Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework

Abstract This paper presents a framework for characterising project complexity in large engineering projects, which can be used to adapt the front–end development phase of engineering projects to the particular complexity. Recently, a large number of project complexity related papers were published, demonstrating the evident importance of “complexity” in current project management research. However, no generally accepted framework is available to support the characterising and understanding of project complexity that appreciates the richness of project complexity in large engineering projects. Therefore the TOE (Technical, Organizational, and Environmental) framework was developed, based on a literature survey building upon existing work and on new empirical work consisting of eighteen interviews about six projects in the process engineering industry. As a result of an inductive approach, this framework presents the elements that contribute to project complexity from a theoretical as well as a practical perspective. The framework can be used to assess the complexity of engineering projects, and subsequently adapt the front–end development phase of projects in order to better manage the complexity of the project.

[1]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  Reconciling order and chaos in multi-project firms , 2008 .

[2]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[3]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[4]  Terry Williams,et al.  Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects , 2006 .

[5]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[6]  Joana G. Geraldi,et al.  What complexity assessments can tell us about projects: dialogue between conception and perception , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Managerial Complexity in Project-Based Operations: A Grounded Model and Its Implications for Practice , 2008 .

[8]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[9]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  On Faith, Fact, and Interaction in Projects , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Tools for Complex Projects , 2008 .

[12]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Understanding project complexity: implications on project management , 2008, Kybernetes.

[13]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Why Western vendors don't dominate China's ERP market , 2004, CACM.

[14]  Terry Williams,et al.  Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  E. Miller.  Technology, Territory, and Time , 1959 .

[16]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[17]  A. Jaafari.  Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change , 2003 .

[18]  T. Cooke‐Davies,et al.  We're not in Kansas Anymore, Toto: Mapping the Strange Landscape of Complexity Theory, and Its Relationship to Project Management , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[19]  Rajesh R. Parwani.  Complexity: An Introduction , 2002 .

[20]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management , 1988 .

[21]  Kim Wikström,et al.  Defining uncertainty in projects – a new perspective , 2008 .

[22]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[23]  Roger B. Mason.  The external environment's effect on management and strategy , 2007 .

[24]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[25]  Mohan V. Tatikonda.  An Empirical Study of Platform and Derivative Product Development Projects , 1999 .

[26]  H. De Bruijn,et al.  Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes , 2005 .

[27]  Robert L. Flood.  Liberating Systems Theory , 1990 .

[28]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[29]  R Dewar,et al.  Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[30]  Terry Williams,et al.  Modelling Complex Projects , 2001 .

[31]  R. Müller,et al.  Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type , 2007 .

[32]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  From theory to practice: toward a typology of project-management styles , 1998 .

[33]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[34]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Grasping the complexity of IS development projects , 2004, CACM.

[35]  W. Weaver.  Science and complexity. , 1948, American scientist.

[36]  J. R. Turner.  Evolution of project management research as evidenced by papers published in the International Journal of Project Management , 2010 .

[37]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[38]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  And then came complex project management (revised) , 2009 .

[39]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Complexity of Information Systems Development Projects: Conceptualization and Measurement Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[41]  P. Hall,et al.  Great Planning Disasters , 2019 .

[42]  Lynn Crawford,et al.  Senior management perceptions of project management competence , 2005 .

[43]  Ali Jaafari,et al.  Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift , 2001 .

[44]  K. Aaltonen,et al.  Stakeholder salience in global projects , 2008 .

[45]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  How Projects Differ, And What to Do About It , 2007 .