The 100th anniversary of the four-point probe technique: the role of probe geometries in isotropic and anisotropic systems

The electrical conductivity of solid-state matter is a fundamental physical property and can be precisely derived from the resistance measured via the four-point probe technique excluding contributions from parasitic contact resistances. Over time, this method has become an interdisciplinary characterization tool in materials science, semiconductor industries, geology, physics, etc, and is employed for both fundamental and application-driven research. However, the correct derivation of the conductivity is a demanding task which faces several difficulties, e.g. the homogeneity of the sample or the isotropy of the phases. In addition, these sample-specific characteristics are intimately related to technical constraints such as the probe geometry and size of the sample. In particular, the latter is of importance for nanostructures which can now be probed technically on very small length scales. On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the four-point probe technique, introduced by Frank Wenner, in this review we revisit and discuss various correction factors which are mandatory for an accurate derivation of the resistivity from the measured resistance. Among others, sample thickness, dimensionality, anisotropy, and the relative size and geometry of the sample with respect to the contact assembly are considered. We are also able to derive the correction factors for 2D anisotropic systems on circular finite areas with variable probe spacings. All these aspects are illustrated by state-of-the-art experiments carried out using a four-tip STM/SEM system. We are aware that this review article can only cover some of the most important topics. Regarding further aspects, e.g. technical realizations, the influence of inhomogeneities or different transport regimes, etc, we refer to other review articles in this field.

[1]  Ivica Kolaric,et al.  Carbon nanotube sheets for the use as artificial muscles , 2004 .

[2]  W. Prost,et al.  Resistance and dopant profiling along freestanding GaAs nanowires , 2013 .

[3]  J. Zieba,et al.  Electrical properties of flat textile material as inhomegeneous and anisotropic structure , 2013, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics.

[4]  W. Kern.  The Evolution of Silicon Wafer Cleaning Technology , 1990 .

[5]  Tao Xu,et al.  Electrical characterization of semiconductor nanowires by scanning tunneling microscopy , 2014, Photonics West - Optoelectronic Materials and Devices.

[6]  VERIFICATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN TWO-PROBE AND FOUR-PROBE RESISTANCES AS MEASURED ON SILICON WAFERS , 1990 .

[7]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[8]  Michael J. Corinthios.  Signals, Systems, Transforms, and Digital Signal Processing with MATLAB , 2009 .

[9]  M. Henzler,et al.  Chemical Status and Surface Topography Of Si(111) after HF/NH 4 F/H 2 O Wet Chemical Treatments: Investigations with STM, AES, and TDS , 1993 .

[10]  D. Ba,et al.  Characterization of Semiconductor Surface Conductivity by Using Microscopic Four-Point Probe Technique , 2012 .

[11]  Influence of finite size probes on the measurement of electrical resistivity using the four-probe technique , 2014 .

[12]  P. Bøggild,et al.  Revealing origin of quasi-one dimensional current transport in defect rich two dimensional materials , 2014 .

[13]  W. Versnel,et al.  Analysis of symmetrical Hall plates with finite contacts , 1981 .

[14]  F. Keywell,et al.  Measurement of the Sheet Resistivity of a Square Wafer with a Square Four‐Point Probe , 1960 .

[15]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[16]  O. Paul,et al.  How to Extract the Sheet Resistance and Hall Mobility From Arbitrarily Shaped Planar Four-Terminal Devices With Extended Contacts , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[17]  The evaluation of geometrical effects in four point probe measurements , 1971 .

[18]  Changhong Liu,et al.  Highly oriented carbon nanotube papers made of aligned carbon nanotubes , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[19]  Robert A. Weller,et al.  An algorithm for computing linear four-point probe thickness correction factors , 2001 .

[20]  M. Henzler,et al.  Anisotropic etching versus interaction of atomic steps: Scanning tunneling microscopy observations on HF/NH4F‐treated Si(111) , 1993 .

[21]  Quasi-one-dimensional metals on semiconductor surfaces with defects. , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[22]  Quantum Transport in Semiconductor Nanostructures , 2004, cond-mat/0412664.

[23]  Philipp Jaschinsky,et al.  Nanoscale charge transport measurements using a double-tip scanning tunneling microscope , 2008 .

[24]  T. Mimizuka.  The accuracy of the relaxation solution for the potential problem of a hall plate with finite hall electrodes , 1978 .

[25]  Anna Maria Mancini,et al.  Size and shape control of GaAs nanowires grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy using tertiarybutylarsine , 2006 .

[26]  B. A. Fuchs,et al.  Functions of a Complex Variable and Some of their Applications. , 1966 .

[27]  J. Albers,et al.  An Alternative Approach to the Calculation of Four‐Probe Resistances on Nonuniform Structures , 1985 .

[28]  D E Vaughan,et al.  Four-probe resistivity measurements on small circular specimens , 1961 .

[29]  John M. Reynolds,et al.  An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics , 1997 .

[30]  B. Logan,et al.  Series for Computing Current Flow in a Rectangular Block , 1971 .

[31]  F. Smits.  Measurement of sheet resistivities with the four-point probe , 1958 .

[32]  W. Versnel.  The geometrical correction factor for a rectangular Hall plate , 1982 .

[33]  Sune Thorsteinsson,et al.  Accurate microfour-point probe sheet resistance measurements on small samples. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[34]  L. J. Swartzendruber,et al.  Four-point probe measurement of non-uniformities in semiconductor sheet resistivity☆ , 1964 .

[35]  P. Bøggild,et al.  ELECTRICAL CONDUCTION THROUGH SURFACE SUPERSTRUCTURES MEASURED BY MICROSCOPIC FOUR-POINT PROBES , 2003 .

[36]  Carla Hertleer,et al.  Van Der Pauw method for measuring resistivities of anisotropic layers printed on textile substrates , 2011 .

[37]  W. L. Lim,et al.  Correction factors for films resistivity measurement , 2012 .

[38]  David S. Perloff.  Four-point sheet resistance correction factors for thin rectangular samples , 1977 .

[39]  O. Paul,et al.  The magnetic calibration of arbitrarily shaped Hall sensors in the absence of magnetic fields , 2009, TRANSDUCERS 2009 - 2009 International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference.

[40]  Determination of the in-plane components of the electrical conductivity tensor in PEM fuel cell gas diffusion layers , 2012 .

[41]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .

[42]  W L V Price,et al.  Extension of van der Pauw's theorem for measuring specific resistivity in discs of arbitrary shape to anisotropic media , 1972 .

[43]  Tadaaki Nagao,et al.  Independently driven four-tip probes for conductivity measurements in ultrahigh vacuum , 2001 .

[44]  Y. Kim,et al.  Geometric effects on resistivity measurements with four-electrode probes in isotropic and anisotropic tissues , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Noël Djongyang,et al.  A review of geophysical methods for geothermal exploration , 2015 .

[46]  W. Versnel.  Analysis of a circular Hall plate with equal finite contacts , 1981 .

[47]  W. Versnel,et al.  Electrical characteristics of an anisotropic semiconductor sample of circular shape with finite contacts , 1983 .

[48]  J. Wasscher.  Electrical transport phenomena in MnTe, an antiferromagnetic semiconductor , 1969 .

[49]  Rodney S. Ruoff,et al.  Correction factors for 4-probe electrical measurements with finite size electrodes and material anisotropy: a finite element study , 2007 .

[50]  Iwao Matsuda,et al.  Anisotropy in conductance of a quasi-one-dimensional metallic surface state measured by a square micro-four-point probe method. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[51]  Shang Da-Shang,et al.  Resistance switching in oxides with inhomogeneous conductivity , 2013, 1304.3290.

[52]  Masahiro Agu,et al.  Geometrical Correction Factor for Semiconductor Resistivity Measurements by Four-Point Probe Method , 1984 .

[53]  J. M. Luttinger.  An Exactly Soluble Model of a Many‐Fermion System , 1963 .

[54]  H. C. Montgomery.  Method for Measuring Electrical Resistivity of Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[55]  Yicai Sun,et al.  New method of calculating the correction factors for the measurement of sheet resistivity of a square sample with a square four-point probe , 1997 .

[56]  Dirch Hjorth Petersen,et al.  Sensitivity of resistive and Hall measurements to local inhomogeneities , 2013 .

[57]  Development and performance of the nanoworkbench: A four tip STM for conductivity measurements down to submicrometer scales , 2004, cond-mat/0411127.

[58]  C. Y. Shigue,et al.  Procedure for measuring electrical resistivity of anisotropic materials: A revision of the Montgomery method , 2011 .

[59]  D. Schroder.  Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization , 1990 .

[60]  L. B. Valdes,et al.  Resistivity Measurements on Germanium for Transistors , 1954, Proceedings of the IRE.

[61]  J. L. Stevens,et al.  4×1 reconstruction of indium deposited on vicinal Si(111) surfaces , 1993 .

[62]  G. Grüner,et al.  The dynamics of charge-density waves , 1988 .

[63]  Loyal Vivian Bewley.  Two-dimensional fields in electrical engineering , 1948 .

[64]  J. F. Combs,et al.  Correction factors for radial resistivity gradient evaluation of semiconductor slices , 1964 .

[65]  P. Bøggild,et al.  Sensitivity analysis explains quasi-one-dimensional current transport in two-dimensional materials , 2014 .

[66]  C. R. Crowell,et al.  Contact size effects on the van der Pauw method for resistivity and Hall coefficient measurement , 1974 .

[67]  W.L.V. Price.  Electric potential and current distribution in a rectangular sample of anisotropic material with application to the measurement of the principal resistivities by an extension of van der Pauw's method , 1973 .

[68]  C. Tegenkamp,et al.  Anisotropic conductance of Pb–induced chain structures on Si(557) in the monolayer regime , 2005 .

[69]  W. Versnel.  Analysis of symmetrical Van der Pauw structures with finite contacts , 1978 .

[70]  E. Rosseel,et al.  Review of electrical characterization of ultra-shallow junctions with micro four-point probes , 2010 .

[71]  Martin G. Buehler,et al.  Measurement of the resistivity of a thin square sample with a square four-probe array , 1977 .

[72]  M. W. Gunn,et al.  Four point probe Hall effect and resistivity measurements upon semiconductors , 1972 .

[73]  P. Hofmann,et al.  Surface-sensitive conductance measurements , 2009, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[74]  David S. Perloff,et al.  Four‐Point Sheet Resistance Measurements of Semiconductor Doping Uniformity , 1977 .