Clinical Verification of Hearing Aid Performance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R M Cox,et al. Evaluation of an in-situ output probe-microphone method for hearing aid fitting verification. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[2] Harvey Dillon,et al. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[3] R W Gengel,et al. A frequency-response procedure for evaluating and selecting hearing aids for severely hearing-impaired children. , 1971, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[4] Brian C J Moore,et al. The value of routine real ear measurement of the gain of digital hearing aids. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[5] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] H Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' Procedure for Selecting the Saturation Sound Pressure Level of Hearing Aids: Experimental Validation , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[7] P G Stelmachowicz,et al. Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. , 1989, Ear and hearing.
[8] B. Moore,et al. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] C. Turner,et al. Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1999, American journal of audiology.
[11] Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al. Clinical Measures of Hearing Aid Directivity: Assumption, Accuracy, and Reliability , 2012, Ear and hearing.
[12] D D Dirks,et al. Basic Acoustic Considerations of Ear Canal: Probe Measurements , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[13] S Buus,et al. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[14] B C Moore,et al. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally , 2001, British journal of audiology.
[15] Harvey Dillon,et al. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions for children: Paired-comparison intelligibility judgments and functional performance ratings , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[16] N P Erber. Body-baffle and real-ear effects in the selection of hearing aids for deaf children. , 1973, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[17] H. Gustav Mueller,et al. Survey examines popularity of real-ear probe-microphone measures , 2010 .
[18] Sheila Moodie,et al. The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[19] B. Moore,et al. The Effect of Low-Pass Filtering on Identification of Nonsense Syllables in Quiet by School-Age Children With and Without Cochlear Dead Regions , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[20] P. Newall,et al. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[21] H. Gustav Mueller,et al. MarkeTrak VIII: The Impact of the Hearing Healthcare Professional on Hearing Aid User Success , 2010 .
[22] D. Mason,et al. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[23] Gitte Keidser,et al. NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments , 2012, Trends in amplification.
[24] B C Moore,et al. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.
[25] Robyn M. Cox,et al. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995 .
[26] P G Stelmachowicz,et al. The effect of reference microphone placement on sound pressure levels at an ear level hearing aid microphone. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[27] Kevin J Munro,et al. Measuring the Real-Ear to Coupler Difference Transfer Function With an Insert Earphone and a Hearing Instrument: Are They the Same? , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[28] D Wigney,et al. Comparison of severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children's amplification preferences with the NAL-RP and the DSL 3.0 prescriptions. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.
[29] Mark Smith,et al. Using probe-microphone measurements to improve the match to target gain and frequency response slope, as a function of earmould style, frequency, and input level , 2016, International journal of audiology.
[30] H. Dillon,et al. An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .
[31] Gitte Keidser,et al. Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[32] L Magnusson,et al. Predicted and Measured Speech Recognition Performance in Noise with Linear Amplification , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[33] R C Seewald,et al. Selecting Amplification Characteristics for Young Hearing‐Impaired Children , 1985, Ear and hearing.
[34] D. Byrne,et al. Selecting the Gain of Hearing Aids for Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Impairments , 1976 .
[35] K J Munro,et al. Customized Acoustic Transform Functions and Their Accuracy at Predicting Real‐Ear Hearing Aid Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[36] Susan Scollie,et al. Predictive Validity of a Procedure for Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting , 1999 .
[37] Gitte Keidser,et al. Proprietary fitting algorithms compared with one another and with generic formulas , 2003 .
[39] Earl E. Johnson,et al. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[40] R C Seewald,et al. Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: comparison to prescriptive targets. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[41] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[42] H. Gustav Mueller,et al. Open‐canal fittings: Ten take‐home tips , 2006 .
[43] M. Killion,et al. Twenty years later: A NEW Count-The-Dots method , 2010 .
[44] Thomas A. Powers,et al. Algorithm lets users train aid to optimize compression, frequency shape, and gain , 2009 .
[45] B. Moore. Cochlear hearing loss : physiological, psychological and technical issues , 2014 .
[46] Sheila Moodie,et al. A comparison of manufacturer-specific prescriptive procedures for infants , 2008 .
[47] S. Scollie,et al. The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP) , 2011, Trends in amplification.
[48] Michael A Stone,et al. Estimated variability of real-ear insertion response (REIR) due to loudspeaker type and placement , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[49] Ryan W McCreery,et al. SHARP Updates Enable Audibility Estimates with Nonlinear Frequency Compression , 2014 .
[50] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS) , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[51] B. Moore. Dead Regions in the Cochlea: Conceptual Foundations, Diagnosis, and Clinical Applications , 2004, Ear and hearing.
[52] Gitte Keidser,et al. Real-Life Efficacy and Reliability of Training a Hearing Aid , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[53] K. Munro,et al. Comparison of Real-Ear to Coupler Difference Values in the Right and Left Ear of Adults Using Three Earmold Configurations , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[54] P. Dawes,et al. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable , 2013, International journal of audiology.
[55] B C Moore,et al. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. , 1999, British journal of audiology.
[56] Harvey Dillon,et al. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[57] D D Dirks,et al. Comparison of probe insertion methods on estimates of ear canal SPL. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[58] Sheila Moodie,et al. The DSL Method for Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting: Historical Perspective and Current Issues , 2005, Trends in amplification.
[59] M C Killion,et al. Insertion Gain Repeatability versus Loudspeaker Location: You Want Me to Put My Loudspeaker WHERE? , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[60] Harvey Dillon,et al. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .
[61] Susan D Scollie,et al. Real-ear-to-coupler difference predictions as a function of age for two coupling procedures. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[62] B C Moore. Use of a Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting. IV. Fitting Hearing Aids with Multi-Channel Compression so as to Restore ‘Normal’ Loudness for Speech at Different Levels , 2000, British journal of audiology.
[63] H G Mueller. Probe Microphone Measurements: 20 Years of Progress , 2001, Trends in amplification.
[64] Brian C J Moore,et al. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[65] P. Dawes,et al. The Placebo Effect and the Influence of Participant Expectation on Hearing Aid Trials , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[66] Brian C J Moore,et al. The accuracy of matching target insertion gains with open-fit hearing aids. , 2012, American journal of audiology.
[67] D. Dirks,et al. Optical method for measurement of ear canal length. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[68] R C Seewald,et al. Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech. , 1991, Ear and hearing.
[69] T. Ching,et al. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[70] A C Neuman,et al. The Selection and Validation of Output Sound Pressure Level in Multichannel Hearing Aids , 2001, Ear and hearing.
[71] R C Seewald,et al. The input/output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[72] Hawkins Db,et al. Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements. , 1991 .
[73] T. Ching,et al. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[74] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[75] Kevin J Munro,et al. Is the real-ear to coupler difference independent of the measurement earphone?: Es independiente del auricular de medición, la diferencia entre el oído real y el acoplador? , 2002, International journal of audiology.
[76] Brian C J Moore,et al. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[77] Brian C J Moore,et al. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 Hearing Aid Fitting Methods , 2013, Ear and hearing.