Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions

The rapidly ageing population is placing increasing strain on healthcare services. Robots have been proposed as a way to assist people to stay healthy and safe in their own homes. However, despite the need for such assistive devices and the success of some healthcare robots, other robots have had a poor response. This article reviews the literature about human responses to healthcare robots and summarises the variables that have been found to influence responses. It may be possible to increase acceptance of healthcare robots by properly assessing the needs of the human user and then matching the robot’s role, appearance and behaviour to these needs. Because robots have limitations in their abilities, another way to increase acceptance may be to modify the expectations of users to better match robots’ abilities. More research needs to investigate potential users’ needs and expectations in specific situations and whether interventions to increase the match between robot and human can increase acceptance.

[1]  Alexander Libin,et al.  New Diagnostic Tool for Robotic Psychology and Robotherapy Studies , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[2]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  An Interactive Robot in a Nursing Home: Preliminary Remarks , 2005 .

[3]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch , 2006, CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006..

[4]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[5]  K. Pillemer,et al.  Abuse and neglect of elderly persons. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Cooperation with a robotic assistant , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Marilyn Kettering Murray,et al.  The Nursing Shortage: Past, Present, and Future , 2002, The Journal of nursing administration.

[8]  A. Horvath,et al.  Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. , 1989 .

[9]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Robots, Gender & Sensemaking: Sex Segregation’s Impact On Workers Making Sense Of a Mobile Autonomous Robot , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Songmin Jia,et al.  Real-Time Multimedia Applications in a Web-Based Robotic Telecare System , 2003, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[11]  N. Noury.  AILISA : experimental platforms to evaluate remote care and assistive technologies in gerontology , 2005, Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Enterprise networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, 2005. HEALTHCOM 2005..

[12]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Robot Therapy in a Care House - Change of Relationship among the Residents and Seal Robot during a 2-month Long Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Elaine B. Hyder,et al.  The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies , 2000, CUU '00.

[14]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  What People Assume about Humanoid and Animal-Type Robots: Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[15]  J. Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes , 2004 .

[16]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  User Personality Matching with a Hands-Off Robot for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Therapy , 2006, ISER.

[17]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Psychological Implications of Domestic Assistive Technology for the Elderly , 2007, PsychNology J..

[18]  Kristian Wasen.  Person-friendly robot interaction: social, psychological and technological impacts in health care work , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[19]  S. Czaja,et al.  Age differences in attitudes toward computers. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[20]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Robotic products to assist the aging population , 2005, Interactions.

[21]  David Geer,et al.  Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. , 1991, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Relationship between interaction with the mental commit robot and change of stress reaction of the elderly , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium (Cat. No.03EX694).

[23]  M. Matarić,et al.  Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics , 2007 .

[24]  Lars Oestreicher.  Cognitive, Social, Sociable or just Socially Acceptable Robots? , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[25]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  The Design of the Huggable: A Therapeutic Robotic Companion for Relational, Affective Touch , 2006, AAAI Fall Symposium: Caring Machines.

[26]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[27]  W. Banks,et al.  Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. , 2008, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[28]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[29]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[30]  Alexander Libin,et al.  Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists' point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[31]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Telerounding and patient satisfaction after surgery. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[32]  Ken Onishi.  "wakamaru", the Robot for Your Home , 2006 .

[33]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[34]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Human reactions to good and bad robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[35]  Robert Sparrow,et al.  In the hands of machines? The future of aged care , 2006, Minds and Machines.

[36]  Nora Super.  Who Will Be There to Care? The Growing Gap between Caregiver Supply and Demand , 2002 .

[37]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Robots as assistive technology - does appearance matter? , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[38]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[39]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[40]  Noriyuki Tejima,et al.  Rehabilitation robotics: a review , 2001, Adv. Robotics.

[41]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[42]  Mitesh Parekh,et al.  Robotic telepresence: profit analysis in reducing length of stay after laparoscopic gastric bypass. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[43]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  David Lee,et al.  Perception of Robot Smiles and Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[45]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey , 2005 .

[46]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  The Influence of a Robot's Social Abilities on Acceptance by Elderly Users , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[47]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  Hands-Off Therapist Robot Behavior Adaptation to User Personality for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[48]  Zhiwei Luo,et al.  Development of the Tactile Sensor System of a Human-Interactive Robot “RI-MAN” , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[49]  A. Tinker,et al.  Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: Feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[50]  Maja J Matarić,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Socially Assistive Robotics for Post-stroke Rehabilitation , 2007 .

[51]  T. Tamura,et al.  Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[52]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[53]  Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al.  Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[54]  Daniel Ichbiah,et al.  Robots: From Science Fiction to Technological Revolution , 2005 .

[55]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Eliciting Requirements for a Robotic Toy for Children with Autism - Results from User Panels , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[56]  J. Evans,et al.  Practical functional assessment of elderly persons: a primary-care approach. , 1995, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[57]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes , 2006, HRI '06.

[58]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose job is it anyway? a study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task , 2004 .

[59]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  Handbook of cognition and emotion , 1999 .

[60]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Robotics for surgery. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[61]  Joelle Pineau,et al.  Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly , 2002 .

[62]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Towards caring machines , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[63]  Rita Kobb,et al.  Assessing Technology Needs for the Elderly: Finding the Perfect Match for Home , 2003, Home healthcare nurse.

[64]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Care-O-bot II—Development of a Next Generation Robotic Home Assistant , 2004, Auton. Robots.

[65]  Tao Mei,et al.  Robotic pet based interactive home healthcare system , 2005, Proceedings, 2005 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics..

[66]  J. Novek,et al.  Nurses' perceptions of the reliability of an automated medication dispensing system. , 2000, Journal of nursing care quality.

[67]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Regulation and Entrainment in Human—Robot Interaction , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[68]  Helen Pain,et al.  Readiness of elders to use assistive devices to maintain their independence in the home. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[69]  C. Breazeal.  Sociable Machines: Expressive Social Ex-change Between Humans and Robots , 2000 .

[70]  M. Clark,et al.  Research Methods in Personality and Social Psychology , 1990 .

[71]  Paolo Dario,et al.  MOVAID: a personal robot in everyday life of disabled and elderly people , 1999 .

[72]  C. Ro,et al.  Mid-term results and patient perceptions of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2005, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[73]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology , 2007 .

[74]  J A Brebner,et al.  Experience-based guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine services , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[75]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Cross-Cultural Studies on Subjective Evaluation of a Seal Robot , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[76]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Effects of robot therapy for demented patients evaluated by EEG , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[77]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Living with Robots: Investigating the Habituation Effect in Participants' Preferences During a Longitudinal Human-Robot Interaction Study , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[78]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[79]  Ferdinando Fornara,et al.  Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[80]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Task Structure and User Attributes as Elements of Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[81]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  Evolutionary role model and basic emotions of service robots originated from computers , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..