Abstract The Westinghouse AP1000® reactor is an advanced design whose safety systems are mainly passive safety systems. Due to the passive nature of the safety related systems and its dependency on small changes on certain variables (e.g. pressure, friction coefficients) together with the use of a simplified code like MAAP in Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) analyses, it makes necessary to confirm that when core cooling is achieved, thermal-hydraulic (T/H) uncertainties are bounded. The T/H uncertainty evaluation process performed by Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC) identified the low-margin sequences (core uncovery) by expanding PRA Event Trees (ETs). The expanded ETs allowed finding the low-margin risk-important sequences and then a set of low-margin bounding sequences was selected. Then detailed safety analysis methodologies were applied in order to evaluate the bounding sequences demonstrating that the T/H uncertainties were bounded. The Universidad Politecnica de Madrid group has verified the low-margin bounding sequences obtained by WEC with the best-estimate TRACE code in order to verify the previous results and also to study the phenomenology of such sequences through a best-estimate code. This paper presents the results obtained for short-term low-margin bounding sequences. In general, TRACE results do not present important discrepancies with respect to NOTRUMP and WCOBRA/TRAC results although TRACE presents lower values for Peak Cladding Temperature. This analysis has allowed to verify the AP1000 thermal-hydraulic bounding evaluation process performed by WEC for the low-margin risk-important sequences with TRACE code.
[1]
C. Queral,et al.
AP1000® SBLOCA simulations with TRACE code
,
2015
.
[2]
César Queral,et al.
AP1000® Large-Break LOCA BEPU analysis with TRACE code
,
2015
.
[3]
Jinzhao Zhang,et al.
Application of the W̱COBRA/TRAC best-estimate methodology to the AP600 large-break LOCA analysis
,
1998
.
[4]
César Queral,et al.
Risk reduction due to modification of normal residual heat removal system of AP1000® reactor to meet European Utility Requirements
,
2016
.
[5]
B. E. Boyack,et al.
Updated TRAC analysis of an 80% double-ended cold-leg break for the AP600 design
,
1995
.
[6]
Lawrence E. Hochreiter,et al.
Simulated AP600 Response to Small-Break Loss-of-Coolant-Accident and Non-Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Events: Analysis of SPES-2 Integral Test Results
,
1998
.
[7]
R. F. Wright.
SIMULATED AP1000 RESPONSE TO DESIGN BASIS SMALL-BREAK LOCA EVENTS IN APEX-1000 TEST FACILITY
,
2007
.