Limited internal friction in the rate-limiting step of a two-state protein folding reaction.

Small, single-domain proteins typically fold via a compact transition-state ensemble in a process well fitted by a simple, two-state model. To characterize the rate-limiting conformational changes that underlie two-state folding, we have investigated experimentally the effects of changing solvent viscosity on the refolding of the IgG binding domain of protein L. In conjunction with numerical simulations, our results indicate that the rate-limiting conformational changes of the folding of this domain are strongly coupled to solvent viscosity and lack any significant "internal friction" arising from intrachain collisions. When compared with the previously determined solvent viscosity dependencies of other, more restricted conformational changes, our results suggest that the rate-limiting folding transition involves conformational fluctuations that displace considerable amounts of solvent. Reconciling evidence that the folding transition state ensemble is comprised of highly collapsed species with these and similar, previously reported results should provide a significant constraint for theoretical models of the folding process.

[1]  D. Baker,et al.  Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  C. Tanford,et al.  Isopiestic compositions as a measure of preferential interactions of macromolecules in two-component solvents. Application to proteins in concentrated aqueous cesium chloride and guanidine hydrochloride. , 1967, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  T. Schindler,et al.  Diffusion control in an elementary protein folding reaction. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Acquisition of native beta-strand topology during the rapid collapse phase of protein folding. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[5]  J. Onuchic,et al.  DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS OF THE REACTION COORDINATE FOR PROTEIN FOLDING FUNNELS , 1996, cond-mat/9601091.

[6]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  On-pathway versus off-pathway folding intermediates. , 1996, Folding & design.

[7]  M Karplus,et al.  The Levinthal paradox: yesterday and today. , 1997, Folding & design.

[8]  T. Sosnick,et al.  The barriers in protein folding , 1994, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  L. Björck,et al.  Proton nuclear magnetic resonance sequential assignments and secondary structure of an immunoglobulin light chain-binding domain of protein L. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[10]  Michelle L. Scalley,et al.  Characterization of the free energy spectrum of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Folding & design.

[11]  A. Riggs,et al.  SULFHYDRYL GROUPS AND THE STRUCTURE OF HEMOGLOBIN , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[12]  I D Campbell,et al.  A comparison of the folding kinetics and thermodynamics of two homologous fibronectin type III modules. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Brownian motion of the ends of oligopeptide chains in solution as estimated by energy transfer between the chain ends , 1978 .

[14]  W. Doster,et al.  Solvent composition and viscosity effects on the kinetics of CO binding to horse myoglobin. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[15]  C. Pace,et al.  Denaturant m values and heat capacity changes: Relation to changes in accessible surface areas of protein unfolding , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  C. Tanford,et al.  Viscosity and density of aqueous solutions of urea and guanidine hydrochloride. , 1966, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  M Karplus,et al.  Protein folding dynamics: The diffusion‐collision model and experimental data , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  D Baker,et al.  Kinetics of folding of the IgG binding domain of peptostreptococcal protein L. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[19]  H. Kramers.  Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[20]  I D Campbell,et al.  Folding kinetics of the SH3 domain of PI3 kinase by real-time NMR combined with optical spectroscopy. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[22]  M. Marahiel,et al.  Extremely rapid protein folding in the absence of intermediates , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[23]  M. Hurle,et al.  Characterization of a slow folding reaction for the α subunit of tryptophan synthase , 1987 .

[24]  Protein folding: Does diffusion determine the folding rate? , 1997, Current Biology.

[25]  D Baker,et al.  Protein folding kinetics exhibit an Arrhenius temperature dependence when corrected for the temperature dependence of protein stability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2. 1. Evidence for a two-state transition. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[27]  H. Roder,et al.  Kinetic role of early intermediates in protein folding. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  C. M. Jones,et al.  The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. , 1992, Science.

[29]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Viscosity Dependence of the Folding Rates of Proteins , 1997, cond-mat/9705309.

[30]  P. Wolynes,et al.  Rate theories and puzzles of hemeprotein kinetics. , 1985, Science.