Estimating fugitive dust emission rates using an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel

Abstract Emissions from fugitive dust due to erosion of “natural” wind-blown surfaces are an increasingly important part of PM10 (particulate matter with sizes of 10 μm aerodynamic diameter) emission inventories. These inventories are particularly important to State Implementation Plans (SIP), the plan required for each state to file with the Federal government indicating how they will comply with the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA). However, techniques for determining the fugitive dust contribution to over all PM10 emissions are still in their developmental stages. In the past, the methods have included field monitoring stations, specialized field studies and field wind-tunnel studies. The measurements made in this paper allow for systematic determination of PM10 emission rates through the use of an environmental boundary layer wind tunnel in the laboratory. Near surface steady-state concentration profiles and velocity profiles are obtained in order to use a control volume approach to estimate emission rates. This methodology is applied to soils retrieved from the nation's single largest PM10 source, Owens (dry) Lake in California, to estimate emission rates during active storm periods. The estimated emission rates are comparable to those obtained from field studies and lend to the validity of this method for determining fugitive dust emission rates.

[1]  W. S. Chepil,et al.  DYNAMICS OF WIND EROSION: V. CUMULATIVE INTENSITY OF SOIL DRIFTING ACROSS ERODING FIELDS , 1945 .

[2]  W. Godwin.  Article in Press , 2000 .

[3]  D. Gillette,et al.  Microscale transport of sand‐sized soil aggregates eroded by wind , 1974 .

[4]  K. Pye.  Aeolian dust and dust deposits , 1987 .

[5]  D. Gillette,et al.  CAUSES OF THE FETCH EFFECT IN WIND EROSION , 1996 .

[6]  H. Heywood.  The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes , 1941, Nature.

[7]  T. R. Walker,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES PRODUCED BY WIND EROSION OF SANDY SOIL, HIGH PLAINS OF WEST TEXAS , 1977 .

[8]  D M Ono,et al.  Systematic Biases in Measured PM10 Values with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Approved Samplers at Owens Lake, California , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  K. Saxton,et al.  WIND EROSION AND PM10 EMISSIONS FROM AGRICULTURAL FIELDS ON THE COLUMBIA PLATEAU , 1996 .

[10]  C. I. Fairchild,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements of the resuspension of ideal particles , 1982 .

[11]  J. Reid,et al.  Saltating Particles, Playa Crusts and Dust Aerosols at Owens (dry) Lake, California , 1996 .

[12]  W. S. Chepil,et al.  DYNAMICS OF WIND EROSION: I. NATURE OF MOVEMENT OF SOIL BY WIND , 1945 .

[13]  Yaping Shao,et al.  Effect of Saltation Bombardment on the Entrainment of Dust by Wind , 1993 .

[14]  Stephan Borrmann,et al.  WIND TUNNEL EXPERIMENTS ON THE RESUSPENSION OF SUB-MICROMETER PARTICLES FROM A SAND SURFACE , 1987 .

[15]  D. Gillette,et al.  Measurements of Aerosol Size Distributions and Vertical Fluxes of Aerosols on Land Subject to Wind Erosion , 1972 .

[16]  Bruce R. White,et al.  A Wind-tunnel Study of Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Flow over Vegetated Surfaces to Suppress PM10 Emission on Owens (dry) Lake , 2000 .

[17]  D. Gillette,et al.  Large-scale variability of wind erosion mass flux rates , 1997 .

[18]  Thomas A. Cahill,et al.  Relation of vertical flux of particles smaller than 10 μm to total aeolian horizontal mass flux at Owens Lake , 1997 .

[19]  J. Deluisi,et al.  Optical depth, size distribution and flux of dust from Owens Lake, California , 1999 .

[20]  Bruce R. White,et al.  Definition and measurement of dust aeolian thresholds , 2004 .

[21]  R. Shaw,et al.  Boundary-layer flow structures associated with particle reentrainment , 1993 .