Auralization study of optimum reverberation times for speech intelligibility for normal and hearing-impaired listeners in classrooms with diffuse sound fields.

Speech-intelligibility tests auralized in a virtual classroom were used to investigate the optimal reverberation times for verbal communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults. The idealized classroom had simple geometry, uniform surface absorption, and an approximately diffuse sound field. It contained a speech source, a listener at a receiver position, and a noise source located at one of two positions. The relative output levels of the speech and noise sources were varied, along with the surface absorption and the corresponding reverberation time. The binaural impulse responses of the speech and noise sources in each classroom configuration were convolved with Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) and babble-noise signals. The resulting signals were presented to normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adult subjects to identify the configurations that gave the highest speech intelligibilities for the two groups. For both subject groups, when the speech source was closer to the listener than the noise source, the optimal reverberation time was zero. When the noise source was closer to the listener than the speech source, the optimal reverberation time included both zero and nonzero values. The results generally support previous theoretical results.

[1]  M. Hodgson Evidence of diffuse surface reflections in rooms , 1990 .

[2]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  J. S. Bradley Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics. , 2000, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Karl D. Kryter,et al.  A Proposed Clinical Test of Speech Discrimination , 1968 .

[9]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Murray Hodgson When is diffuse-field theory applicable? , 1996 .

[12]  J. Pickett,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.