Incentive Systems to Support Collaboration in Construction Projects

In Germany construction projects are based on traditional contracts with competitive bidding, which do not support collaboration. The behavior of non-cooperation results in a mass of claims and problems by the final inspection up to legal proceedings. Furthermore, the complex and dynamic environment as well as the asymmetric information between the participants of a construction project lead to uncertainty, which often ends in conflicts between contractor and client. To fight against the uncertainty a collaborative project environment based on an incentive system has to be built in order to share information and knowledge. The theory of incentive systems mostly concentrates on material incentives particularly on financial incentives, while the intrinsic motivation of the participants has a very high impact of the project success. By reviewing the literature it can be hypothesized that the implementation of an incentive system consisting of monetary and non-monetary incentives will increase the total project performance. Therefore, this paper will focus on managing an incentive system to support the collaboration in a construction project in order to realize the optimal delivery of the project. In the end of the paper suggestions for further research are given.

[1]  Hal Macomber,et al.  Linguistic Action: Contributing to the Theory of Lean Construction , 2003 .

[2]  William F. Maloney.  Motivation in Construction: A Review , 1981 .

[3]  Johannes I.M. Halman,et al.  Innovation and interorganizational cooperation: a synthesis of literature , 2009 .

[4]  Hans Spada,et al.  Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science , 1995 .

[5]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[6]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Social Construction: Understanding Construction in a Human Context , 2010 .

[7]  Patricia M. Carrillo,et al.  Planning and implementation of effective collaboration in construction projects , 2007 .

[8]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[9]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  An Optimised Project Requires Optimised Incentives , 2010 .

[10]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Review and implementation of performance management models in construction engineering organizations , 2005 .

[11]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  MANAGING THE THREE ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[12]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Risk/Reward Compensation Model for Civil Engineering Infrastructure Alliance Projects , 2011 .

[13]  Fred G. Becker.  Anreizsysteme für Führungskräfte : Möglichkeiten zur strategisch-orientierten Steuerung des Managements , 1990 .

[14]  Martin Kornberger,et al.  The Art of Managing Relationships in Interorganizational Collaboration , 2004 .

[15]  Yunus Kathawala,et al.  Traditional Performance Appraisal Systems: The Deming Challenge , 1992 .

[16]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[17]  Frtiz Gehbauer.  Lean Organization: Exploring Extended Potentials of the Last Planner System , 2008 .

[18]  Lutz von Rosenstiel.  Die motivationalen Grundlagen des Verhaltens in Organisationen : Leistung und Zufriedenheit , 1975 .

[19]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  The strategic importance of tacit knowledge management activities in construction , 2010 .

[20]  J. Kuhl.  Individuelle Unterschiede in der Selbststeuerung , 2006 .

[21]  Z. Irani,et al.  Strategic alliances: a model for establishing long-term commitment to inter-organizational relations in construction , 2004 .

[22]  P. Love,et al.  Price Competitive Alliance Projects: Identification of Success Factors for Public Clients , 2010 .

[23]  John D. Borcherding,et al.  Financial Incentives to Raise Productivity , 1981 .

[24]  T. Das,et al.  Managing risks in strategic alliances , 1999 .