSat-2 Sea Ice Freeboard Retrieval Algorithm Through the Use of Waveform Fitting , 2014 .

[33]  Dorthe Dahl-Jensen,et al.  Greenland 2012 melt event effects on CryoSat‐2 radar altimetry , 2014 .

[34]  Michele Scagliola,et al.  CryoSat: Siral calibration and performance , 2014, 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[35]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  Using the Interferometric Capabilities of the ESA CryoSat-2 Mission to Improve the Accuracy of Sea Ice Freeboard Retrievals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  R. Cullen,et al.  Interferometric swath processing of Cryosat data for glacial ice topography , 2013 .

[37]  Natalia Galin,et al.  Sea ice thickness, freeboard, and snow depth products from Operation IceBridge airborne data , 2013 .

[38]  Jon Ove Hagen,et al.  Seasonal speed-up of two outlet glaciers of Austfonna, Svalbard, inferred from continuous GPS measurements , 2011 .

[39]  Refined analysis of radar altimetry data applied to the region of the subglacial Lake Vostok/Antarctica , 2007 .

[40]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands , 2004 .

[41]  Neil Peacock,et al.  High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region , 2003, Nature.

[42]  Vladimir F. Radionov,et al.  Snow Depth on Arctic Sea Ice , 1999 .

[43]  R. Keith Raney,et al.  The delay/Doppler radar altimeter , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[44]  Sarel Van Vuuren Pitch estimation , 1998 .