Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation

Are emotions perceived automatically? Two psychological refractory period experiments were conducted to ascertain whether emotion perception requires central attentional resources. Task 1 required an auditory discrimination (tone vs. noise), whereas Task 2 required a discrimination between happy and angry faces. The difficulty of Task 2 was manipulated by varying the degree of emotional expression. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between Task 1 and Task 2 was also varied. Experiment 1 revealed additive effects of SOA and Task 2 emotion-perception difficulty. Experiment 2 replicated the additive relationship with a stronger manipulation of emotion-perception difficulty. According to locus-of-slack logic, our participants did not process emotional expressions while central resources were devoted to Task 1. We conclude that emotion perception is not fully automatic.

[1]  B. Hommel,et al.  How distinctive is affective processing? On the implications of using cognitive paradigms to study affect and emotion , 2007 .

[2]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  On the nonautomaticity of visual word processing: electrophysiological evidence that word processing requires central attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  P. Jolicoeur.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task1 decisions , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for two Types of Attention , 1995 .

[5]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  H Pashler,et al.  Attentional limits in memory retrieval. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[13]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  H. Okon-Singer,et al.  Distinguishing between automaticity and attention in the processing of emotionally significant stimuli. , 2007, Emotion.

[15]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[16]  H Pashler,et al.  Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R W Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[19]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Load-dependent modulation of affective picture processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .