Integrating the Kano Model and QFD for Designing New Products

Abstract Through a case study showing the development of a new mug of draft beer, this work presents a method for integration of the Kano model in Quality Function Deployment – QFD. Traditionally, QFD uses data about importance and customer's satisfaction with different requirements to identify the attributes that should be incorporated or improved in a product. As customers tend to rate basic requirements with high importance, the traditional QFD method tends to give higher priority to these requirements to the detriment of innovative ones. The Kano model allows the identification of exciting requirements, usually associated with innovations. Then, the integration of the Kano model in the QFD can allow innovative requirements to receive the necessary attention in the product's development process. Two methods, proposed in the literature for this integration, are presented and their limitations analyzed. Finally, through data collected with 289 potential consumers of draft beer mugs, the case study illustrates the proposed method.

[1]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[2]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[3]  Christine M. Haslegrave,et al.  Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics And The Design Of Work , 1986 .

[4]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[5]  F. F. Reichheld,et al.  Zero defections: quality comes to services. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[6]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[7]  C Berger,et al.  KANO’S METHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER-DEFINED QUALITY , 1993 .

[8]  Graham K. Morbey,et al.  Total quality development: A step-by-step guide to world-class concurrent engineering , 1995 .

[9]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[10]  Timo Pirttilä,et al.  Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano's quality element classification , 1998 .

[11]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment , 1998 .

[12]  Hamid Noori,et al.  Developing breakthrough products: challenges and options for market assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Stephen W. Brown,et al.  SERVICE QUALITY, Multidisciplinary and Multinational Perspectives , 2000 .

[14]  E. Anderson,et al.  Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain , 2000 .

[15]  K. Tan,et al.  Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment , 2000 .

[16]  K. Tan,et al.  Integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for service excellence development , 2001 .

[17]  Shueh-Chin Ting,et al.  The asymmetrical and non-linear effects of store quality attributes on customer satisfaction , 2002 .

[18]  Michael S. Garver Best practices in identifying customer-driven improvement opportunities , 2003 .

[19]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis , 2004 .

[20]  Barry Berman,et al.  How to Delight Your Customers , 2005 .